Before withdrawing from Paris climate agreement Trump called Fox News host for advice

Cypress said:
I am trying to decide if history will remember him as "President Pussy Grabber", or "President Princess Curtsey".
Click to expand...

As Obama said, "At least history will remember him as a PRESIDENT" :), something that Hillary and her 90% victory declaration will never witness....unless you count being the president of California as a historical truth.....or being the spouse of President "blow job" as something historically special. The difference? Trump has only been accused with no evidence.....both Clintons were caught with their (wink, wink) pants down around their ankles...one a sexual predator the other an enabler and defender of sexual deviancy. Of course the stains on the young interns clothes was just CIRCUMSTANTIAL unlike the accusations against P R E S I D E N T Trump, which were Documented? Really?
 
Last edited:
Guille said:
How did they do that?
Click to expand...

So, once again intent on proving that you were against something you didn't even understand?

The world knew that the anti-science and global warming denying United State republican controlled senate would never pass a legally binding treaty with enforceable reduction goals.

The only recourse was to accommodate President Obama, and allow him to enter into a non-binding agreement with non-enforceable reduction goals, and giving vast flexibility to individual nations to determine how to meet those voluntary goals.

Lesson over.

I am shocked you were against something you did not even understand. I hope that is not your standard MO in real life.
 
Cypress said:
So, once again intent on proving that you were against something you didn't even understand?

The world knew that the anti-science and global warming denying United State republican controlled senate would never pass a legally binding treaty with enforceable reduction goals.

The only recourse was to accommodate President Obama, and allow him to enter into a non-binding agreement with non-enforceable reduction goals, and giving vast flexibility to individual nations to determine how to meet those voluntary goals.

Lesson over.

I am shocked you were against something you did not even understand. I hope that is not your standard MO in real life.
Click to expand...

I apparently understand it better than you do. There is actually a good answer you could give here but that bullshit about the environment and global warming isn't it.
 
What's the big deal about leaving another US Wealth Redistribution Scam blowing in the wind? What did you lefties expect....another Rhino like Bush? History will remember Trump for one thing......shaking the hell out of LIBERALISM and making them hold their breath until they turned "RED" by putting the United States best interest in front of World Politics. The only ones that will lose on this deal are the ones that have invested in the scam while expecting special treatment in return from DC.
 
Ralph said:
What's the big deal about leaving another US Wealth Redistribution Scam blowing in the wind? What did you lefties expect....another Rhino like Bush? History will remember Trump for one thing......shaking the hell out of LIBERALISM and making them hold their breath until they turned "RED" by putting the United States best interest in front of World Politics. The only ones that will lose on this deal are the ones that have invested in the scam while expecting special treatment in return from DC.
Click to expand...

"Sticking it to liberals" is not a coherent political philosophy. It is the rhetorical equivalent of the irate old man yelling at the kids to get off his lawn.

A suggestion to consider: I don't know if you will still be around in a couple decades, but if you are you should consider saying that you were never a climate denier. At that point in time, people might be looking to (literally) crucify climate deniers for their role in spawning an environmental catastrophe.
 
Cypress said:
"Sticking it to liberals" is not a coherent political philosophy. It is the rhetorical equivalent of the irate old man yelling at the kids to get off his lawn.

A suggestion to consider: I don't know if you will still be around in a couple decades, but if you are you should consider saying that you were never a climate denier. At that point in time, people might be looking to (literally) crucify climate deniers for their role in spawning an environmental catastrophe.
Click to expand...

Climaphobes. Common internet ailment.
 
Cypress said:
This is what I tried to tell rightwing nimcompoops when they whined about why Obama did not get Senate confirmation. A non-binding, non-enforceable agreement does not require Senate approval. The world bent over backwards to accommodate the United States in this non-biding agreement. Dumpf pulled out of in because of mere childish spite.

Which begs the question: why were reich wingers so against it, when they didn't even fucking understand what it was they were against?

Also worth noting: Observe how Fox News, and much of the greater wingnutosphere is not even bothering trying to deny any longer that pumping vast quantities of green house gasses into the atmosphere is a really, really bad idea. I would call this the 39th billion time deniers have moved the goal posts and backtracked.

That was also the freaking quickest flip flop in history: from Drumpf's position mere months ago that global warming is a Chinese Hoax.
Click to expand...

Let me lay it out for you. If Trump signs on, some court will rule that America must pay when the inevitable lawsuits get filed by the so called victimized countries in the UN IPCC Paris agreement scam.
You guys are fucking blind. Really. You especially.
 
tinfoil said:
Let me lay it out for you. If Trump signs on, some court will rule that America must pay when the inevitable lawsuits get filed by the so called victimized countries in the UN IPCC Paris agreement scam.
You guys are fucking blind. Really. You especially.
Click to expand...


Not even going to read what you wrote.

You have zero credibility. None. Nada. Zilch.

At the height of the phony Climategate non-scandal, you were crowing about how climate change was a hoax, perpetrated by an international cabal of lying scientists, who faked data in the hope of perpetrating a hoax on the world.

You are stuck with that, and you are never, under any circumstances allowed to backtrack, goal post move, and revise your previous ridiculous convictions of a global conspiracy.

That is why I will never read anything you write on climate. It lacks any semblance of credibility and honesty.
 
Guille said:
Before withdrawing from Paris climate agreement Trump called Fox News host for advice

If this is true this is pretty weak.
Click to expand...

Advise ???? Its total bullshit.....more fake news from those affected by Trump derangement.....
 
Bill said:
Who have believed a sitting precedent would be calling unqualified tv ppl for advice on the climate of the world.:palm:

& to think we use to joke about it before he was elected.
Click to expand...
Well, I kinda have to agree with you on this one, he did talk to al gore about this too. And they weren't discussing "the climate of the world", they were discussing a stupid anti-American scheme to bilk us out of billions of dollars.
 
Cypress said:
"Sticking it to liberals" is not a coherent political philosophy. It is the rhetorical equivalent of the irate old man yelling at the kids to get off his lawn.

A suggestion to consider: I don't know if you will still be around in a couple decades, but if you are you should consider saying that you were never a climate denier. At that point in time, people might be looking to (literally) crucify climate deniers for their role in spawning an environmental catastrophe.
Click to expand...

To equate the fall of liberalism to an analogy about someone yelling with no authority behind the voice is the quint essential "denier" of reality as compared to a political redistribution of wealth theory (man made global warming) void of the empirical evidence required to be a "fact" of objective science.

Reality: Trump is president. A president that won an election that was predicted by smart asses such as you to be a 90% lock for fascist socialism as dictated by the state run media (the propaganda arm of socialism). This is a documented and observable fact. The best the real deniers can do is attempt to pretend that the failed ideology of social communism was not to blame for the sudden and real downsize of socialism at all levels of government....with the documented Loss of 910 seats of power since 2010, the control of both houses of congress, the executive branch and thanks to liberal political games...perhaps the loss of their favorite tool of denial for the next generation...SCOTUS (the dog and phony show where the socialists bypass congress in order to make law via a politically based dictatorial :)Oligarchy).

What was the "real" reason that socialism has failed over the past 7 years if its not their failed policies? Of course...THE RUSSIANS are to blame. LMAO

The reality of your current predicament? That single voice crying in the wilderness? "A voice of one calling in the wilderness, make way for the Lord; make straight in the dessert a highway for our God." No one can stand against God.
 
Last edited:
Ralph said:
To equate the fall of liberalism to an analogy about someone yelling with no authority behind the voice is the quint essential "denier" of reality as compared to a political theory void of the empirical evidence required to be a "fact" of objective science.

Reality: Trump is president. A president that won an election that was predicted by smart asses such as you to be a 90% lock for fascist socialism as dictated by the state run media (the propaganda arm of socialism). This is a documented and observable fact. The best the real deniers can do is attempt to pretend that the failed ideology of social communism was not to blame for the sudden and real downsize of socialism at all levels of government....with the documented Loss of 910 seats of power since 2010, the control of both houses of congress, the executive branch and thanks to liberal political games...perhaps the loss of their favorite tool of denial for the next generation...SCOTUS (the dog and phony show where the socialists bypass congress in order to make law via politically based dictatorial :)Oligarchy).
Click to expand...

Reality; Trump will not finish his first year in office
 
Ralph said:
Send in the clowns.........:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

They are here already;

scary-clowns-trump-team.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top