Should electoral votes be apportioned according to how much a state pays in taxes?

[FUCK THE POLICE]

?

 

[Amadeus]

What?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Yay, poll taxes.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

the system we have has worked great since the 1700s........let's keep it........

 

[USFREEDOM911]

?

Should we then determine voting rights, by how much a person pays in State Taxes?

 

[NOVA]

Should we then determine voting rights, by how much a person pays in State Taxes?

Idiots can't think that far ahead....USF.....and the US Constitution is just a mystery to 'em.......

 

[Lightbringer]

?

No.

 

[iolo]

No - the trick is to allow votes only to those who can demonstrate their legitimate descent from Adam and Eve, including proof of the property holdings of each generation. Trumpf Raus!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

No - the trick is to allow votes only to those who can demonstrate their legitimate descent from Adam and Eve, including proof of the property holdings of each generation. Trumpf Raus!

ah child.....that would allow even you to vote in the US elections.....clearly not acceptable......

 

[tsuke]

i really dont think you want this. All you would have to do is move some military bases or production facilities around and you would vastly impact the GDP of each state.

 

[Micawber]

no

 

[Irish]

If you coincide that with only letting taxpayers vote, then sure.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No - the trick is to allow votes only to those who can demonstrate their legitimate descent from Adam and Eve, including proof of the property holdings of each generation. Trumpf Raus!

Won't that pretty much result in Wales being nonessential?

 

[Getin the ring]

?

Should electoral votes be apportioned according to how much a state pays in taxes?

So not only do you ask a silly question you create an entire thread to highlight it.
lolololo

 

[tsuke]

Won't that pretty much result in Wales being nonessential?

wales was always non-essential : )

 

[Lightbringer]

wales was always non-essential : )

Not true. Back in the day...way way way back in the day...that's where England got their pirates from. Errrrrr, not pirates, they were "privateers".

 

[USFREEDOM911]

wales was always non-essential : )

I know and I was just throwing out a "softball".

 

[tsuke]

I know and I was just throwing out a "softball".

if were being honest though they played a big part in the war of the roses. Though in all honesty England may have been better of under York.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

if were being honest though they played a big part in the war of the roses. Though in all honesty England may have been better of under York.

Wales has always been a good place to look for conscriptions.

 

[iolo]

wales was always non-essential : )

Jesus, aren't these racist arseholes tedious!