Were you fine with Ted Nugent but upset at Kathy Griffin?

Yaya said:
And Ted didn't even try to kill anyone or even make a threat too, yet what he says bothers you more, it seems.

Also, you don't understand symbolism and so are not qualified to discuss this. Just stop, you have e no clue what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

Neither really bothers me.
 
Thing1 said:
Good thing that Kathy Griffin didn't behead anyone.
Click to expand...

I actually asked the question in real life terms and you of course dodged the question.

If I make a movie about beheading someone, but of course it is fake, th en it does not really mean anything, is that your point?

You are not smart enough to discuss this topic as you have no clue what symbolism is.
 
Darth Omar said:
Nugent and Griffin were both out of line.

That said, cutting heads off is symbolic of radical Islam. In fact, it's their ultimate political statement. No doubt ISIS and other radical Muslim groups were cheering Griffin on.

I don't know if she is just plain oblivious to the full extent of her political statement or if she subconsciously admires them.

In either event, it's pretty twisted.
Click to expand...

The left in general subconsciously admires radical Islam. Why do you think they never speak out against ISIS/AQ? They consider them allies in their war against the evil west.
 
Thing1 said:
There is the distinction, Yurtsie. Darthy said cutting heads off is "barbaric" as THE differentiator.

The only alternative is that what Ted said is civilized. If it was barbaric, why would Darth point that out?

I'm sure you'll come up w/ some reason why it's 'different,' but you guys have lost your way on this one. There is minimal difference between what Ted & Kathy did. And like I said - neither "outrages" me. I think you're faux-outrage about only Griffin is hilarious.
Click to expand...

Circular. You brought up Ted and then used him as an excuse for Kathy. Good Job punk ass bitch!
 
Yaya said:
Yet you keep bringing him up.
Click to expand...

That's what the OP is about. Did you miss that?

And Jarod was spot on. I wasn't outraged about either - but you are crazy over-the-top about Griffin, and barely care about Nugent.

You're just exposed, which is why you're ticked.
 
Thing1 said:
There is the distinction, Yurtsie. Darthy said cutting heads off is "barbaric" as THE differentiator.

The only alternative is that what Ted said is civilized. If it was barbaric, why would Darth point that out?

I'm sure you'll come up w/ some reason why it's 'different,' but you guys have lost your way on this one. There is minimal difference between what Ted & Kathy did. And like I said - neither "outrages" me. I think you're faux-outrage about only Griffin is hilarious.
Click to expand...

You're obsessed with Yurt. How sad.

Anyway, he brought it up because of my post to you about which is less barbaric. Also, you're lying about what he said. He never said it was civilized.

And you said some people, who are the others?
 
Thing1 said:
I brought up Ted?

You sure about that?

You guys seem to have forgotten what thread you're on.
Click to expand...

Yes, you did bring up Ted.

Here's why no one trusts you fuckers...you try to lie in a thread where anyone can scroll back and read your words and most readers probably already have read them. Punk ass bitch.
 
Thing1 said:
Don't talk to me about intelligence.

You are a seriously simplistic and stupid person.
Click to expand...

LOL. You don't even know what symbolism means. You should not tell anyone anything about their intelligence.

You've lied in this more than once and can't even discuss the topic rationally because you don't what symbolism is.
 
Yaya said:
LOL. You don't even know what symbolism means. You should not tell anyone anything about their intelligence.

You've lied in this more than once and can't even discuss the topic rationally because you don't what symbolism is.
Click to expand...

And you're lying about my knowledge of symbolism.

I'd like to hear you say it: say "I am completely outraged by what Kathy Griffin did."
 
Thing1 said:
That's hackery on steroids. But predictable.

What Nugent said is arguably worse - an actual threat. I called it, though. It's "different" w/ you, and basically harmless.

And yet you go all snowflake when it comes to Griffin. Go figure.
Click to expand...

Thingy is a Griffith apologist. She held a severed bloody head, and all Ted did was make crude remarks.

What a joke Thingy is. If it was an actual threat, he would have been arrested, but he wasn't. After reading his comments again, it seems he is using his guns as a phallic symbol. Again, thingy doesn't understand symbolism.
 
Yaya said:
You're obsessed with Yurt. How sad.

Anyway, he brought it up because of my post to you about which is less barbaric. Also, you're lying about what he said. He never said it was civilized.

And you said some people, who are the others?
Click to expand...

Who are the others Thingy?
 
Irish said:
Ted never threatened Obama directly. He made an asinine comment no doubt.

But once again this is apples to oranges argument. First, holding a severed head is about 20x worse than what Ted said. 2nd Ted isn't affiliated with a major news network, and doesn't perform regularly. He's kind of just a guy that appears on tv every now and again.

Don't get started on hypocrisy. The liberals own hypocrisy. They live it every day of their lives.
Click to expand...

The only flaw in your logic is Griffin wasn't holding a severed head.
 
Thing1 said:
Look at the posts of pretty much every rightie on this thread. And there you go.
Click to expand...

Nice try, cite.

We both know you were talking about me and then you went back to cite my post and realized I never said that, so you had to pull darths post out of your ass and claim, oh, oh, but he must have meant that. He didn't say it, but, but he meant it.

You're pathetic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top