FOX News retracts story about murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich

Cypress said:
When I got to this sentence, I began to assume you posted satire from "The Onion".

The network of serial sexual harassers Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly never struck me as having a "high degree of editorial scrutiny". Are they actually even a news network?

I always thought Fox was entertainment targeted at mediocre, barely educated, old, conservative white men, no?
Click to expand...

christiefan915 said:
I literally laughed out loud when I read "high degree of editorial scrutiny." IMO Faux is just a cut above sites like Infowars.
Click to expand...

NOVA said:
And Newsweek printed this....

sources involved with the DNC’s investigation of a foreign hack of its files last year rule out the notion that Seth Rich had any role in the affair. “There was no indication that any insider was involved in this,” says one source, demanding anonymity in exchange for discussing the sensitive and ongoing investigation. “Every indication is this was a remote attack from a foreign government—the Russians. There is no indication that…there was any nefarious action taken by any employees in that environment.”
http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-murder-dnc-hack-julian-assange-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-492084


More unfounded conspiracy theories ???? The Russians did it ? Thats akin to saying the DNC did it....

Wonder if they will retract this article....
Click to expand...

How sweet....I'm sure you both had no problem believing Newsweek with their theory (FROM A DNC SOURCE, of course) claiming that the Russian's did it, right.....\''

No retraction needed there....no laughing about their theory....no questioning what the fuck they mean that "there was every indication it was 'remote' attack by the Ruskies"....no questioning what those 'indications' are......you're both hypocrites, but they you all know that
 
Trump supporters believe what they're told to believe, and told what not to believe. If they're told to believe a lie, they'll believe it.
 
So one would have to believe that a DNC staffer would just get randomly gunned down in the middle of the night with all of his valubles still on his person.

could happen, but at least worth looking into in the current climate of fishing expeditions
 
Getin the ring said:
So one would have to believe that a DNC staffer would just get randomly gunned down in the middle of the night with all of his valubles still on his person.

could happen, but at least worth looking into in the current climate of fishing expeditions
Click to expand...

It's not like it doesn't happen.

But I'd like to know how they can so confidently rule out assassination [which is what it would be] if they don't at least have some suspects or witnesses.

Inquisitive minds want to know.
 
Darth Omar said:
Hopefully, Mueller is more curious than the left. But I understand he and Comey are good buddies so the fix might be in.

It all starts with the DNC server. The fact Comey acquiesced to the DNC is troubling. I can think of no good reason why the FBI would take a third party's word on such a critical piece of evidence---and when there is so much at stake.

It's crazy. And yeah, as imaginative as the left can be with their theorizing about Trump and Russians, they suffer a sudden lack of imagination when it comes to Seth Rich.

It's telling.
Click to expand...
the non-robbery robbery is the explanation. the DNC didn't want the FBI to investigate..WTF?

so here we are with crowdstrike as an investigative agency,
while DC police cant' explain how a robbery is when nothing is taken. awesome
 
The DNC, which just got caught cheating Bernie out of the nomination, then tells the world they were hacked in a major conspiracy involving Trump and the Russians. This after suffering the worst political upset in their history. But no one can see their evidence for such an outlandish claim. Appoint a Special Prosecutor to prosecute this non-crime.

Then the DNC, in the form of that brain dead buffalo (Hillary's words) Donna Brazile, puts the brakes on an investigation into a "botched robbery" of a DNC employee who may or may not have been the provider of said leaks, and there may not have been any hack at all.

Move along, folks. Nothing to see here.
 
Thing1 said:
The FBI started the Russia investigation.

GazzaQueen = investigate Rich, but not Russia.
Click to expand...

The investigation was started because the DNC claimed they were hacked. But no one can check it out to see for themselves. Take our word for it.

Then send in the brain dead buffalo to put the clamps down on an investigation involving one of the DNC's own employees.

Prog cucks = busted and lost elections follow in their wake.
 
GazzaQueen said:
The investigation was started because the DNC claimed they were hacked. But no one can check it out to see for themselves. Take our word for it.

Then send in the brain dead buffalo to put the clamps down on an investigation involving one of the DNC's own employees.

Prog cucks = busted and lost elections follow in their wake.
Click to expand...

Hey, I just think it's heartwarming to see you guys back in the investigation bandwagon.
 
Thing1 said:
Yeah. The idea of Russia helping to determine our elections is so innocuous by comparison.
Click to expand...

It's not a criminal offense. Like a botched robbery is.

Why do you think the DNC demands an investigation into one and denies an investigation into the other?
 
GazzaQueen said:
It's not a criminal offense. Like a botched robbery is.

Why do you think the DNC demands an investigation into one and denies an investigation into the other?
Click to expand...

A foreign power meddling in our election? I don't know; go figure. What alarmists.

I was just as curious why all of the posters who have whined every day about the Russia probe can't seem to get enough of the speculation about Rich.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top