Comey's revenge is a gun without powder

I'm glad to see a select few Republicans are capable of nuance. Let's play it out further. As we know, in any future proceeding, Comey is not the trier of fact, he is a witness. He also possesses a document which he will claim is a past recollection recorded of the content of a conversation. Given the comparative jeopardy, I'd rather be the extortion victim than the extortionist. The memo is closer to Clinton's semen on Monica's dress than evidence of a crime by Comey.

PS special counsel appointed on Russia. Choke on it.

The memo, contemporaneously written immediately following the meeting and sworn to as accurate, is as strong evidence as a tape recording, if there was one.
 
The memo, contemporaneously written immediately following the meeting and sworn to as accurate, is as strong evidence as a tape recording, if there was one.

Ah, Buck Buck. Where the hell is it?????? Seems no one has seen that. Getting a little tired of asking here.
 
The memo, contemporaneously written immediately following the meeting and sworn to as accurate, is as strong evidence as a tape recording, if there was one.

Opinions are not facts in a court of law.

However, if it was Comey's opinion that the POTUS asked him to commit a felony it should be in his notes, and he should have reported it immediately.
 
You are basing this all on "fact" already. So I politely ask you once again, where is it??

Knowing Comey's standard operating procedures there are several copies of it in several places including Comey's personal files and official FBI records...
He is that thorough.
If you wish to pretend, Trumptard style, that it does not exist, have fun with that notion until the hearing...
 
Let me get this straight...
Trump defenders are trying to say that the crime that no one disputes their hero committed can't be a crime because the guy who knew about it didn't report it the second it happened?

Yeah ...fucking ironclad defense...

LMFAO

I am saying that according to the Washington Post Flynn had nothing wrong with his communications with "the RUSSIANS"
 
Opinions are not facts in a court of law.

However, if it was Comey's opinion that the POTUS asked him to commit a felony it should be in his notes, and he should have reported it immediately.

The "opinion" will be in the hands of the adjudicators, the facts will be the quotes presented in the memo and Comey's testimony.
 
Knowing Comey's standard operating procedures there are several copies of it in several places including Comey's personal files and official FBI records...
He is that thorough.
If you wish to pretend, Trumptard style, that it does not exist, have fun with that notion until the hearing...

You are dancing around the only known FACT here. That there is no memo that anyone can produce as of yet. You have no idea about Comey's "operating procedures" other than what you are reading. Once again I would like to point out based on innuendo.
Innuendo are not facts to rational thinking people.
 
You are dancing around the only known FACT here. That there is no memo that anyone can produce as of yet. You have no idea about Comey's "operating procedures" other than what you are reading. Once again I would like to point out based on innuendo.
Innuendo are not facts to rational thinking people.

Okay, you go with that, Trumptard...
 
The memo, contemporaneously written immediately following the meeting and sworn to as accurate, is as strong evidence as a tape recording, if there was one.

are you truly this delusional?

a private diary does not hold the same weight as a recorded two person conversation.
 
You are dancing around the only known FACT here. That there is no memo that anyone can produce as of yet. You have no idea about Comey's "operating procedures" other than what you are reading. Once again I would like to point out based on innuendo.
Innuendo are not facts to rational thinking people.

Innuendo is not Italian for anal sex.
 
Back
Top