McMaster explains the fake news of the liberals

Media: Rump did "XYZ"

White House: Rump would never do "ABC"

Rumpers on JPP: See its fake News, the White House Denied it.

Rump: I did "XY and Z" so fuck you.

Rumpers on JPP: Rump is a hero, he did "XY and Z" and is proud of it.
 
Jarod said:
Media: Rump did "XYZ"

White House: Rump would never do "ABC"

Rumpers on JPP: See its fake News, the White House Denied it.

Rump: I did "XY and Z" so fuck you.

Rumpers on JPP: Rump is a hero, he did "XY and Z" and is proud of it.
Click to expand...


What information did Trump admit to divulging? Can you stop hyperventilating long enough to tell us? You are responding in real time to news that isn't fully vetted


tenor.gif
 
Thing1 said:
Based on the information he gave away, they said that it could possibly be deduced who the source of that information is. That is why information like that is kept confidential.

Ergo - you really do not know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...
it's
1where did this come from (location)
2who did it
3search that out

we still don't know the Intel,and it's someone against ISIS..why would Russia want to go after a source that goes after ISIS ( if they could even deduce that)

4. such is the nature of intelligence sharing -partners or not. nothing new here.
 
anatta said:
it's
1where did this come from (location)
2who did it
3search that out

we still don't know the Intel,and it's someone against ISIS..why would Russia want to go after a source that goes after ISIS ( if they could even deduce that)

4. such is the nature of intelligence sharing -partners or not. nothing new here.
Click to expand...

The bolded is sort of unreal. It's not about Russia "going after" the source.

You have to set this one aside for a bit. Go and read what this is really about; maybe watch some cable. You're so stuck on the "Russiaphobia" thing that you don't seem to know what this story is really about.
 
Thing1 said:
The bolded is sort of unreal. It's not about Russia "going after" the source.

You have to set this one aside for a bit. Go and read what this is really about; maybe watch some cable. You're so stuck on the "Russiaphobia" thing that you don't seem to know what this story is really about.
Click to expand...
why would Russia want to go after a source that goes after ISIS ( if they could even deduce that)
Click to expand...
make your case,and stop telling me WTF to do, you asshole
 
Apparently, McMaster just came out and said that Trump DID name the city, and also didn't deny that Trump shared classified info.

How's about that, Grind? Maybe a bit premature w/ this thread and the whole "fake news" narrative?

Don't expect to see you much on JPP today.
 
Thing1 said:
Apparently, McMaster just came out and said that Trump DID name the city, and also didn't deny that Trump shared classified info.

How's about that, Grind? Maybe a bit premature w/ this thread and the whole "fake news" narrative?

Don't expect to see you much on JPP today.
Click to expand...

The President can't share classified info.
 
Thing1 said:
Apparently, McMaster just came out and said that Trump DID name the city, and also didn't deny that Trump shared classified info.

How's about that, Grind? Maybe a bit premature w/ this thread and the whole "fake news" narrative?

Don't expect to see you much on JPP today.
Click to expand...

LIAR

McMaster did not say that. Is your outright hatred for Trump and being wrong about the election so great that you would lie about the facts?

as the facts roll out the hyperventilating liberals are shown to be spinning in a circle chasing their tails once again so they try to save face
 
I Love America said:
LIAR

McMaster did not say that. Is your outright hatred for Trump and being wrong about the election so great that you would lie about the facts?

as the facts roll out the hyperventilating liberals are shown to be spinning in a circle chasing their tails once again so they try to save face
Click to expand...

I said "apparently," because it's just now being reported. How did I lie?
 
Thing1 said:
Apparently, McMaster just came out and said that Trump DID name the city, and also didn't deny that Trump shared classified info.

How's about that, Grind? Maybe a bit premature w/ this thread and the whole "fake news" narrative?

Don't expect to see you much on JPP today.
Click to expand...


Any thoughts on the Washington Post using "former intelligence officials" as primary sources for this story? Any at all? Or is that too nuanced for you?
 
Thing1 said:
Were they the ONLY sources?
Click to expand...

Should they have EVEN been used as a source to begin with? For a second turn off your Trump hatred and embarrassment over the 2016 election and being so wrong.

1) Why would the Washington Post reach out to "former intelligence" officials?
2) Why would "former intelligence officials" reach out to the Washington Post?
3) How would "former intelligence officials" even know about the discussion?

Don't you think the leaks to the Washington Post are more dangerous than Trump?

Try this on for size. Switch the name Trump for Obama. See what you come up with.
 
I Love America said:
Should they have EVEN been used as a source to begin with? For a second turn off your Trump hatred and embarrassment over the 2016 election and being so wrong.

1) Why would the Washington Post reach out to "former intelligence" officials?
2) Why would "former intelligence officials" reach out to the Washington Post?
3) How would "former intelligence officials" even know about the discussion?

Don't you think the leaks to the Washington Post are more dangerous than Trump?

Try this on for size. Switch the name Trump for Obama. See what you come up with.
Click to expand...

It's a story about intelligence.

Yeah - I can see why they'd reach out to people w/ experience in the intelligence community. Journalism 101. If those were their ONLY sources, that could be problematic, but they weren't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top