7 facts that make the Washington Post story dubious - Desthard free zone

[canceled.2021.1]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/16/leaks-fake-news-trump-washington-post/

The most interesting is that The Washington Post used "former intelligence officials" as primary sources. Now how would a former intelligence official know if they weren't in the meeting?

Does any liberal find that odd? Or are you so confounded with Trump hatred that details aren't relevant to you?

 

[Celticguy]

#1 fact, it's the WaPo

 

[domer76]

lol

Breitbart

 

[Lightbringer]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/16/leaks-fake-news-trump-washington-post/

The most interesting is that The Washington Post used "former intelligence officials" as primary sources. Now how would a former intelligence official know if they weren't in the meeting?

Does any liberal find that odd? Or are you so confounded with Trump hatred that details aren't relevant to you?

Even a current intelligence operative wouldn't be privy to anything they weren't cleared for.

 

[tsuke]

copy paste it