McMaster explains the fake news of the liberals

Darth Omar said:
Stop and think about that though.

What would Russia do with that kind of intelligence? The source [probably an individual] operates [probably lol] in Syria. And this individual has the most to fear from whom?

ISIS terrorists.

So, are the Russians going to communicate the name and location of this individual to ISIS? I can conceive of no circumstance where Russia would be motivated to do such a thing. Even if they used the asset, it would be against our common enemy, ISIS.

But maybe you can think of something.

Assuming, the anonymous sources are accurate and Trump unwittingly outted an asset and/or their location---that intelligence has little value to the Russians. The 'big deal' would be that Trump unwittingly revealed it.

Granted, not something you want to happen, but this story will be replaced by the next 'big deal' by this time next week.

In fact, I would wager that sort of thing has went on before [it would be interesting to know how many sources, that the Russians actually value, were exposed on Hillary's server] but things are different with Trump. There are anonymous people that are actively working against him.

That much is clear. The amount of leaking is unprecedented.
Click to expand...
excellent analysis on "what would Russia do" -- they are not going to go after him, they are not going to pass that on, they can use the anti-terrorism info
 
Amadeus said:
McMaster probably spoke the truth. But you guys are missing the point. It was never said that Trump revealed the sources, only that there is fear that Russia could discern the sources based on what they know.
Click to expand...

there is no such concern about liberals..........they will never discern the truth, no matter how much they know.....
 
Amadeus said:
Hope you realize that if Trump had a fisa warrant taken out on him, that means there was enough incriminating evidence against Trump that it met the legal threshold. It's kinda like confessing to a crime to prove your innocence.
Click to expand...

/shrugs.......nothing could be further from the truth.......I have been present at warrant "hearings" dozens of times, because they get top priority and they stop civil proceedings to put them on the record.....a police officer is sworn and and recites what they "believe" is going on and the judges issues the warrant.......no evidence at all is submitted to the judge, just the allegations.....
 
I think thing1 has lost his mind over Trump defeating Hillary. He used to be a serious debater on the left, now he's degraded to a shill.
 
You fools, Admits it this morning and his tweets. Poor McMaster, poor Rumppers!
 
{O said:
You have zero evidence beyond "anon sources of a second cousins one removed former boyfriend"

I have actual sources, actual real live people, that were in the room. Saying unequivocally that you are wrong.

The fact that they came out so declaratively is pretty telling this story will go no where. There is no evidence to contradict these claims. You listen to fake news. The same fake news that had you convinced clinton would win.
Click to expand...

New source, Donald Rump on Twitter this morning!
 
Amadeus said:
Hope you realize that if Trump had a fisa warrant taken out on him, that means there was enough incriminating evidence against Trump that it met the legal threshold. It's kinda like confessing to a crime to prove your innocence.
Click to expand...

Hardly. Fisa court supposedly has only refused a handful of warrants out tens of thousands requests.

Over the entire 33-year period, the FISA court granted 33,942 warrants, with only 12 denials – a rejection rate of 0.03 percent of the total requests.
 
anatta said:
excellent analysis on "what would Russia do" -- they are not going to go after him, they are not going to pass that on, they can use the anti-terrorism info
Click to expand...

What is with you guys?

It has NOTHING to do w/ what "Russia will do" with the knowledge. It has everything to do with giving away a vital source of intelligence.

You don't even understand what happened here. And you're just in full-on defend Trump mode
 
Thing1 said:
What is with you guys?

It has NOTHING to do w/ what "Russia will do" with the knowledge. It has everything to do with giving away a vital source of intelligence.

You don't even understand what happened here. And you're just in full-on defend Trump mode
Click to expand...


And you don't understand what happened and you are on full-on hate Trump mode. So.................

You and GayRod jump on every report and then demand a response. People reply logically and coherently and you scream "ALL YOU DO IS DEFEND TRUMP"

Let's assume that Trump told Russia something he wasn't supposed to. That obviously isn't good, but wasn't it compounded by the person who leaked it to the Washington Post? Isn't it compounded by wall to wall coverage of it? If there is really concern about the safety of assets, is it really in the best interests to be leaking to the Washington Post? Is that what you would do?

Additionally, do you really think Russia is in league with ISIS?

I mean this whole Russiaphobe thing of yours is actually quite laughable.
 
Thing1 said:
What is with you guys?

It has NOTHING to do w/ what "Russia will do" with the knowledge. It has everything to do with giving away a vital source of intelligence.

You don't even understand what happened here. And you're just in full-on defend Trump mode
Click to expand...
stop telling me what I understand or do not. It has much to do w/Russia or the story would only be mildly interesting.
Attach "RussiaGate" to anything in this hysterical time, and the Russiaphobes go nuts and scream about it.

I went over this last night night. you were there.
I mentioned the only (possible) thing wrong here was breaking diplomatic protocol.

It has nothing to do AT ALL w/ "giving away a vital source of intelligence.". Trump did not do that.

The fact WaPo PUBLISHED THIS does have everything to do with exposing the source -not Trumps
sharing the info with Lavrov.
Further WHERE THE LEAKING COMES FROM endangers National Security.

You are getting to be a troll..
pay attention,and quit repeating the same bullshit, when we've already gone over this
 
I Love America said:
And you don't understand what happened and you are on full-on hate Trump mode. So.................

You and GayRod jump on every report and then demand a response. People reply logically and coherently and you scream "ALL YOU DO IS DEFEND TRUMP"

Let's assume that Trump told Russia something he wasn't supposed to. That obviously isn't good, but wasn't it compounded by the person who leaked it to the Washington Post? Isn't it compounded by wall to wall coverage of it? If there is really concern about the safety of assets, is it really in the best interests to be leaking to the Washington Post? Is that what you would do?

Additionally, do you really think Russia is in league with ISIS?

I mean this whole Russiaphobe thing of yours is actually quite laughable.
Click to expand...

What is the "Russia in league" with ISIS thing? I swear - that just shows how much you do not understand about this.

WaPo did NOT leak the actual information. As for the guy who leaked it to WaPo - if he actually gave them the information, then yes, he compounded the leak. I'll be sure not to vote for him/her as President if I found out who he/she is & they ever run.
 
anatta said:
stop telling me what I understand or do not. It has much to do w/Russia or the story would only be mildly interesting.
Attach "RussiaGate" to anything in this hysterical time, and the Russiaphobes go nuts and scream about it.

I went over this last night night. you were there.
I mentioned the only (possible) thing wrong here was breaking diplomatic protocol.

It has nothing to do AT ALL w/ "giving away a vital source of intelligence.". Trump did not do that.

The fact WaPo PUBLISHED THIS does have everything to do with exposing the source -not Trumps
sharing the info with Lavrov.
Further WHERE THE LEAKING COMES FROM endangers National Security.

You are getting to be a troll..
pay attention,and quit repeating the same bullshit, when we've already gone over this
Click to expand...

Based on the information he gave away, they said that it could possibly be deduced who the source of that information is. That is why information like that is kept confidential.

Ergo - you really do not know what you're talking about.
 
So, now it looks like Trump basically admitted to the "fake news story" on twitter. And once again threw surrogates under the bus.

Oh - and made this thread look even more ridiculous.
 
Thing1 said:
What is the "Russia in league" with ISIS thing? I swear - that just shows how much you do not understand about this.

WaPo did NOT leak the actual information. As for the guy who leaked it to WaPo - if he actually gave them the information, then yes, he compounded the leak. I'll be sure not to vote for him/her as President if I found out who he/she is & they ever run.
Click to expand...


tenor.gif
 
Thing1 said:
Based on the information he gave away, they said that it could possibly be deduced who the source of that information is. That is why information like that is kept confidential.

Ergo - you really do not know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...


BREATHE SNOWFLAKE BREATHE

tenor.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top