McMaster explains the fake news of the liberals

pretty declarative. If there were evidence to the contrary he wouldn't put himself (and the sec. of state) out there like this in such an affirmative fashion.

No dodging, no mincing words.

Liberals made up more fake news. It's pretty obvious.

Real people in high positions of power with actual reputations actually going in front of cameras and making declarative statements > bullshit fake anon sources.
 
You have zero evidence beyond "anon sources of a second cousins one removed former boyfriend"

I have actual sources, actual real live people, that were in the room. Saying unequivocally that you are wrong.

The fact that they came out so declaratively is pretty telling this story will go no where. There is no evidence to contradict these claims. You listen to fake news. The same fake news that had you convinced clinton would win.
 
{O said:
You have zero evidence beyond "anon sources of a second cousins one removed former boyfriend"

I have actual sources, actual real live people, that were in the room. Saying unequivocally that you are wrong.

The fact that they came out so declaratively is pretty telling this story will go no where. There is no evidence to contradict these claims. You listen to fake news. The same fake news that had you convinced clinton would win.
Click to expand...

Wow, man. You're all in on that narrative.

That's a shame.
 
It's a shame I don't listen to fake news? How about you try contributing something more than "shame shame shame" when it comes to my threads. So far you've offered up squat.
 
Thing1 said:
Wow, man. You're all in on that narrative.

That's a shame.
Click to expand...

trump has actually offered evidence of the obama wiretapped trump thing with the fisa warrants, unmasking, and increased distribution. All there is with russiagate is some trump officials spoke with russians. When they have had business dealings with the very same people in the past.
 
McMaster probably spoke the truth. But you guys are missing the point. It was never said that Trump revealed the sources, only that there is fear that Russia could discern the sources based on what they know.
 
tsuke said:
trump has actually offered evidence of the obama wiretapped trump thing with the fisa warrants, unmasking, and increased distribution. All there is with russiagate is some trump officials spoke with russians. When they have had business dealings with the very same people in the past.
Click to expand...

Hope you realize that if Trump had a fisa warrant taken out on him, that means there was enough incriminating evidence against Trump that it met the legal threshold. It's kinda like confessing to a crime to prove your innocence.
 
Amadeus said:
Hope you realize that if Trump had a fisa warrant taken out on him, that means there was enough incriminating evidence against Trump that it met the legal threshold. It's kinda like confessing to a crime to prove your innocence.
Click to expand...

i hope you realize as well that the fisa court is as close to a rubber stamp as we are going to get only denying 11 out of 35000 requests since it started. 2 of those 11 denials were in the Trump situation as the first judge turned down obama and he had to find a more friendly one.
 
iQPC6am.png


WashingtonPost is fake news.
 
{O said:
lol someone actually said if a FISA warrant is issued it means something lol
Click to expand...

im actually amazed at the level of trust liberals have with the government. Its like they feel nothing can go wrong with a secret court.
 
Amadeus said:
McMaster probably spoke the truth. But you guys are missing the point. It was never said that Trump revealed the sources, only that there is fear that Russia could discern the sources based on what they know.
Click to expand...

Stop and think about that though.

What would Russia do with that kind of intelligence? The source [probably an individual] operates [probably lol] in Syria. And this individual has the most to fear from whom?

ISIS terrorists.

So, are the Russians going to communicate the name and location of this individual to ISIS? I can conceive of no circumstance where Russia would be motivated to do such a thing. Even if they used the asset, it would be against our common enemy, ISIS.

But maybe you can think of something.

Assuming, the anonymous sources are accurate and Trump unwittingly outted an asset and/or their location---that intelligence has little value to the Russians. The 'big deal' would be that Trump unwittingly revealed it.

Granted, not something you want to happen, but this story will be replaced by the next 'big deal' by this time next week.

In fact, I would wager that sort of thing has went on before [it would be interesting to know how many sources, that the Russians actually value, were exposed on Hillary's server] but things are different with Trump. There are anonymous people that are actively working against him.

That much is clear. The amount of leaking is unprecedented.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top