Russiagate Shrinks to Flynngate

what is "real"about it raisin brain? If it's NEVER ENFORCED how it it real?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that details the fine and/or imprisonment of unauthorized citizens who negotiate with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position.[2] The Act was passed following George Logan's unauthorized negotiations with France in 1798, and was signed into law by President John Adams on January 30, 1799. The Act was last amended in 1994, and violation of the Logan Act is a felony.

To date, only one person has ever been indicted for violating the Act's provisions.
However, no person has ever been prosecuted for alleged violations of the Act.

Ever heard of yet you dumb cunt?
 
i'll be damned..look at this: Yates kpt saying she had to warn of Flynn's being open to blackmail -but never WHY.
doesthis have something to do with that -and what's the point of her pointing out the Logan Act.?

On December 29, 2016, retired lieutenant general Michael T. Flynn, President-elect Trump's pick for national security adviser, spoke with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the exact same day the Obama administration announced retaliatory measures in response to Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.[20] At the time, Acting US Attorney General Sally Yates, along with senior national security officials suspected that Flynn might have violated the Logan Act with those conversations
 
what is "real"about it raisin brain? If it's NEVER ENFORCED how it it real?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that details the fine and/or imprisonment of unauthorized citizens who negotiate with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position.[2] The Act was passed following George Logan's unauthorized negotiations with France in 1798, and was signed into law by President John Adams on January 30, 1799. The Act was last amended in 1994, and violation of the Logan Act is a felony.

To date, only one person has ever been indicted for violating the Act's provisions.
However, no person has ever been prosecuted for alleged violations of the Act.

That may be true, but the left wants their pound of flesh over the election.
 
remember when these liberal retards thought trump was going to be impeached and was getting golden showers? lmao they will believe anything

They still believe he will be impeached. Or hope that is.

What is odd is that Trump isn't a true believer from a conservative standpoint. So one has to wonder why they would want Pence?

Or are they so stupid they think Hillary will be tapped to finish out the term?
 
They still believe he will be impeached. Or hope that is.

What is odd is that Trump isn't a true believer from a conservative standpoint. So one has to wonder why they would want Pence?

Or are they so stupid they think Hillary will be tapped to finish out the term?

Pence is predictable, and while not very intelligent seemingly free of the vast array of mental illnesses plaguing the Donald.
 
They still believe he will be impeached. Or hope that is.

What is odd is that Trump isn't a true believer from a conservative standpoint. So one has to wonder why they would want Pence?

Or are they so stupid they think Hillary will be tapped to finish out the term?

There's Pence who would be their religious conservative nightmare.

But think of the blowback from Trump supporters: If they think the left is energized over Trump's election they haven't seen anything.
 
From your link RETARD; purpose; Federal law enforcement.

Fucking idiot.
keep digging in that hole..you are amazingly ignorant.
If I was anywhere near your stupidity quotient i'd hide under the bed all day.

This is what you said since you can't seem to remember:

Originally Posted by Rune
Oh, so sorry RETARD. The FBI ONLY does criminal investigations.
You can stop lying any day now.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-comey-testimony-htmlstory.html
Comey suggested that the case was not a criminal investigation but was being conducted as part of FBI's "counterintelligence mission," aimed at preventing Russia intelligence operations against the U.S.
 
keep digging in that hole..you are amazingly ignorant.
If I was anywhere your stupidity quotient i'd hide under the bed all day.

This is what you said since you can't seem to remember:



http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-comey-testimony-htmlstory.html
Comey suggested that the case was not a criminal investigation but was being conducted as part of FBI's "counterintelligence mission," aimed at preventing Russia intelligence operations against the U.S.

Comey stuck a knife in it with that.
 
Comey stuck a knife in it with that.
well it doesn't mean there can't be criminal charges brought-but it's not being looked at by the FBI's
Criminal Investigation Division..

The focus ( i guess) would be on the Russian intelligence agencies (?) -
 
It's just funny because your hero keeps trying to blame Obama for Flynn.

You don't seem to have noticed yet, but you will: the buck stops virtually anywhere but Trump's desk. He's incapable of admitting he is wrong, or accepting blame for anything. If you weren't so blinded by devotion, that would be pretty easy for you to spot.

Just about everything he is accused of doing he did when Obama was in office....Obama took no action against him....

why would the incoming pres. do anything without investigating the accusations ....?

No 'bucks' ever made it to Obama's desk....he blamed Bush for everything and Republicans in Congress....
 
LOL...You mean the Dem's pushing Russia gate-yes it is. Keep waiting for that Russian collusion...any day now..

NO .. he means you.

New day .. same you posting another thread about how awful and useless this investigation is .. and I haven't looked through the thread yet, but I'm betting that Hillary Clinton's name lies somewhere within.

They are being thorough in this investigation, but you seem real anxious for this to hurry up and be over with.

Why is that?

What is the damage caused by a thorough investigation?
 
Back
Top