Russiagate Shrinks to Flynngate

It began with the left accusing Trump of 'collusion' with the Russians....

Cite. I found this comment from Adam Schiff in which he was responding to Cuomo's use of collusion.

CUOMO: No proof -- no proof Peter King says. I have seen no proof of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Carter Page says the allegations are laughable. What do you say?

SCHIFF: Well, Carter Page is a person of interest to the community and probably likely to come before the committee, so I don't want to comment on anything he's had to say in particular.

But I do think we need to get to the bottom of these allegations of collusion or coordination. I have to disagree with my colleague in terms of whether there is any evidence of collusion. I believe that there is.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._premature_to_say_there_will_be_no_proof.html
 
But I do think we need to get to the bottom of these allegations of collusion or coordination. I have to disagree with my colleague in terms of whether there is any evidence of collusion. I believe that there is.
this is all of the politics at stake. Russian meddling otherwise is the same as it ever was.
 
Seriously lol?
Collusion Gate is the focal point of The Resistance, for crying out loud.
Thing is out to lunch on this.
Last night domer said why can't i get over Hillary -this after she goes on TV and does speeches-
and blames everyone else.

They like a narrative, except when the narrative falls apart
 
what IS YOUR PROBLEM?? Have you watch the News lately ?
What did we just go thru yesterday? It's all over the cable news shows today..

It's been going on since July with the FBI, and since Jan 20th with Congress...
Is this not current events?

thing1 doesn't like being proven wrong... again and again and again.
 
what IS YOUR PROBLEM?? Have you watch the News lately ?
What did we just go thru yesterday? It's all over the cable news shows today..

It's been going on since July with the FBI, and since Jan 20th with Congress...
Is this not current events?

Doesn't mean up need to crap post about it in a new thread every fucking day.
Your desperation is not apealling.
 
Trump was no doubt loyal to Flynn,and Trump valued his endorsement.. Did Trump cling to Flynn too long? Ok


there was nothing wrong with having a conversation -even about sanctions. nobody cares about the Logan act -
it's normative for an NSA guy to reach out to foreign ambassadors


he did not disclose the RT payments ( if I recall) and did not register as a Russian foreign agent


obviously Trump did not know


probably a few, maybe a few. being "paid" is not a problem, anymore then the Clinton Foundation taking donor money while she was Sec. of State..there has to be a quid pro quo -
surely you recall this from the campaign with Hillary access given to donors


immaterial..again unless there was that quid.

Wrong wrong and wrong.
The Logan act is very real.
What you meant is you don't care.
 
remember when these liberal retards thought trump was going to be impeached and was getting golden showers? lmao they will believe anything
 
Wrong wrong and wrong.
The Logan act is very real.
What you meant is you don't care.
what is "real"about it raisin brain? If it's NEVER ENFORCED how it it real?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that details the fine and/or imprisonment of unauthorized citizens who negotiate with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position.[2] The Act was passed following George Logan's unauthorized negotiations with France in 1798, and was signed into law by President John Adams on January 30, 1799. The Act was last amended in 1994, and violation of the Logan Act is a felony.

To date, only one person has ever been indicted for violating the Act's provisions.
However, no person has ever been prosecuted for alleged violations of the Act.
 
Back
Top