Baby Powder Causes Cancer?

Milagro said:
This is a prime example of typical cockeyed thinking that seems to happen all the time. Over one million people mostly children and young adults die each year from malaria in Africa alone. Yet here you are spouting the same old bullshit as Rachel Carson in Silent Spring. In the years since its publication it has been estimated that over 50 million have died. So kindly please shut the fuck up, you really don't have a clue!!

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1259

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You have no data to suggest that DDT is not a carcinogen. Further, you have no data to disprove the fact that it created severe issues with the shells of raptor eggs. You can put BT in standing water to kill mosquitoes.
 
evince said:
denying science again in no basis
Click to expand...
Given that asbestos...which isn't even in talc used for baby powder...doesn't dissolve, how can it make it's way from the exterior of the vagina, up the fallopian tubes, and into the ovaries?
 
Althea said:
You have no data to suggest that DDT is not a carcinogen. Further, you have no data to disprove the fact that it created severe issues with the shells of raptor eggs. You can put BT in standing water to kill mosquitoes.
Click to expand...

They are now using DDT again in places like South Africa because they refuse to listen to stupid Americans who are totally incapable of intelligent risk analysis. This case of talc causing ovarian cancer is just typical of the mass hysteria that afflicts you people from time to time. Evince is a congenital fuckwit, but thought that you were far more intelligent.

http://www.cfact.org/2011/05/23/ddt-is-a-potent-weapon-against-malaria/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Althea said:
Given that asbestos...which isn't even in talc used for baby powder...doesn't dissolve, how can it make it's way from the exterior of the vagina, up the fallopian tubes, and into the ovaries?
Click to expand...

It can't, the whole thing is just total bullshit. If it truly were carcinogenic then it is far more likely to cause vaginal or uterine cancer surely!!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
This is a prime example of typical cockeyed thinking that seems to happen all the time. Over one million people mostly children and young adults die each year from malaria in Africa alone. Yet here you are spouting the same old bullshit as Rachel Carson in Silent Spring. In the years since its publication it has been estimated that over 50 million have died. So kindly please shut the fuck up, you really don't have a clue!!

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1259

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

DDT isn't necessarily banned everywhere. Numerous African countries still use it routinely.
 
Milagro said:
They are now using DDT again in places like South Africa because they refuse to listen to stupid Americans who are totally incapable of intelligent risk analysis. This case of talc causing ovarian cancer is just typical of the mass hysteria that afflicts you people from time to time. Evince is a congenital fuckwit, but thought that you were far more intelligent.

http://www.cfact.org/2011/05/23/ddt-is-a-potent-weapon-against-malaria/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Well. they're getting the added benefit of reduced births in Africa as a result of renewed DDT use. Unfortunately, they're also getting birth defects too. BT is more effective in killing larvae in standing water, with no ill effects. I'm sure chemical companies are bribing govts. in order to sell more toxic DDT.
 
Althea said:
Well. they're getting the added benefit of reduced births in Africa as a result of renewed DDT use. Unfortunately, they're also getting birth defects too. BT is more effective in killing larvae in standing water, with no ill effects. I'm sure chemical companies are bribing govts. in order to sell more toxic DDT.
Click to expand...
A million people mostly babies and children suffer the worst birth defect of all, they die from malaria. Why are you people so incapable of applying risk analysis to any situation?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
evince said:
fuck is your brain easy for idiots to rent cheap



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discover_the_Networks









Discover the Networks (originally Discover the Network) is a website run by the David Horowitz Freedom Center that focuses on the individuals, groups, and history of groups alleged to be political left wing (e.g., the network of tax-exempt groups and politicians funded by George Soros it collectively labels "The Shadow Party"). DtN was launched in 2004 and has a staff of about a dozen contributors. Its current Editor-in-Chief is David Horowitz; John Perazzo is the project's managing editor, and Richard Poe is its investigative editor. Discover the Network is associated with FrontPageMag.com.
According to the project's mission statement, Discover the Network's goal is to provide a comprehensive "guide to the political left" covering "the individuals and organizations that make up the left and also the institutions that fund and sustain it."[1][2] The project also seeks to "define the left's...programmatic agendas," which it contends are often concealed. The project's contributors contend that the political left in the United States commonly applies a "deceptive public presentation" of itself that conceals a network of affiliations and shared political views with "radical agendas". It views these as communist, socialist, environmentalist, "anti-capitalist", and "anti-American" causes.[1][3] The website is meant to be the conservative analog of left-leaning websites that compile lists that include conservatives such as those created by Southern Poverty Law Center and Media Matters.[4]
The website has been criticized for including leftists on the same list as Islamists.[4] Horowitz, who wrote about the alleged connection between these groups in his book Unholy Alliance, says "that groups who despise one another might actually be working closely together, maybe without even knowing it." It's not what they are for but that they are "linked by anti-Americanism" that accounts for their being in alignment on the political front.[4] Tim Wise, who is listed in Discover the Networks, objects to being linked to Saddam Hussein in his opposition to George W. Bush's Iraq policy.[5] Dean Saitta objects to being described as a supporter of Ward Churchill.[6]
Click to expand...

his source is crap
 
Milagro said:
A million people mostly babies and children suffer the worst birth defect of all, they die from malaria. Why are you people so incapable of applying risk analysis to any situation?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You don't think killing larvae in standing water would help?
 
Milagro said:
A million people mostly babies and children suffer the worst birth defect of all, they die from malaria. Why are you people so incapable of applying risk analysis to any situation?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Nobody really cares about S.Africa anyway, so as long as they don't use DDT here, I'm fine. In fact, they can use it in Red states all they want. We don't need it in the Northeast.
 
Althea said:
You don't think killing larvae in standing water would help?
Click to expand...
Malarial mosquitos have developed resistance to many of the insecticides previously used. So much so that a mere handful have any efficacy now. DDT is still astonishingly effective although there are pockets of Africa where the mosquito population is becoming resistant. It has to be used wisely and sparingly to ensure that it continues to be effective in years to come.


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
Nobody really cares about S.Africa anyway, so as long as they don't use DDT here, I'm fine. In fact, they can use it in Red states all they want. We don't need it in the Northeast.
Click to expand...
So what the fuck are you going on about then?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
Malarial mosquitos have developed resistance to many of the insecticides previously used. So much so that a mere handful have any efficacy now. DDT is still astonishingly effective although there are pockets of Africa where the mosquito population is becoming resistant. It has to be used wisely and sparingly to ensure that it continues to be effective in years to come.


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
BT is not a chemical insecticide, and is highly effective against mosquitoes.
 
Althea said:
BT is not a chemical insecticide, and is highly effective against mosquitoes.
Click to expand...

Are you talking about bacillus thuringiensis?

Integrated Pest Management

You may want to use Bti along with other control methods, depending on your specific circumstances. It kills larvae, but it's usually not enough to get rid of*all*the adult mosquitoes in an area. Since they grow quickly, in a week or less, some may manage to go through the larval stage before or after the Bti is applied. Also, even Bti won't necessarily eliminate every larva, especially if their breeding area is a large marsh, or inaccessible to treatment, such as tiny scattered puddles, trash or treeholes. It's also less effective at eradicating mosquito larvae in water with a lot of organic matter or pollution, such as swamps, brackish ditches or cesspools.

Then there's the problem of mosquitoes from elsewhere. Adults of some species may fly for miles looking for blood, even if you could eliminate all the ones that hatched nearby.

http://www.mosquitoreviews.com/bacillus-thuringiensis-bti.html







Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top