IT gets worse for Rumps choice for NSA Flynn

Yaya said:
Okay. I still wouldn't compare the investigations.

At this point, unlike Thingy's (false) claim that 16 intelligence agencies started this, all we have is pure speculation that Trump colluded with Russia while he campaigned. I have no problem with the investigation, but I wonder how long it will go on and if nothing is ever found, will you admit there was no collusion?
Click to expand...

I never used the word "collusion" in my comments because I just don't know. I've said there was meddling, interfering and hacking. That's why I welcome an investigation, to put everything to rest one way or another.
 
christiefan915 said:
I used to hate all the ongoing criticism of Hillary even after the election was over but now I welcome it. Because it shows me that none of you can say anything positive about trump, and all you have is the "but, Hillary" comeback when anyone criticizes him.
Click to expand...

do we need anything else?......I mean seriously......I don't care WHAT Trump does for the next four years......he filled all my hopes and dreams on election day.........
 
christiefan915 said:
I never used the word "collusion" in my comments because I just don't know. I've said there was meddling, interfering and hacking. That's why I welcome an investigation, to put everything to rest one way or another.
Click to expand...

Russia did hack the DNC, that is a fact. And it didn't bode well for the DNC. I don't like that they hacked, but I find it as bad that Dems want to ignore the information that was hacked. Snowden brought to light things the US, under Obama, didn't want to come to light. But I'm glad it did, though that doesn't mean I approve of espionage.

As to collusion, yeah, I'm for the investigation. But I think it is going to turn up zero evidence or proof of collusion.
 
christiefan915 said:
Then that makes you a sheep.
Click to expand...

Ha, indeed.

Being against Hillary Clinton is not a viable, or intelligent political ideology.
Perhaps explaining why our message board contingent of wingnuts tend to almost always be ill informed, boring, unintelligent, and insipid??
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
you overlook the fact that every single investigation concluded that she lied to the American public when she said that a video was to blame for the attack.....you're right that they were bipartisan investigations......
Click to expand...

She never said that, you know that but you're a lying shit
 
Cypress said:
Ha, indeed.

Being against Hillary Clinton is not a viable, or intelligent political ideology.
Perhaps explaining why our message board contingent of wingnuts tend to almost always be ill informed, boring, unintelligent, and insipid??
Click to expand...

Absolutely. :)
 
Jarod said:
She never said that, you know that but you're a lying shit
Click to expand...

Nope, Hillary never said that. But even if she had, why is it such a big deal to them? After all the Charlie Hebdo satires were responsible for the Paris attack in 2015 so it's not impossible that a movie critical of Islam could have set off terrorists.
 
Cypress said:
Ha, indeed.

Being against Hillary Clinton is not a viable, or intelligent political ideology.
Perhaps explaining why our message board contingent of wingnuts tend to almost always be ill informed, boring, unintelligent, and insipid??
Click to expand...
Cypress is Robin the boy blunder!
a6f1907199ed5d72475be14fd575cd18.jpg


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Cypress said:
Ha, indeed.

Being against Hillary Clinton is not a viable, or intelligent political ideology.
Perhaps explaining why our message board contingent of wingnuts tend to almost always be ill informed, boring, unintelligent, and insipid??
Click to expand...

lol......a demmycrat talking about intelligent political ideology.......that's sort of like an atheist talking about religious doctrine, isn't it?.......
 
christiefan915 said:
I used to hate all the ongoing criticism of Hillary even after the election was over but now I welcome it. Because it shows me that none of you can say anything positive about trump, and all you have is the "but, Hillary" comeback when anyone criticizes him.
Click to expand...

Trump voters made Hillary irrelevant.

But she's relevant to the political aspect of this issue because the lefts motivation is 100% political. If the left cared about honesty or sketchy dealings with Russians they and their media minions would have rode her out of town. But they did everything they could do to defend her.
 
Darth Omar said:
Trump voters made Hillary irrelevant.

But she's relevant to the political aspect of this issue because the lefts motivation is 100% political. If the left cared about honesty or sketchy dealings with Russians they and their media minions would have rode her out of town. But they did everything they could do to defend her.
Click to expand...

She committed no crimes, so far we know Flynn did!
 
Jarod said:
Imagine the outrage if Obama's national security advisor had committed a felony by colluding with and getting paid by Russia
Click to expand...

I think Gayrod is proving that Russiagate is dying on the vine

Keep flailing Gayrod

Did Flynn let an ambassador get slaughtered and blame a video?
 
I Love America said:
I think Gayrod is proving that Russiagate is dying on the vine

Keep flailing Gayrod

Did Flynn let an ambassador get slaughtered and blame a video?
Click to expand...

No, neither did Hillary. After millions of dollars worth of investigation it was proven that that has been a constant life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top