cancel2 2022
Canceled
So why was there a Congressional hearing where three sceptical climatologists tried to take that charlatan Michael Mann to task? You just refuse point blank to discuss that.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
march for science
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Climatologists have turned "peer review" into a "good ole boy" club.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
You trot out the same old tired screed everytime, it is textbook Naomi Oreskes and she is barking mad. Why don't you address the issues raised in my thread?
"A group of prominent US climate experts have told a Congressional committee hearing that climate science is dysfunctional, beset by bias and groupthink, and is using a profoundly unscientific approach. Speaking before the U.S. House*Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Professor John Christy told representatives that “consensus science”, as practiced by much of mainstream climatology, was “not science” at all, while Professor Judith Curry explained that “self-deception” had got the better of far too many climatologists.
Both concluded that there had been a wholesale failure to use the scientific method in climatology, something that could only be put right by the introduction of official “red teams” – groups of eminent scientists, who would be asked to challenge and provide dissenting opinions on official climate assessments.
Professor Christy said: “Congress needs a parallel, scientifically-based assessment of the state of climate science. Many important issues are left out of government-directed climate reports entirely; our policymakers need to see the entire range of findings regarding climate change”
The testimony of all four climatologists who spoke at the congressional hearings, including the dissenting views of Professor Michael Mann, are being republished by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the London-based think tank which seeks to enhance the public debates on climate science and policy."
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?p=1886024
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Mott goes on about "authoritarianism that demands conformity and ostracizes heretics who don't conform".
Almost too much irony all at once lol.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Mott is a socialist authoritarian.
I have no idea , but it describes tree-hugging, fear-mongering ignorant lefties with all their chicken little fables about climate and who end up hating the realists.
Last edited:
For once, you are correct.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
Trump pledges to protect environment while reducing ‘burdens’ on workers?
President Donald Trump says in an Earth Day statement that his administration is ‘‘committed to keeping our air and water clean, to preserving our forests, lakes and open spaces and to protecting endangered species.’’
But that won’t be done, he says, in a way that harms ‘‘working families’’ and says the government is ‘‘reducing unnecessary burdens on American workers and American companies, while being mindful that our actions must also protect the environment.’’
His comments come as thousands of people around the world participate in science rallies, many of them in protest of his policies.
Read the full statement:
“Our Nation is blessed with abundant natural resources and awe-inspiring beauty. Americans are rightly grateful for these God-given gifts and have an obligation to safeguard them for future generations. My Administration is committed to keeping our air and water clean, to preserving our forests, lakes, and open spaces, and to protecting endangered species.
“Economic growth enhances environmental protection. We can and must protect our environment without harming America’s working families. That is why my Administration is reducing unnecessary burdens on American workers and American companies, while being mindful that our actions must also protect the environment.
“Rigorous science is critical to my Administration’s efforts to achieve the twin goals of economic growth and environmental protection. My Administration is committed to advancing scientific research that leads to a better understanding of our environment and of environmental risks. As we do so, we should remember that rigorous science depends not on ideology, but on a spirit of honest inquiry and robust debate.
This April 22nd, as we observe Earth Day, I hope that our Nation can come together to give thanks for the land we all love and call home.”
MSN News
President Donald Trump says in an Earth Day statement that his administration is ‘‘committed to keeping our air and water clean, to preserving our forests, lakes and open spaces and to protecting endangered species.’’
But that won’t be done, he says, in a way that harms ‘‘working families’’ and says the government is ‘‘reducing unnecessary burdens on American workers and American companies, while being mindful that our actions must also protect the environment.’’
His comments come as thousands of people around the world participate in science rallies, many of them in protest of his policies.
Read the full statement:
“Our Nation is blessed with abundant natural resources and awe-inspiring beauty. Americans are rightly grateful for these God-given gifts and have an obligation to safeguard them for future generations. My Administration is committed to keeping our air and water clean, to preserving our forests, lakes, and open spaces, and to protecting endangered species.
“Economic growth enhances environmental protection. We can and must protect our environment without harming America’s working families. That is why my Administration is reducing unnecessary burdens on American workers and American companies, while being mindful that our actions must also protect the environment.
“Rigorous science is critical to my Administration’s efforts to achieve the twin goals of economic growth and environmental protection. My Administration is committed to advancing scientific research that leads to a better understanding of our environment and of environmental risks. As we do so, we should remember that rigorous science depends not on ideology, but on a spirit of honest inquiry and robust debate.
This April 22nd, as we observe Earth Day, I hope that our Nation can come together to give thanks for the land we all love and call home.”
MSN News
Nope, that criticism applies to all science, not just climate science. But you select climate science for that rebuke because you are a partisan based on politics. Fail.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So why was there a Congressional hearing where three sceptical climatologists tried to take that charlatan Michael Mann to task? You just refuse point blank to discuss that.
Yes it always makes me laugh when somebody here talks about peer review as if it's some magical process. All too often, especially in climate science, it has been turned into a farce.
http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/08
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
The way it's set up, would create a siphoning effect.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
cancel2 2022
Canceled
He can't spell Rembrandt correctly though!And you are correct - give that man a cigar.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
William Happer, who is favourite to become Trump's Science Advisor, is a true intellectual giant in a world of mental pygmies.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ce-adviser-william-happer-climate-change-cult
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
evince
Truthmatters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Happer#Views
his opinions on global warming are in the MINORITY
why cant you idiots calculate that one
his opinions on global warming are in the MINORITY
why cant you idiots calculate that one
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So what? Even if that is true, which is isn't, science is not a talent contest where the most votes wins. It is not PC and there are no consolation prizes for coming second. If you weren't so partisan and impervious to anything outside your little world then you'd listen to somebody like climatologist Judith Curry on global warming.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited: