Wrong, there was a movie with Jodi Foster.how can you say that......90% of Americans wouldn't even know about safe rooms if it wasn't for colleges today.......
Wrong, there was a movie with Jodi Foster.how can you say that......90% of Americans wouldn't even know about safe rooms if it wasn't for colleges today.......
It's not an assumption; it's a fact that Topspin used that same logical fallacy lol
Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent
Satoshi Kanazawa
First Published February 16, 2010
PDF download for Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent Article Information
Article has an altmetric score of 221 No Access
Abstract
The origin of values and preferences is an unresolved theoretical question in behavioral and social sciences. The Savanna-IQ Interaction Hypothesis, derived from the Savanna Principle and a theory of the evolution of general intelligence, suggests that more intelligent individuals may be more likely to acquire and espouse evolutionarily novel values and preferences (such as liberalism and atheism and, for men, sexual exclusivity) than less intelligent individuals, but that general intelligence may have no effect on the acquisition and espousal of evolutionarily familiar values (for children, marriage, family, and friends). The analyses of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Study 1) and the General Social Surveys (Study 2) show that adolescent and adult intelligence significantly increases adult liberalism, atheism, and men’s (but not women’s) value on sexual exclusivity.
References
Ackerman Phillip L., Heggestad Eric D. 1997. “Intelligence, Personality, and Interests: Evidence for Overlapping Traits.” Psychological Bulletin 121:219–45. Google Scholar Medline
......f
Zagar Robert, Mead John D. 1983. “Analysis of Short Test Battery for Children.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 39:590–7. Google Scholar
Good for Topspin. An accurate observer.
You seem to have missed the term "logical fallacy" lol
No logical fallacy when the observation is of people who denigrate higher education. They never got one. Hence, the GED reference.
Thanks for giving me another chance to out your chronic ignorance.
ad hominem
You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.
Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes as a way to discredit their argument. The result of an ad hom attack can be to undermine someone's case without actually having to engage with it.
Example: After Sally presents an eloquent and compelling case for a more equitable taxation system, Sam asks the audience whether we should believe anything from a woman who isn't married, was once arrested, and smells a bit weird.
Wrong, there was a movie with Jodi Foster.
From the Genomics Research Centre:
Humans are born with 46 chromosomes in 23 pairs. The X and Y chromosomes determine a person’s sex. Most women are 46XX and most men are 46XY. Research suggests, however, that in a few births per thousand some individuals will be born with a single sex chromosome (45X or 45Y) (sex monosomies) and some with three or more sex chromosomes (47XXX, 47XYY or 47XXY, etc.) (sex polysomies). In addition, some males are born 46XX due to the translocation of a tiny section of the sex determining region of the Y chromosome. Similarly some females are also born 46XY due to mutations in the Y chromosome. Clearly, there are not only females who are XX and males who are XY, but rather, there is a range of chromosome complements, hormone balances, and phenotypic variations that determine sex.
http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html
Most women are 46XX ...
A Diploma Is a Participation Trophy
No, Diploma Dumbos are worse. At least the hillbillies know what they know, while mind-slaves who run away to college only think they know what they know. The phrase we are told to repeat, "Smart in School, Dumb in Real Life" is a typically misleading half-truth. Most college graduates are dumb in school; cramming for exams only gives temporary knowledge. They come out of their indentured-sevitude ordeal with a 6th Grader's knowledge of grammar, history, and logic.
Apparently you didn't understand your mistake that I tried to point out subtly, so let me be more direct.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
So they are freaks?
Thanks
Desh, domer and BucKKle approve this thread......because they are intelligent liberal atheists........
Apparently, you fail to understand my reference to people who denigrate higher education.
THEY DIDN'T GET ONE.
Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
The pay differential between college grads and not proves you wrong.
All those subjects are available in college. Plus if the go to college, they definitionally have achieved 12th grade skills. I think your student loan debt burden has made you bitter.
That proves nothing about whether they deserve their pay. College "education" is for no-talent brownnoses. If students aren't paid a salary there, they aren't worth anything. It puts inferior people in superior positions. The people under them, and the economy in general, have to suffer under the bootlickers' incompetence. Their bosses are on an ego trip; they don't care about talent, only about how much someone has humiliated himself in order to make money for them.
You probably know that; it is too obviously logical to miss. So what you're really saying is that "Here's a way to cheat, and you're a fool if you don't." But I saw it as being in a situation like if you lived on bread and water for four years, you could eat free in gourmet restaurants the rest of your life. The permanent indigestion caused by the sacrifice would ruin the reward.
I'm unpersuaded that my simple point isn't better than your convoluted mental gymnastics.
That proves nothing about whether they deserve their pay. College "education" is for no-talent brownnoses. If students aren't paid a salary there, they aren't worth anything. It puts inferior people in superior positions. The people under them, and the economy in general, have to suffer under the bootlickers' incompetence. Their bosses are on an ego trip; they don't care about talent, only about how much someone has humiliated himself in order to make money for them.
You probably know that; it is too obviously logical to miss. So what you're really saying is that "Here's a way to cheat, and you're a fool if you don't." But I saw it as being in a situation like if you lived on bread and water for four years, you could eat free in gourmet restaurants the rest of your life. The permanent indigestion caused by the sacrifice would ruin the reward.