Tillerson and Putin Find Little More Than Disagreement in Meeting

anatta

100% recycled karma
MOSCOW — Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson met with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia for nearly two hours Wednesday, but the two men appeared unable to agree on the facts involving the deadly chemical weapons assault on Syrian civilians or Russian interference in the American election — much less move toward an improvement in basic relations.

“There is a low level of trust between our countries,” Mr. Tillerson told reporters at a joint news conference with his Russian counterpart, Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov, after the first face-to-face meetings between Russian leaders and a top emissary of the Trump administration.

“The world’s two foremost nuclear powers cannot have this kind of relationship,” Mr. Tillerson said.

Both he and Mr. Lavrov said a range of issues were discussed — most notably the crises in Syria, North Korea and Ukraine — and that both sides had agreed to establish a working group to examine, as Mr. Lavrov said, “the irritants” in relations between the United States and Russia.

Mr. Tillerson reiterated the American view that President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, Russia’s chief Middle East ally, was responsible for the chemical weapons assault in northern Syria on April 4 that left more than 80 people dead, sickened hundreds and outraged the world.

Mr. Lavrov reiterated the Russian view that the facts about the chemical weapons attack had yet to be determined, and denounced what he described as the “media hysteria” surrounding the assault.

Asked about President Trump’s description of Mr. Assad as an “animal,” Mr. Tillerson said that characterization “is one that Assad has brought upon himself.”

Mr. Tillerson said Russian interference in the presidential election was a settled fact. In response, Mr. Lavrov gave what amounted to a long lecture on what he described as an extensive list of American efforts to achieve “regime change” around the world, from Serbia to Iraq to Libya. He described them all as failures — an implicit warning against any efforts to achieve the same end in Syria.

For hours after Mr. Tillerson’s arrival in Moscow, it was unclear whether Mr. Putin would even meet with him because of the tense state of relations, which has have worsened just in the past few weeks.

Their meeting lasted almost two hours and ended just before 8 p.m. local time.

In the 24 hours before Mr. Tillerson landed in Moscow, the White House accused Mr. Putin’s government of covering up evidence that Mr. Assad had been responsible for sarin gas attacks on its own people, launched from a base where Russian troops are operating.

Mr. Putin shot back that the charge was fabricated and accused the administration of President Trump, who American intelligence agencies believe benefited from Russian cyberattacks intended to embarrass his Democratic rival during the election campaign, of fabricating the evidence to create a fake confrontation.

“This reminds me very much of the events of 2003, when U.S. representatives in the Security Council showed alleged chemical weapons discovered in Iraq,” Mr. Putin said, referring to an intelligence failure that Mr. Trump has also cited in recent months. “The exact same thing is happening now,” he charged.

He quoted two Russian writers, Ilya Ilf and Yevgeni Petrov, authors of the 1928 satire “The 12 Chairs,” and said, “ ‘It’s boring, ladies.’ We have seen this all before.”

But the diplomatic theater playing out in Moscow on a rainy Wednesday morning was far from boring: Mr. Putin, operating on home turf, was looking for any way to shape the narrative of Mr. Tillerson’s first trip here as secretary of state.

The outcome could well decide whether Mr. Trump’s oft-stated desire to remake American relations with Moscow will now disintegrate, just as similar efforts by Barack Obama did early in his presidency.

Russia said earlier this week that Mr. Putin would not meet with Mr. Tillerson, but on Wednesday the Russian leader’s spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, held out the possibility of a meeting later in the day. Russian leaders have greeted virtually all new secretaries of state since the end of World War II, but Mr. Peskov said any meeting would depend on how Mr. Tillerson’s other talks went.

The drama appeared to be an effort by Mr. Putin to show that he was in control.

Critics of the Trump administration insist that the series of events around the attack in Syria had been meant to distract from the investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

On Syria, Mr. Tillerson delivered what sounded much like an ultimatum to the Russians on Tuesday while talking to reporters at a Group of 7 meeting in Italy.

“I think it is clear to all of us that the reign of the Assad family is coming to an end,” Mr. Tillerson said, echoing a theme first heard from Mr. Obama in 2011, when the Arab Spring led many to believe the Syrian leader was about to be overthrown.

Mr. Tillerson essentially demanded that Russia make a choice, severing ties with Mr. Assad and working with the United States on a variety of initiatives in the Middle East.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/12/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
 
what a waste of efforts on Syria..who cares if it's barrel bombs or rebels,or Aassd?
The entire 6 year old Syrian Civil war is 1 continuing giant obscene war crime.

And US/Russian interests are held hostage to a bunch of crazies in Syria, while Cold War 2.0 mindlessly escalates with it's own unmitigated inertia.

at least there are low level talks -the 1 improvement in US/Russian relations from under Obama
 
They put on a Good show.....!!!
They manged to get thru a meeting where they disagree about everything in Syria.
By pressing Russia on Syria ( and again who cares?) the Trump adm. is deadlocking everything else
including REAL US interests in NATO/Russian relations.

The coupe de grace was yet another NATO expansion member today ( Montenegro) .

If Flynn were in, none of this would have happened,and you can be damn sure I fault Trump for listening to McMasters at the expense of Bannon
 
They manged to get thru a meeting where they disagree about everything in Syria.
By pressing Russia on Syria ( and again who cares?) the Trump adm. is deadlocking everything else
including REAL US interests in NATO/Russian relations.

The coupe de grace was yet another NATO expansion member today ( Montenegro) .

If Flynn were in, none of this would have happened,and you can be damn sure I fault Trump for listening to McMasters at the expense of Bannon

But Bannon is the devil lol.

I was hoping something positive would come of it. Probably the only good thing is the length of the meeting---it indicates a willingness to at least try and resolve their differences.
 
They manged to get thru a meeting where they disagree about everything in Syria.
By pressing Russia on Syria ( and again who cares?) the Trump adm. is deadlocking everything else
including REAL US interests in NATO/Russian relations.

The coupe de grace was yet another NATO expansion member today ( Montenegro) .

If Flynn were in, none of this would have happened,and you can be damn sure I fault Trump for listening to McMasters at the expense of Bannon

They put on a good show by pretending not to agree on shit.
 
The Ignorant and Arrogant Picking a Fight Their Sons Will Never Have to Fight

Our unelected Deep State tried to corrupt and strangle Russia when it was under Yeltsin's weak leadership. Since Putin took over, the PNAC globalists have tried to restart the Cold War. That's why DubDud hired a Russian expert as his national security advisor and occupied Afghanistan as an outpost on Russia's traditional border.
 
But how can Trump be his puppet?

The senate intelligence committee is figuring that out as we speak.

NewFearlessFish.gif
 
I know, right? What a pleasure to hear a coherent educated guy speak slowly, clearly, concisely and sum it all up under 5 minutes. LOL.
Not to mention a host to let him completely state his full thoughts. And, IMHO China isn't going to trade relations with the U.S. for N.K. With all the success China has with economics, technolgy and business, no way they're going to go all in with N.K.
 
Last edited:
China's Xi tells Trump he wants peaceful solution to North Korea

Chinese President Xi Jinping told President Trump in a phone call Wednesday that Beijing is willing to work with Washington on ending North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, but wants to do so through peaceful means.

"Had a very good call last night with the President of China concerning the menace of North Korea," Trump tweeted Wednesday morning.

Xi told Trump that China insists on peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula in the wake of the deployment of the USS Carl Vinson to the area and the conducting of the biggest-ever U.S.-South Korea military drills.

"China insists on realizing the denuclearization of the peninsula ... and is willing to maintain communication and coordination with the American side over the issue on the peninsula," Xi was quoted as saying by state media.


Story continues at................
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...p-wants-peaceful-solution-to-north-korea.html


**************************************************


China signaling North Korea to clean up — or else?

No one needs to look for tarot cards to figure out why Donald Trump ordered the USS Carl Vinson task group to sail for the Korean peninsula — he’s sending a message to North Korea. That message was already received in Pyongyang, but as Bloomberg reports today, it has been picked up by our allies too, with varying degrees of public enthusiasm. South Korea and Japan have played down the significance of the move and are sending signals of their own back to Washington to tread carefully:


South Korea doesn’t support a preemptive strike and is closely coordinating with the Trump administration, according to an Asian government official familiar with North Korean issues who asked not to be identified. Trump must take into consideration the countries affected for any military decision, the official said. …

Japan might only support a limited strike that targeted North Korea’s weapon facilities, according to a person with knowledge of the Abe administration’s thinking. In that scenario, the biggest risk Japan sees would be a North Korean attack on U.S. bases in the country, said the person, who asked not to be named while discussing matters of national security.

“This is psychological warfare,” said Narushige Michishita, a former Japanese defense ministry official and professor of strategic studies at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies. “When you want to scare your enemy, you have to make your own people believe that this is real. It is only natural that the U.S. is playing this game. While playing this game, the U.S. cannot tell us clearly that this is just bluffing.”


Story continues at.............
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/04/12/china-signaling-north-korea-to-clean-up-or-else/
 
China Warns North Korea Situation Has Hit "Tipping Point", Threatens "Never Before Seen" Measures

After warnings yesterday, and on the heels of a "very good call" with President Trump, China has escalated its threats to North Korea over its nuclear tests. In another Global Times op-ed, China warns "if the North makes another provocative move this month, the Chinese society will be willing to adopt severe restrictive measures that have never been seen before..."

Yesterday's editorial in the military-focused Global Times tabloid, owned and operated by the Communist Party's People's Daily newspaper, said that North Korea’s nuclear activities must not jeopardize northeastern China, and that if the North impacts China with its illicit nuclear tests through either "nuclear leakage or pollution", then China will respond with force.

“China has a bottom line that it will protect at all costs, that is, the security and stability of northeast China... If the bottom line is touched, China will employ all means available including the military means to strike back. By that time, it is not an issue of discussion whether China acquiesces in the US’ blows, but the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will launch attacks to DPRK nuclear facilities on its own."

Story continues at...........
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...-never-seen-measures-if-they-dont-de-escalate
 
I know, right? What a pleasure to hear a coherent educated guy speak slowly, clearly, concisely and sum it all up under 5 minutes. LOL.
Not to mention a host to let him completely state his full thoughts. And, IMHO China isn't going to trade relations with the U.S. for N.K. With all the success China has with economics, technology and business, no way they're going to go all in with N.K.
Welcome to Many Proxy Wars

In reaction to this betrayal, Putin will form strong alliances with North Korea, China, Iran, and Palestinian terrorists. In a sane world, Putin would have exterminated the Sunni armies while we would have done the same to the Shiites. Now Putin will send Russian youth to die for the Iranians and we will sacrifice our troops for Saudi Arabia. Allah is going "Hallelujah" at this catastropic turn of events.
 
China is suddenly leaning on North Korea — and it might be thanks to Trump

Something interesting is happening in China and perhaps President Trump deserves some credit.

For the first time, the Chinese government appears to have laid down a bottom-line with North Korea and is threatening Pyongyang with a response of “unprecedented ferocity” if the government of Kim Jong Un goes ahead with a test of either an intercontinental ballistic missile or a nuclear device. North Korea will celebrate the 105th anniversary of the birth of its founder, Kim Il Sung, on Saturday, and some type of military show of force is expected.

In an editorial in the semi-official Global Times on April 12, Pyongyang was put on notice that it must reign in its nuclear ambitions, or else China’s oil shipments to North Korea could be “severely limited.” It is extraordinary for China to make this kind of threat. For more than a decade, as part of its strategy to prop up one of its only allies, China refused to allow the U.N. Security Council to even consider cutting oil shipments to the north. Beijing’s calculus was that the maintenance of the North Korean regime took precedence over everything. Now Beijing seems to be reconsidering its position.

Story continues at.........
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ht-be-thanks-to-trump/?utm_term=.cac52909771f

****************************************

China sends back North Korean coal shipments, buys more from the US

China appears to be serious about its ban on North Korean coal, ordering Chinese trading companies to return millions of tonnes of coal back to its nuclear-obsessed neighbor.

In February, due to Pyongyang’s continued missile tests, China banned coal imports from North Korea for the rest of the year, cutting off a significant portion of the Hermit Kingdom’s foreign income. At the time, North Korea expert Stephan Haggard wrote that the ban could be “one of the most significant developments on the Korean peninsula” in over a decade — just as long as China was sincere about enforcing the sanctions.

China’s customs department signaled its sincerity on April 7th by issuing an order, telling trading companies to return their North Korean coal cargoes. Reuters reports that recently a fleet of North Korean cargo ships were loaded up with coal at Chinese ports before heading back home to the port of Nampo. One Chinese company said that it had 2 million tonnes of North Korean coal stranded at Chinese ports.

Of course, sanction or no, China still runs on coal. To make up the difference, China has started importing more coal from the United States, according to Reuters. A move that likely won’t please the Kim Jong-un regime. Already, North Korean state media has accused China of “dancing to the US tune.”

However, it is a happy development for US President and coal lover Donald Trump who tweeted yesterday that he had told Chinese President Xi Jinping that all China has to do to get a better trade deal with the US is to “solve the North Korean problem.”

http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com...-korean-coal-shipments-buys-more-from-the-us/
 
Back
Top