Obamacare choices may go from 1 to 0 in some places

Lets see how much power Rump has over Obamacare, if he has his way the choices will go to 0 all over the nation. He is trying to strangle Obamacare.
 
evince said:
a human being and a car are two different things


can you tell me their major difference idiot?
Click to expand...

Didn't say they were the same thing. However, if you CHOOSE to not do (fill in the blank), CHOOSING to not do (fill in the blank #2) also involves a CHOICE. While the body shop shouldn't fix the car is the person has no insurance or can't pay, the same applies if the person not having health coverage doesn't due to choosing not to have it.
 
Jarod said:
Lets see how much power Rump has over Obamacare, if he has his way the choices will go to 0 all over the nation. He is trying to strangle Obamacare.
Click to expand...


Regardless of how many choices exist within a State, you always have a choice whether or not to provide something to someone you think should have it with your own money. Prove you care by providing it yourself for those that don't have it.
 
Althea said:
What they all 'want', is to get rid of the ACA related taxation. Anything else isn't even a consideration. Why else would they put forth such an idiotic plan for healthcare? I have to wonder if they'd accept those terms for themselves? Given that women/seniors will pay 'bigly' for insurance.
Click to expand...

Are you saying it's idiotic to expect people to provide their own healthcare with their own money? If someone doesn't have healthcare and claims they can't afford it, there is another opportunity for you to prove you care for them as much as you claim in words.
 
Teflon Don said:
Actually there is.

But you can prove me wrong. Try and buy a policy in a different state. See what happens
Click to expand...
No, there isn't a Fed law that prohibits it. But you can prove me wrong. If you can't buy a policy across state lines, that's because the company doesn't want to do business in that state. Maybe they don't want to comply with another state's regulations?

But there's nothing the Feds can do with respect to opening cross state markets that cannot be done right now.
 
Darth Omar said:
It's immoral to deny emergency treatment to a trauma victims because they don't have insurance. They do that in barbaric countries.
Click to expand...

lets say you are a doctor.

You are a free individual.

Being forced to operate on someone, is being compelled to work against your will. Being forced to work on the uninsured, without pay (or mitigated pay via the government) is slavery. You are being forced to work on a trash individual that couldn't anticipate the future.

It is far more immoral to not plan for events in your life and expect others to pick up the burden. It is immoral to be taker scum. They should be left to die.
 
Rune said:
So Reagan was wrong to force hospitals to treat everyone?
Click to expand...

yeahhe was wrong. Lets stop this dumbass snark on JPP where people like you assume that because a conservative politician did something it means all conservatives must agree with all policies and statements the politician ever put forth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top