How do the JPP Russia-phobes spin this?

Queen Snowflake said:
https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox....17/2/17/14649980/trump-clinton-russia-uranium
Click to expand...


Ooooooooo I'm scared...VOX says this????? Caters to millennial snowflake gamers.

From Bloomberg:

Company Overview

Vox Media, Inc., a media company, creates and distributes online content, and connects with educated young adults worldwide. It offers SB Nation, an online sports media brand and network of individual fan-centric sports communities; The Verge, a technology publication; Polygon, a publication for adult gamers; Vox.com, an interest news site; Eater, food and dining publication; Racked, a shopping, beauty, and fashion publication; Curbed, a real estate and home brand publication; and Re/code, a tech business publication. Vox Media, Inc. was formerly known as SBNation, Inc. and changed its name to Vox Media, Inc. November 2011. The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Washington, District Of Columbia with additional offices in New York, New York; Chicago, Illinois; and San Francisco, California.

From CNN Money:

In August 2015, NBCUniversal made a $200 million equity investment in Vox Media Inc., valuing the company at more than $1 billion.
 
coolbreeze said:
spin it anyway you want, but to try and explain away the fact that the Clinton foundation got millions of dollars in "donation" from Uranium One, the company that orchestrated the Uranium deal with Russia, after Clinton was involved with the approval process, and shortly after the deal Bill Clinton made $500,000.oo to speak in front of a Russian investment bank that was promoting Uranium One stock is nothing more than typical liberal denial.

And those are Facts, FACTS, and even Snopes can't dispute facts. So be your own thinker instead of letting someone else do it for you, it's refreshing.
Click to expand...

There's really no putting lipstick on the pig.

Russia and the Clintons colluded together on a Uranium deal and both parties got what they wanted. But this was back before the breakout of the McCarthy-like, totally partisan driven, anti-Russian paranoia that is endemic on the left and cultivated by such neocon dinosaurs as John McCain and Dick Cheney.

Even two years ago, who could have imagined Donald Trump would have made ideological bedfellows out of the left and the neocons?

But here we are.
 
Darth Omar said:
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...ferer=http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index
__________________

This is relevant because dealings with Russia are relevant.

Consider the absurdity of this: democrats are up in arms at the evidence-less prospect of Trump colluding with the Russians to win an election. Unless something turns it up, it's little more than a conspiracy theory or something out of two-bit spy novel.

But we know, and they know, it is a *fact* that the Clintons were involved in a deal with the Russians that allowed Putin to control one fifth of the worlds Uranium supply. After the deal was struck, the Russian controlled Uranium One contributed 2.5 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

That is some serious Russian collusion. And since it doesn't involve Trump it's like it doesn't matter.

Could you imagine if it did?
Click to expand...

Wrong LIAR.
Hillary had to sign, as only Obama could veto.
Bill had nothing to do with it.

Nothing you ever post works without your lies.
You are only hurting yourself.

The People are sick of lying idiots like yourself.
 
Rune said:
Wrong LIAR.
Hillary had to sign, as only Obama could veto.
Bill had nothing to do with it.

Nothing you ever post works without your lies.
You are only hurting yourself.

The People are sick of lying idiots like yourself.
Click to expand...

We can see the pig but what color lipstick is that lol?

Who cares who signed what? If Obama could have vetoed it but didn't, what exactly does that do for your case? That just makes him a treasonous co-conspirator.
 
Darth Omar said:
There's really no putting lipstick on the pig.

Russia and the Clintons colluded together on a Uranium deal and both parties got what they wanted. But this was back before the breakout of the McCarthy-like, totally partisan driven, anti-Russian paranoia that is endemic on the left and cultivated by such neocon dinosaurs as John McCain and Dick Cheney.

Even two years ago, who could have imagined Donald Trump would have made ideological bedfellows out of the left and the neocons?

But here we are.
Click to expand...

Did you have a loving attitude toward Russia during the Cold War, or just since Douchebag Donald was a candidate?
 
Bigdog said:
What financial stake does President Trump have in Russia???
Click to expand...
We'll find out when one or more of the following occurs:

trump releases his tax returns with all schedules

The investigation ends, and we have all of the info re. trump's/his staff's ties to Russian banks, corporations, etc.

Right now, the odds are better than not that trump owes millions to foreign banks. He has slummy hotels in many countries....or at least he rented his name to same.


When trump stops obstructing the investigations, we won't have to speculate
 
Darth Omar said:
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/...ferer=http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index
__________________

This is relevant because dealings with Russia are relevant.

Consider the absurdity of this: democrats are up in arms at the evidence-less prospect of Trump colluding with the Russians to win an election. Unless something turns it up, it's little more than a conspiracy theory or something out of two-bit spy novel.

But we know, and they know, it is a *fact* that the Clintons were involved in a deal with the Russians that allowed Putin to control one fifth of the worlds Uranium supply. After the deal was struck, the Russian controlled Uranium One contributed 2.5 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

That is some serious Russian collusion. And since it doesn't involve Trump it's like it doesn't matter.

Could you imagine if it did?
Click to expand...

FAKE NEWS
 
Micawber said:
Why did you leave out the part about it being a Canadian mining company? That was a big omit. You mentioned Canadian records, but it was Canadian records because it was a Canadian company sold off to the Russian concern over several years.
Click to expand...

Yet it is still 20% of our uranium production. Why do you ignore that? Liberals approved of that, and you don't consider that a concern?
 
Chlorate said:
Right, because the other Soviet Republics had a say in anything that went on...
Click to expand...

The Soviets were a different animal than Russia under Putin.

We had an actual reason to fear the former. You confuse my lack of Russia-phobia with something else.

Why are you a Russia-phobe? Are you a lemming?
 
Darth Omar said:
The Soviets were a different animal than Russia under Putin.

We had an actual reason to fear the former. You confuse my lack of Russia-phobia with something else.

Why are you a Russia-phobe? Are you a lemming?
Click to expand...

What was there to fear from Soviet Russia?
 
Darth Omar said:
You really are a Russia phobe then. Congrats.

Why didn't you fear them before Trump came along?
Click to expand...

You know, during the Cold War, JFK invited nuclear war by blockading Cuba - an act of war. This tells me that the Soviets were just as hesitant to use nukes as the Putin regime likely is.

The reason why I fear Russia is because I'm a lifelong Republican, and an antipopulist, traditional conservative. I'm guessing you are a Republican convert who has also come to embrace populism. This means you come from a pro-Russian background.
 
Chlorate said:
You know, during the Cold War, JFK invited nuclear war by blockading Cuba - an act of war. This tells me that the Soviets were just as hesitant to use nukes as the Putin regime likely is.

The reason why I fear Russia is because I'm a lifelong Republican, and an antipopulist, traditional conservative. I'm guessing you are a Republican convert who has also come to embrace populism. This means you come from a pro-Russian background.
Click to expand...

JFK was involved in a chess match that involved nightmarish stakes. Yes, the Soviets were hesitant to use their nukes but tensions between the two countries were amped-up to the point the prospect of nuclear war was quite real.

I prefer not to make that mistake with Putin. Especially, not over some half-baked theory about 'Russians stealing an election'. Or that *he might* do this or that thing in the Baltics or whatever.

We have plenty on our plate with NK---who have actually threatened to nuke us. The Iranians are threatening to start WWIII in the Middle East. Radical Islam.

Russia? Give me a break. The last thing we need is to go looking for enemies when we already have as many as we can handle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top