Trump team communications captured by intelligence community surveillance, Nunes says

none of the reports he had read mentioned Russia or Russians and he was unsure whether the surveillance occurred at Trump Tower -- as President Trump has suggested.
Click to expand...
it's not the FBI counter-intelligence investigation.

we do know there was a lot of illegal leaking (unmasking) "widely disseminated" across the INTEL agencies
 
Jarod said:
Ok, so? I bet Rump is worried about what they found... Maybe its why Rump is now under FBI investigation.
Click to expand...
you should STFU . you are completely speculating without any basis of fact.
You don't know -and everything I've read to the contrary- that Trump is being investigated by what Comey testified.
This might not even been an FBI investigation.
 
anatta said:
you should STFU . you are completely speculating without any basis of fact.
You don't know -and everything I've read to the contrary- that Trump is being investigated by what Comey testified.
This might not even been an FBI investigation.
Click to expand...

Thats why I said "I bet..." and "Maybe".
 
Jarod said:
Thats why I said "I bet..." and "Maybe".
Click to expand...
this is all new from what I can digest...really no need for wild speculation.

I gave you what I can glean about it on post 2. Clearly the IC is leaking like a sieve.
++
N.S.A. Gets More Latitude to Share Intercepted Communications
Intelligence agencies other than the NSA will have to provide justification for why they need access to that data. It can only be for foreign intelligence, or other enumerated purposes.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.

The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.......
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...to-share-intercepted-communications.html?_r=0
 
anatta said:
this is all new from what I can digest...really no need for wild speculation.

I gave you what I can glean about it on post 2. Clearly the IC is leaking like a sieve.
++
N.S.A. Gets More Latitude to Share Intercepted Communications
Intelligence agencies other than the NSA will have to provide justification for why they need access to that data. It can only be for foreign intelligence, or other enumerated purposes.

The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch signed the new rules, permitting the N.S.A. to disseminate “raw signals intelligence information,” on Jan. 3, after the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., signed them on Dec. 15, according to a 23-page, largely declassified copy of the procedures.

The N.S.A.’s analysts passed on only information they deemed pertinent, screening out the identities of innocent people and irrelevant personal information.

Now, other intelligence agencies will be able to search directly through raw repositories of communications intercepted by the N.S.A. and then apply such rules for “minimizing” privacy intrusions.......
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/...to-share-intercepted-communications.html?_r=0
Click to expand...

Yup, I bet Rump is huddled with Lawyers as we speak trying to figure out what they know and what they heard.
 
Thing1 said:
Yeah - lies piss me off. What can I say? When the current President accuses his predecessor of a felony, I don't laugh it off.

Go figure.
Click to expand...

They do me too, but I wait for the facts to come in.

The accusation may have some merit. This thing isn't over yet.
 
anatta said:
Members of the intelligence community "incidentally collected" communications from the Trump transition team during legal surveillance operations of foreign targets, a top Republican lawmaker said Wednesday afternoon.

House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said this produced "dozens" of reports which eventually unmasked several individuals’ identities and were "widely disseminated."

He said none of the reports he had read mentioned Russia or Russians and he was unsure whether the surveillance occurred at Trump Tower -- as President Trump has suggested. Nunes also was unsure if then President-elect Trump was captured by the surveillance, which occurred in November, December and January.

“I recently confirmed on numerous occasions the intelligence community incidentally collected intelligence,” Nunes said.

The revelations could at least partially back up some allegations made by Trump earlier this month, in which he tweeted that former President Barack Obama had "wiretapped" him, though top lawmakers have sharply disputed those claims.

Nunes said he told House Speaker Paul Ryan earlier Wednesday and was set to tell Trump and the White House later in the afternoon.

"There’s a lot of questions that I think his statement raises, and that I hope we can get to the bottom of,” White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said.

He said the NSA had been "very helpful" during the investigation, however, he was unsure if "the FBI is going to comply."

Nunes said the surveillance collection was "legally collected foreign intelligence under FISA incidental collection." But Nunes said he was "alarmed" the intelligence "ended up in reporting channels and was widely disseminated."

It was previously reported that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was "unmasked" in this way, however, Nunes said "additional names" were unmasked as well.

He said he didn't know what foreign intelligence value the surveillance had "and why people would need to know that about President-elect Trump and his transition team." Nunes did not identify which foreign targets were under surveillance.

Asked if he thought Trump was spied on, Nunes replied: "I'm not gonna get into legal definitions here, but clearly I have a concern."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...igence-community-surveillance-nunes-says.html
Click to expand...

What drugs do you take to dream this stuff up..................or do you listen to CNN like a retard would?
 
Thing1 said:
I posted about this earlier today.

The talking points for a week+ now have been about the surveillance - not about Trump's accusation on Obama. They've set it up so that if there was ANY surveillance whatsoever, Trump was "right."

This is life in post-truth America. We need to get used to it.
Click to expand...

We lived in a post-truth America for the last eight years of the Obama Administration.....it never seemed to bother you lying leftist hypocrites then. Dunce.
 
Thing1 said:
I posted about this earlier today.

The talking points for a week+ now have been about the surveillance - not about Trump's accusation on Obama. They've set it up so that if there was ANY surveillance whatsoever, Trump was "right."

This is life in post-truth America. We need to get used to it.
Click to expand...

They just don't understand that Obama is not and was never responsible for anything that happened in the last 8 years......damn cons just don't get it.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top