Isn't this treason?

M

Motti

Verified User
Judge Nap: Obama 'Went Outside Chain of Command,' Used British Spy Agency to Surveil Trump

"Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command," Napolitano said. "He didn't use the NSA, he didn't use the CIA, he didn't use the FBI, and he didn't use the Department of Justice."

Instead, Napolitano said, Obama used GCHQ, a British intelligence and security organization that has 24-7 access to the NSA database.
 
Silly.

"A UK spy agency did not eavesdrop on Donald Trump during and after last year's U.S. presidential election, a British security official said on Tuesday, denying an allegation by a U.S. television analyst.

The official, who is familiar with British government policy and security operations, told Reuters that the charge made on Tuesday by Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, was "totally untrue and quite frankly absurd."

GCHQ has a close relationship with the NSA, as well as with the eavesdropping agencies of Australia, Canada and New Zealand in a consortium called "Five Eyes."The British official said that under British law, GCHQ "can only gather intelligence for national security purposes" and noted that the U.S. election "clearly doesn't meet that criteria."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wiretapping-idUSKBN16L2UV
 
christiefan915 said:
Silly.

"A UK spy agency did not eavesdrop on Donald Trump during and after last year's U.S. presidential election, a British security official said on Tuesday, denying an allegation by a U.S. television analyst.

The official, who is familiar with British government policy and security operations, told Reuters that the charge made on Tuesday by Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, was "totally untrue and quite frankly absurd."

GCHQ has a close relationship with the NSA, as well as with the eavesdropping agencies of Australia, Canada and New Zealand in a consortium called "Five Eyes."The British official said that under British law, GCHQ "can only gather intelligence for national security purposes" and noted that the U.S. election "clearly doesn't meet that criteria."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wiretapping-idUSKBN16L2UV
Click to expand...

What's the denial worth? Not like they'd admit it lol.
 
christiefan915 said:
Silly.

"A UK spy agency did not eavesdrop on Donald Trump during and after last year's U.S. presidential election, a British security official said on Tuesday, denying an allegation by a U.S. television analyst.

The official, who is familiar with British government policy and security operations, told Reuters that the charge made on Tuesday by Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, was "totally untrue and quite frankly absurd."

GCHQ has a close relationship with the NSA, as well as with the eavesdropping agencies of Australia, Canada and New Zealand in a consortium called "Five Eyes."The British official said that under British law, GCHQ "can only gather intelligence for national security purposes" and noted that the U.S. election "clearly doesn't meet that criteria."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wiretapping-idUSKBN16L2UV
Click to expand...

the definition of "national security purposes" is so elastic as to be meaningless -it could have been searching NSA data for information elsewhere,and "spillover" to another.
One thing is clear. Spooksville operates on it's on interpretation of laws.
 
it would be treason if lawful order was in the land. until the swamp is drained and the vermin are... prosecuted... the one world bank / order is ... ignored ... and ... p r o s e c u t e d. . . can you say only The Lord Jesus Christ do that? I knew you could.
 
Lets have all da gubment snoops looking for wire taps, not those that have met & did who knows what effecting the election & the current regime in power..
raw
 
Bill said:
Lets have all da gubment snoops looking for wire taps, not those that have met & did who knows what effecting the election & the current regime in power..
raw
Click to expand...
Why aren't people bitching about all the money going down the tube in these fake accusations of Trump, first it was election fraud and now the wiretapping. Will we investigate all of Trump's fantasies?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top