Assange on Clinton! Bombshell!

tsuke

New member
Julian Assange: Clinton stated privately this month that she is quietly pushing for a Pence takeover. She stated that Pence is predictable hence defeatable

via twitter!!
 
Woo.

Big news.

A Democrat politician is working behind the scenes to get an unstable fucking right-wing lunatic out of the WH.

Woo.

I bet some Republicans are working with her on that.
 
I thought hrc was pushing for this so called takeover.
Regardless, looks like she's still running for president.:gives:

basically hillary and the democrats wants pence to take over as he is easier to beat in the coming elections than trump.
 
Julian Assange: Clinton stated privately this month that she is quietly pushing for a Pence takeover. She stated that Pence is predictable hence defeatable

via twitter!!

"WikiLeaks founder and editor-in-chief Julian Assange said on Tuesday, without offering any proof, that Hillary Clinton and intelligence officials "close to" Vice President Mike Pence are working to undermine Donald Trump's presidency in an effort to replace him with his vice president."

8344ab66c2ad3e60894be4bd5d25c3c8.jpg
 
"WikiLeaks founder and editor-in-chief Julian Assange said on Tuesday, without offering any proof, that Hillary Clinton and intelligence officials "close to" Vice President Mike Pence are working to undermine Donald Trump's presidency in an effort to replace him with his vice president."

8344ab66c2ad3e60894be4bd5d25c3c8.jpg

Why this sudden obsession with proof?

There isn't any for the Trump/Russian collusion theory and they've been harping on it since November. I fail to see how this is different, except for the fact Trump isn't implicated and Obama is.
 
Why this sudden obsession with proof?

There isn't any for the Trump/Russian collusion theory and they've been harping on it since November. I fail to see how this is different, except for the fact Trump isn't implicated and Obama is.
somebody is doing the collusion and the leakage,and it aint Trump
 
Why this sudden obsession with proof?

There isn't any for the Trump/Russian collusion theory and they've been harping on it since November. I fail to see how this is different, except for the fact Trump isn't implicated and Obama is.

Well, I can admit that offering proof doesn't always sway people who are married to their opinions. Case in point, Obama's birth certificate.

I also don't think anyone should throw out unsubstantiated claims into cyberspace where they take on a life of their own. If an investigation concludes the trump-Russia connection is just a figment, I'll have to accept it. The same if an investigation proves that Obama tapped trump's phone, or whatever he says was tapped... his microwave, lol?

However, if the trump-Russia thing is proven true and the Obama phone tap is proven false, will cons accept it? I doubt it.
 
Well, I can admit that offering proof doesn't always sway people who are married to their opinions. Case in point, Obama's birth certificate.

I also don't think anyone should throw out unsubstantiated claims into cyberspace where they take on a life of their own. If an investigation concludes the trump-Russia connection is just a figment, I'll have to accept it. The same if an investigation proves that Obama tapped trump's phone, or whatever he says was tapped... his microwave, lol?

However, if the trump-Russia thing is proven true and the Obama phone tap is proven false, will cons accept it? I doubt it.

Obamas brother released his kenyan birth certificate didnt he? :3
 
Back
Top