95% of Apple shareholders say NO to quota hiring of non-whites

You've made that claim yet provide no names of those six. Like you said, anyone can say anything on the internet. Where's your proof?

There is absolutely no reason the person that killed her should have been allowed to stay based purely on his illegal status. That's what you don't get. Until the person committed those multiple felonies, they were of a sub-group of illegals for which you, by your own words, aren't he focus of those that need to be addressed.

I've seen plenty of death. I've seen INNOCENT people die because some ILLEGAL piece of shit chose to drive drunk and ran into that innocent person. Despite you not caring, the piece of shit ILLEGAL had no criminal record when he made a choice that took a life.

You should feel right at home living where you live. Keep looking out for those that you choose to ignore and maybe the criminal record that causes them to become the focus will involve something they did to you or someone you care about. I doubt that would change your attitude.

You want to list my friends name on here? You going to reach out to them or something?

Remind me again how my actions determine our country's policy on this issue.
 
You want to list my friends name on here? You going to reach out to them or something?

Remind me again how my actions determine our country's policy on this issue.

It's called proof. Remember what you said about people saying anything on the internet. I see you apply the do as I say not as I do concept.

Remind me again of your address so I can provide the proof you say I need to back up a claim I made. That's right, you want proof from me of something for which I direct experience or you say it's false yet you make a claim without proof to back it up then expect me to believe you because you said so. Hypocrite.
 
It's called proof. Remember what you said about people saying anything on the internet. I see you apply the do as I say not as I do concept.

Remind me again of your address so I can provide the proof you say I need to back up a claim I made. That's right, you want proof from me of something for which I direct experience or you say it's false yet you make a claim without proof to back it up then expect me to believe you because you said so. Hypocrite.

I asked you what sport you played. You are acting like I asked you for the nuclear codes to our country.
 
It's not a difficult concept dude. Focus on the most dangerous first.

So you would rather be reactive than proactive? Interesting.

Do you realize that the ones you call the "most dangerous" weren't considered that way until they did something to cause it? That's the fault in the concept you propose.

Do you check the oil in your car on a regular basis or wait until it gets so low it causes problems before doing something about it?
 
Back
Top