95% of Apple shareholders say NO to quota hiring of non-whites

I made the argument that you are a traitor. I used your words to defend it. Not my fault you choose to be one. Not my fault that your mother raised one. Is my place to point out that you are one. Now you understand the difference. Or maybe you still don't and never will.

We can only hope you're the next victim of one of the illegal for which you care so much.
Thanks Desh. Yes, I said we should we focus on throwing out people here illegally with criminal records like the person who killed Kate Steinly and in your mind that means I'm a traitor and deserve to be killed. Makes perfect sense.

You can't use your worlds to describe why people come and how to address it because you don't have the capacity to do so.
 
Thanks Desh. Yes, I said we should we focus on throwing out people here illegally with criminal records like the person who killed Kate Steinly and in your mind that means I'm a traitor and deserve to be killed. Makes perfect sense.

You can't use your worlds to describe why people come and how to address it because you don't have the capacity to do so.

EVERY illegal here is a criminal. You act as if because they haven't committed certain crimes they're any different than those that have. You try to justify a difference that doesn't exist and support changing the laws to allow those that would come here illegally to no longer be considered illegal. Your words. That's what makes you a traitor.

I've addressed why they come here in post #93. I've addressed how to deal with it. You automatically, without hesitation, said we can't do that. I support sending the ILLEGAL pieces of shit back, posting armed guards at the border, and treating them like a criminal breaking into my house would be treated. Unlike you, I don't make excuses claiming that someone overstaying a visa is less illegal than someone that simply came in without permission. If they're breaking a law that says they can't be here, they're illegal either way. Idiots like you are the ones that support punishing a citizen that let his/her drivers license expire to a greater extent that someone that shouldn't be here because he/she has an expired visa. I bet you're willing to claim that the expired visa crowd just forgot.
 
EVERY illegal here is a criminal. You act as if because they haven't committed certain crimes they're any different than those that have. You try to justify a difference that doesn't exist and support changing the laws to allow those that would come here illegally to no longer be considered illegal. Your words. That's what makes you a traitor.

I've addressed why they come here in post #93. I've addressed how to deal with it. You automatically, without hesitation, said we can't do that. I support sending the ILLEGAL pieces of shit back, posting armed guards at the border, and treating them like a criminal breaking into my house would be treated. Unlike you, I don't make excuses claiming that someone overstaying a visa is less illegal than someone that simply came in without permission. If they're breaking a law that says they can't be here, they're illegal either way. Idiots like you are the ones that support punishing a citizen that let his/her drivers license expire to a greater extent that someone that shouldn't be here because he/she has an expired visa. I bet you're willing to claim that the expired visa crowd just forgot.

Maybe this is a surprise to you but I'm not running the country and making these decisions. Your anger should be directed at Trump and Republicans in Congress for not implementing your plan.
 
Yes they are criminals and their crime is monstrous. They invade a foreign country to steal jobs and tax dollars from the citizens!!! And yet the media cartels refuse to call them criminals or even illegals.

Cawacko doens't think so. He thinks only those that have committed crimes should be deported. That, alone, tells me he doesn't believe someone coming here without permission or overstaying a visa is a crime.
 
Cawacko doens't think so. He thinks only those that have committed crimes should be deported. That, alone, tells me he doesn't believe someone coming here without permission or overstaying a visa is a crime.

For someone who claims to have gone to college on an academic scholarship you'd think reading comprehension would be more intertwined in your DNA. I said our focus should be on those here with criminal records. Notice the term FOCUS.
 
I've never made either claim.

Oracle pays its Indian workers less .. that's a well-known fact among those in the industry.

Oracle sued for unlawful firing over lower Indian pay
Former employee sues the U.S. software vendor for allegedly firing him after he objected to instructions to lower a salary offer to an Indian worker.

Lawsuit: Oracle called $50K 'good money for an Indian'
http://www.itworld.com/article/2831...e-called--50k--good-money-for-an-indian-.html

I had a higher salary then my Indian supervisor.

BAC has always confused the term "well known" for "well speculated"
 
For someone who claims to have gone to college on an academic scholarship you'd think reading comprehension would be more intertwined in your DNA. I said our focus should be on those here with criminal records. Notice the term FOCUS.

But what you mean is "ignore all illegals without criminal records". OTOH the law says anyone caught here illegally must be deported. THINK, america-hater.
 
For someone who claims to have gone to college on an academic scholarship you'd think reading comprehension would be more intertwined in your DNA. I said our focus should be on those here with criminal records. Notice the term FOCUS.

It is. That's why I'm trying to educate a person of average intelligence like you.

If you're here illegally, you're a criminal. Your focus is on those with a record. Mine is on those that have committed a criminal act. That's EVERY illegal. Something you fail to understand is that until those with criminal RECORDS had that criminal record, they were of a type of illegal you want to ignore.

Should we wait until they have a record, possibly doing these types of things:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...mmigrant-charged-killing-woman-DUI-crash.html
http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/dui-ille.../examples-of-serious-crimes-by-illegal-aliens

Or should we address that EVERY illegal here has committed a crime.

Since you only want to focus on the ones with a record, ignoring that every one of them is a criminal simply by being here without permission, maybe what they do to get that record you desire before FOCUSING on them will directly affect you or someone you love.
 
Citation needed.

Cawacko's own words of "I said our focus should be on those here with criminal records". If the focus is on those with criminal records, it ignores those that are just illegal but have no record. What you also don't seem to understand is that those with records at some point in time were one of those illegals without one that some people want to ignore.
 
It is. That's why I'm trying to educate a person of average intelligence like you.

If you're here illegally, you're a criminal. Your focus is on those with a record. Mine is on those that have committed a criminal act. That's EVERY illegal. Something you fail to understand is that until those with criminal RECORDS had that criminal record, they were of a type of illegal you want to ignore.

Should we wait until they have a record, possibly doing these types of things:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...mmigrant-charged-killing-woman-DUI-crash.html
http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/dui-ille.../examples-of-serious-crimes-by-illegal-aliens

Or should we address that EVERY illegal here has committed a crime.

Since you only want to focus on the ones with a record, ignoring that every one of them is a criminal simply by being here without permission, maybe what they do to get that record you desire before FOCUSING on them will directly affect you or someone you love.

Ok, remind me again how I'm determining who our gov't is deporting from this country.
 
Cawacko's own words of "I said our focus should be on those here with criminal records". If the focus is on those with criminal records, it ignores those that are just illegal but have no record. What you also don't seem to understand is that those with records at some point in time were one of those illegals without one that some people want to ignore.

So, you just have your opinion, and no hard evidence?
 
I've already mentioned I have six friends who were close with Kate Steinly. There is absolutely no reason the person who killed her should have been in our country with his multiple felonies and arrests.

There is an Irish guy in my office who is not a citizen. I think he was here on a visa that may be expiring as I heard the office talking about trying to get him the ability to stay on an H1-B. CFM and TDAK believe the Irish guy in my office to be as big as a threat as the guy with multiple felonies who killed Kate Steinly.

So I have seen death through this experience. What about you?
 
CFM and TDAK believe the Irish guy in my office to be as big as a threat as the guy with multiple felonies who killed Kate Steinly.

HAHAHA. What a liar you are. Show where i said that.

What i said is everyone caught here illegally should be deported both because that's the ethical thing to do and because the law demands it. But of course some illegals are a bigger threat than others. THINK
 
I've already mentioned I have six friends who were close with Kate Steinly. There is absolutely no reason the person who killed her should have been in our country with his multiple felonies and arrests.

There is an Irish guy in my office who is not a citizen. I think he was here on a visa that may be expiring as I heard the office talking about trying to get him the ability to stay on an H1-B. CFM and TDAK believe the Irish guy in my office to be as big as a threat as the guy with multiple felonies who killed Kate Steinly.

So I have seen death through this experience. What about you?

You've made that claim yet provide no names of those six. Like you said, anyone can say anything on the internet. Where's your proof?

There is absolutely no reason the person that killed her should have been allowed to stay based purely on his illegal status. That's what you don't get. Until the person committed those multiple felonies, they were of a sub-group of illegals for which you, by your own words, aren't he focus of those that need to be addressed.

I've seen plenty of death. I've seen INNOCENT people die because some ILLEGAL piece of shit chose to drive drunk and ran into that innocent person. Despite you not caring, the piece of shit ILLEGAL had no criminal record when he made a choice that took a life.

You should feel right at home living where you live. Keep looking out for those that you choose to ignore and maybe the criminal record that causes them to become the focus will involve something they did to you or someone you care about. I doubt that would change your attitude.
 
Back
Top