When was the last time SF, NY or LA went Republican?
So you claim Republicans have always been takers stealing from these centers of wealth creation?
When was the last time SF, NY or LA went Republican?
So you claim Republicans have always been takers stealing from these centers of wealth creation?
I would argue that was the past paradigm. I would argue that there has been a significant change in both parties coalitions. Both parties appear now to be oligarchical in nature and the current coalitions of bot parties look like this;
Republican- business elites allied with the white working class.
Democrats- professional elites allied with diversity.
Can I get a translation on this?
Is it a badge of honor that the democrats trust fund babies lose?
That alert ^ should accompany every one of your posts.
Since when are illegal immigrants considered paired with professionals? The democrats are lawless...period.
I would argue that was the past paradigm. I would argue that there has been a significant change in both parties coalitions. Both parties appear now to be oligarchical in nature and the current coalitions of bot parties look like this;
Republican- business elites allied with the white working class.
Democrats- professional elites allied with diversity.
#1.
Dems are supported by elites and respond only to the interests of their elite support base. Ashley Judd, Meryl Street, George Soros, ect. The democrat party's action have had a detrimental effect on farmers, the self employed, low income short of poverty workers.
A. The elites include the elite protected classes; teachers unions, public sector unions, any company large and rich enough to buy an obama care exemption.
Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton, nor Barack Obama, were born to wealthy families or had trust funds.
You seemed to be implying that these centers of wealth creation have not voted Republican for some time. I assumed you were suggesting that the GOP has long catered to the "unwashed slobs" and takers.
^The OP is spot on. Here's the poster child of "Full Tard"
lol
So you claim Republicans have always been takers stealing from these centers of wealth creation?

You mean nominated a candidate who wasn't a trust fund baby? John McCain come from a famous Naval family it is hardly a trust fund baby. Bob Dole certainly wasn't a trust fund baby nor was Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford or Richard Nixon or Dwight Eisenhower or Thomas Dewey or Wendell Wilkie or Alf Landon or Hoover or Cooledge or Harding or Hugh's.When was the last time the Republicans elected a president who was not a trust fund baby.
You seemed to be implying that these centers of wealth creation have not voted Republican for some time. I assumed you were suggesting that the GOP has long catered to the "unwashed slobs" and takers.
Neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton, nor Barack Obama, were born to wealthy families or had trust funds.
You mean nominated a candidate who wasn't a trust fund baby? John McCain come from a famous Naval family it is hardly a trust fund baby. Bob Dole certainly wasn't a trust fund baby nor was Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford or Richard Nixon or Dwight Eisenhower or Thomas Dewey or Wendell Wilkie or Alf Landon or Hoover or Cooledge or Harding or Hugh's.
You have to go back all the way to William Howard Taft for another Republican nominee for President who was a Trust fund baby. So in the last 100 years only Bush I, Bush II and Romney were the only trust fund babies.
You forgot to pay lip service to the tard angle. I'll accept the modification, but there must be some major crazy going on in the white working class to explain acceptance of Trump, or Palin, or whatever antiintellectual jingoistic stick figure you'd like to insert.
Moronic nonsense.