Sessions not alone: Russian ambassador also met with numerous Democrats
- Thread starter Cancel 2018.2
- Start date
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Franken's question:
"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"
"What will you do"
Then Sessions VOLUNTEERED information Franken never asked for:
"I did not have communications with the Russians."
Except HE DID HAVE CONTACT with the Russians.
IOW...he LIED under oath.
Sadly, deplorable Trumpkins refuse to acknowledge the truth even when it's spelled out for them.
"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"
"What will you do"
Then Sessions VOLUNTEERED information Franken never asked for:
"I did not have communications with the Russians."
Except HE DID HAVE CONTACT with the Russians.
IOW...he LIED under oath.
Sadly, deplorable Trumpkins refuse to acknowledge the truth even when it's spelled out for them.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Provide proof it was in the course of the campaign.
Prove it.
Prove it.
Last edited:
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Doesn't matter.
Sessions stated quite clearly he had had NO COMMUNICATIONS with Russia.
EXCEPT HE HAD communicated with Russia..
IOW...HE LIED.
You can play all the partisan word games you like, but the proof he lied is right there is Session's own words.
Then CHARGE him perjury.....
but you know that ain't gonna happen don't you....
and you know why, fool ?.....because its total bullshit....lmao!
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
How can you say it doesn't matter when that is exactly what Franken asked him? You can't just take out his words and pretend they don't exist. That is not honest.
Have ever inhaled marijuana vs. Have you ever inhaled marijauna while on the job.
You of course would say that it doesn't matter about the job and you would of course be wrong.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
It won't happen because Congressional Trumpkins, who boasted how different things would be under Trump (ANOTHER LIE), won't allow it.
Did the Democrats deny it??
Were the Democrats involved in a national presidential campaign that has been accused of colluding with the Russians?
Are you so dumb you fall for Fox's effort to cloud up the facts here?
Regardless of who said he lied under oath, look at the transcript.. he did.
Jeff Sessions for one.
Depends on what they discussed, who they met with, and why they lied about it.
It was clearly not limited to the course of the campaign...
Why do you think Sessions is going back to tomorrow to readdress the questions/
You are so easily duped.
I wish they would, but they wont because he is an "R" and the R's are in charge.
When R's are in charge lying under oath by R's is considered acceptable.
More bullshit.....Congressional Democrats won't touch it....didn't request it....and won't....
The 2nd in command at the DOJ is a democrat....all they gotta do is make the request.....
zappasguitar
Well-known member
He hasn't been duped.
Yo Yo is just another partisan hack who will tell any lie to cover for Trump and his administration.
Sessions was not even answering the question when he made the statement, it was not limited to the campaign, Sessions statement was untrue.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Prove it.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
So you have no proof he did anything in the course of the campaign, but you can claim he lied. That would not hold up in any court.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
To explain it was not in the course of the campaign, but in his official role.
You are so dumb.