Remember When?

Althea said:
The question was whether or not he was under oath? It seems like a pretty simple question...no?

Just because he didn't respond to the question posed, doesn't mean that the told the truth under oath.
Click to expand...

that's asinine. of course he was under oath, but he answered the question posed to him, truthfully i might add. If they wanted to catch him lying, they should not have tried to trap him with the words 'trump campaign'.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
that's asinine. of course he was under oath, but he answered the question posed to him, truthfully i might add. If they wanted to catch him lying, they should not have tried to trap him with the words 'trump campaign'.
Click to expand...

The man lied. Deal with it. He lied on paper and under oath.

"In a separate questionnaire, Sessions more directly denied personally contacting any Russian officials regarding the 2016 election.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

Sessions responded, in total: "No."
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the above is an important part to determine whether he lied.........do you have proof that he talked to any russian in question about the above subject?????
Click to expand...

Kirk3-3.jpg
 
christiefan915 said:
The man lied. Deal with it. He lied on paper and under oath.

"In a separate questionnaire, Sessions more directly denied personally contacting any Russian officials regarding the 2016 election.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

Sessions responded, in total: "No."
Click to expand...
About the election. Do you have proof he talked about the election?
 
Althea said:
First, without prompting, the idiot brought himself under the umbrella of 'campaign surrogate'. He then went on to lie about meeting with the Russians.
Click to expand...

Franken's question is clearly about the Trump campaign and the if the Trump campaign surrogates communicated with the Russians....can't you freakin' read....

He plainly uses those very words in the question.....

Thats the context in which Sessions answered and its obvious he didn't lie about it.....
 
Yaya said:
I'll take that as a big fat no and you lied once again.
Click to expand...

Cfan is becoming more unhinged by the minute....

A State Department spokesperson told Business Insider in an email, the State Department has invited foreign ambassadors to both the DNC and RNC "as observers of our democratic process" since the 1980s. The State Department manages invitations, logistics, and security, and ambassadors are responsible for their own expenses, including flight and hotel accomodations. The convention committees develop the programming the ambassadors participate in or attend.
In 2016, it was the Obama State Dept. that invited these
Ambassadors to both the RNC and DNC meetings...
http://www.businessinsider.com/why-jeff-sessions-spoke-to-russian-ambassador-rnc-2017-3

Is she claiming that the Obama State Dept. set up a meeting between Sessions and the Russian ambassador ? He invited the ambassador, not Sessions.
 
Althea said:
The question was whether or not he was under oath? It seems like a pretty simple question...no?

Just because he didn't respond to the question posed, doesn't mean that the told the truth under oath.
Click to expand...

I am deeply enjoying watching all the petty Trumpkins make one excuse after another as to why Sessions shouldn't be held accountable for lying under oath.

:rofl2:
 
ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL!

Not a single JPP Rightie can counter my claim!

One after another it's just derogatory name calling, derisive put downs and childish attacks from dim bulb Trumpkins who desperately change my posts so they won't have to deal with the truth.

#WINNING!!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL!

Not a single JPP Rightie can counter my claim!

One after another it's just derogatory name calling, derisive put downs and childish attacks from dim bulb Trumpkins who desperately change my posts so they won't have to deal with the truth.

#WINNING!!
Click to expand...

How many more 'counters' to your claim do you need ?

Truth Detector said:
Dear moron; no one lied under oath in this case. But remember when Liberals defended BillyBob Clinton's lies? Remember when Liberals defended Hitlery Clinton's lies? How is it that they are suddenly concerned about lies?
Click to expand...

SmarterthanYou said:
i'd be the first in line to impeach sessions, or at the very least have him silenced and excommunicated, but this is bullshit zappa. he didn't LIE under oath
Click to expand...

Yaya said:
Sessions answered the question posed to him, about the campaign, he truthfully answered no.

Zappas lies on a daily basis and he will never admit Sessions didn't lie.

It is simply rolling in the mud with the pigs.
Click to expand...

SmarterthanYou said:
the question asked to him was about involvement with the trump campaign. you HAVE to remember, it's wordspeak with these statist fuckers that mean to rule us and you fell for it. it's as bad as 'the meaning of the word 'is''.
Click to expand...

NOVA said:
Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."
========================
He was asked during the hearing about communications between Russia and the Trump campaign — not about meetings he took as a senator and a member of the Armed Services Committee.
Where exactly is the lie or the attempt to deceive considering both the question and the answer in context
Click to expand...

NOVA said:
Franken's question is clearly about the Trump campaign and the if the Trump campaign surrogates communicated with the Russians....can't you freakin' read....

He plainly uses those very words in the question.....

Thats the context in which Sessions answered and its obvious he didn't lie about it.....
Click to expand...
 
ZappasGuitar said:
ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL!

Not a single JPP Rightie can counter my claim!

One after another it's just derogatory name calling, derisive put downs and childish attacks from dim bulb Trumpkins who desperately change my posts so they won't have to deal with the truth.

#WINNING!!
Click to expand...

.

#STILL
WINNING!!
 
christiefan915 said:
The man lied. Deal with it. He lied on paper and under oath.

"In a separate questionnaire, Sessions more directly denied personally contacting any Russian officials regarding the 2016 election.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

Sessions responded, in total: "No."
Click to expand...
Hillary Clinton lied under oath several times, tell me why she is different?

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top