Ethical Question: Cloning Neanderthal

Dick from the Internet said:
I am discussing the ethics of enslaving humans. My question was about that same thing.

I am not on a tangent. You are a fucking moron and a coward who is trying to change the subject to abortion because you don't want to address the point I made about the ethics of enslaving humans.
Click to expand...

And I was discussing the enslavement of other species.

As we breed other species for both food and forced labor.

Why do you pull this one species out of the pack?

Do you feel a kinship?

Would you eat monkey meat?
 
Taft2016 said:
He said he expects to see it in his lifetime. That was my point, which you dismissed.

So, you were wrong.

Again.

Sad.

Just as you have to keep dragging conversations off onto irrelevant tangents.

Sad.
Click to expand...

He said you were gullible and a scientific illiterate.

Yeah, "it may someday be possible." I understand. Speculation about future technologies and the ethics that surround them sounds a hell of a lot science fiction, dumbfuck.
 
Taft2016 said:
And I was discussing the enslavement of other species.

As we breed other species for both food and forced labor.

Why do you pull this one species out of the pack?

Do you feel a kinship?

Would you eat monkey meat?
Click to expand...

I have told you several times it's the only one that is human, you fucking moron.
 
As for kinship, well I am white so there's a good chance. Again you do realize this clone might very well be able to mate with modern humans. Do you understand how that makes it different than your pig?
 
Dick from the Internet said:
He said you were gullible and a scientific illiterate.

Yeah, "it may someday be possible." I understand. Speculation about future technologies and the ethics that surround them sounds a hell of a lot science fiction, dumbfuck.
Click to expand...

He expects to see it in his lifetime.

Also, Der Spiegel stands by their story:

So in the course of trying to secure biological diversity, we should also anticipate the rise of a whole society of Neanderthals advocating for unknown political values, perhaps forming their own Pleistocene Party with a view, as Church notes in the interview, to dealing with future planetary catastrophes: “When the time comes to deal with an epidemic or getting off the planet or whatever, it’s conceivable that their way of thinking could be beneficial.” The German magazine naturally bristles at Church’s allegation that he was mistranslated, pointing out that he was in fact allowed to review a transcript of the interview before publication. Der Spiegel blames “tabloid journalism,” as practiced not least by the Daily Mail, for the subsequent blowup. That may be. It’s true that you can’t trust British newspapers.
Click to expand...

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/01/an_apology_for_/

Regardless, I understand your need for diversion when getting so thoroughly thrashed on the topic at hand.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Wow, you are really dumb. Try one more time...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Click to expand...

Damn you are a dumbFUCK

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
 
Taft2016 said:
He expects to see it in his lifetime.

Also, Der Spiegel stands by their story:

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/01/an_apology_for_/

Regardless, I understand your need for diversion when getting so thoroughly thrashed on the topic at had.
Click to expand...


You are not thrashing anyone, you fool. I am not arguing that it is not possible or even unlikely. You are only off on this because you are two chicken shit to answer a simple question.
 
Bigdog said:
Damn you are a dumbFUCK

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Click to expand...


States do not abort anyone, dumbass.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
RU seriously so senile that you forgot?
Click to expand...

You type out so much stupid shit, it's hard to keep track of it. Even if I wanted to...

Besides, this is a discussion of ethics, so there's really no right or wrong answer to anything. I said that long ago.

Whatever the scenario is, it's just opinions to generate conversations. Which you continually shit up with your stupidity and Tarzan chest thumping.
 
You want to try these ethics questions, Dick?

Is an unborn human a person? ... at what point do you draw the line when defining what constitutes a person? ... is a human life sacred even if it's not a "person"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top