Remember When?

ROFL!!

I'm still waiting for a JPP Rightie to address my OP.

I thought if I gave you all some time, someone might actually do so.

Turns out I was wasting my time waiting on any JPP Rightie to respond to my OP with anything other than the same diversions.

Translation:

:legion:
 
Dear moron; no one lied under oath in this case. But remember when Liberals defended BillyBob Clinton's lies? Remember when Liberals defended Hitlery Clinton's lies? How is it that they are suddenly concerned about lies?

Another Truth Rejector LIE.

Jeff Sessions clearly lied under oath.

But don't worry, I gave up on getting any honest comment from you MONTHS ago.
 
Lol, Zappa mad because no one takes his troll bait. He admitted these types of threads are nothing but shit stirring troll threads that he won't take the bait and condemn the OP, but of course he demands others condemn his troll threads.
 
i'd be the first in line to impeach sessions, or at the very least have him silenced and excommunicated, but this is bullshit zappa. he didn't LIE under oath

Sessions stated quite plainly while under oath:

"I did not have communications with the Russians.”

As it turns out, Mr. Sessions met twice with Mr. Kislyak, once at the Republican National Convention in July, and again in his Senate office in September.

And everyone remembers what Republicans said about lying under oath when they impeached Clinton:

It doesn't matter what he lied ABOUT.

What matters is he LIED UNDER OATH.
 
Another Truth Rejector LIE.

Jeff Sessions clearly lied under oath.

But don't worry, I gave up on getting any honest comment from you MONTHS ago.

Fascinating; a sociopathic lying leftist loser claiming others are lying. But alas, Jeff Sessions did not lie under oath and you can carry as much DNC water as you wish like the lemming that you are and rant like a brain dead lunatic with Trump Derangement Syndrome; it wont alter the FACTS....just like it won't change the election results.

Moron.
 
He wasn't under oath during his testimony before Congress?

No he was not; and the claims that he was are a massive pile of liberal loony bullshit that wont change the election results.

So attempt to extract your head from your asshole so that tiny pea brain can get a little oxygen to comprehend the OBVIOUS. Dunce.
 
Sessions answered the question posed to him, about the campaign, he truthfully answered no.

Zappas lies on a daily basis and he will never admit Sessions didn't lie.

It is simply rolling in the mud with the pigs.
 
Sessions stated quite plainly while under oath:

"I did not have communications with the Russians.”

As it turns out, Mr. Sessions met twice with Mr. Kislyak, once at the Republican National Convention in July, and again in his Senate office in September.

And everyone remembers what Republicans said about lying under oath when they impeached Clinton:

It doesn't matter what he lied ABOUT.

What matters is he LIED UNDER OATH.

The question was in regards to when he was a member of the Trump Adminstration.

Of course, in liberal dumbfuck land, a high ranking Senator should not have met with any ambassadors while doing his job.

You simple minded morons really are priceless. And the irony for idiots like you who get just about EVERYTHING wrong because you swallow the swill dished up by the DNC and FAKE media like lemmings, is that when it is once again proven that you are wrong, you will once again double down your lunacy to remove any doubt what a bunch of morons you people really are.

Alas; you lack the intelligence to comprehend the OBVIOUS or REALITY. Dunce.
 
Sessions answered the question posed to him, about the campaign, he truthfully answered no.

Zappas lies on a daily basis and he will never admit Sessions didn't lie.

It is simply rolling in the mud with the pigs.
Um...no. He wasn't asked about himself. He was asked if anyone involved with the trump campaign spoke with Russian officials. He just answered in the first person, trying to hide the truth.

Under oath.
 
Um...no. He wasn't asked about himself. He was asked if anyone involved with the trump campaign spoke with Russian officials. He just answered in the first person, trying to hide the truth.

Under oath.

...and he answered that he was not aware anyone had. DUNCE.

Basically, Al the dumbfuck Franken was asking a really stupid question that points nowhere but to the Obama administration and the stupidity of the DNC for not securing their servers better. The RNC servers were not hacked because the attempt failed.

Now if you idiots weren't brain dead, a better question is why do you accept the corrupt way the DNC handled Sanders and handed the nomination to a corrupt lying sociopathic political hack like Clinton.

I get it; you're only concerned about imagined lies and dishonest from the Republicans. If it is Obama and Democrats lying to you, you swallow that Kool-Aid like a gullible dunce.
 
Um...no. He wasn't asked about himself. He was asked if anyone involved with the trump campaign spoke with Russian officials. He just answered in the first person, trying to hide the truth.

Under oath.

Nope. Try harder.

Looking at the transcripts from the hearing, however, it’s not 100 percent clear that Sessions made an intentionally false statement, though he appears to have omitted relevant information.

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

While one can argue that Sessions should have mentioned his meetings with Kislyak at the hearing, it’s possible he didn’t perjure himself based on the question Franken asked.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...t-what-jeff-sessions-told-al-franken-about-m/
 
Well well well!

We've got one angry Trumpkin calling me every petty name his tiny little double digit IQ can think of.

We've got ANOTHER Trumpkin feverishly playing his silly word parsing games so he doesn't have to admit I am right yet again.

IN OTHER WORDS...I am right, they know it, but in typical JPP Trumpkin fashion they simply can't bring themselves to admit the truth!

:rofl2:
 
Um...no. He wasn't asked about himself. He was asked if anyone involved with the trump campaign spoke with Russian officials. He just answered in the first person, trying to hide the truth.

Under oath.

Sessions said quite clearly, while UNDER OATH:

"I did not have communications with the Russians."

Except he DID!

IOW...HE LIED!

EOS.
 
The question was in regards to when he was a member of the Trump Adminstration.

Of course, in liberal dumbfuck land, a high ranking Senator should not have met with any ambassadors while doing his job.

You simple minded morons really are priceless. And the irony for idiots like you who get just about EVERYTHING wrong because you swallow the swill dished up by the DNC and FAKE media like lemmings, is that when it is once again proven that you are wrong, you will once again double down your lunacy to remove any doubt what a bunch of morons you people really are.

Alas; you lack the intelligence to comprehend the OBVIOUS or REALITY. Dunce.


Spin spin spin away!

Make your excuses and play your petty little word games!

Sessions LIED under oath and you know it!

:rofl2:
 
Nope. Try harder.

Looking at the transcripts from the hearing, however, it’s not 100 percent clear that Sessions made an intentionally false statement, though he appears to have omitted relevant information.

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

While one can argue that Sessions should have mentioned his meetings with Kislyak at the hearing, it’s possible he didn’t perjure himself based on the question Franken asked.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...t-what-jeff-sessions-told-al-franken-about-m/

ROFL!

More hypocritical word games from the same crew who one upon a time felt LYING UNDER OATH was so serious they impeached Bil Clinton for doing it.

Now, SHOCKINGLY, they feel different about it since it's a Republican caught lying under oath.
 
ROFL!

More hypocritical word games from the same crew who one upon a time felt LYING UNDER OATH was so serious they impeached Bil Clinton for doing it.

Now, SHOCKINGLY, they feel different about it since it's a Republican caught lying under oath.
You stupid shithead, that is from politico. You can't even tell the truth about who wrote what.

You're damn liar. Even politico admits it wasn't a lie. But oh no, Zappas is the arbiter of all things and he never is wrong and he never lies.

You LOSE Zippy.
 
He wasn't under oath during his testimony before Congress?

the question asked to him was about involvement with the trump campaign. you HAVE to remember, it's wordspeak with these statist fuckers that mean to rule us and you fell for it. it's as bad as 'the meaning of the word 'is''.
 
Back
Top