UK gets smart - Starting today text-drivers now face automatic loss of license

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Text-drivers are psychopaths with zero concern for the lives of others. They will never change and should never be allowed to drive again.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...using-phone-wheel-will-lose-licence-new-laws/

1 MARCH 2017 • 11:25AM
New drivers who are caught using a phone at the wheel will lose their licence under new legislation that comes into force today.

From Wednesday anyone found calling, texting or using an app while driving will face a £200 on-the-spot fine and six points on their licence.

It means that new drivers – who can lose a maximum of six points before being banned for the first two years after passing their test– will face an immediate ban for sending a single text message.

Previously they were able to avoid getting points on their licence by taking part in retraining courses.

More experienced motorists can lose their licence if they receive 12 points in a three-year period.
Click to expand...
 
cawacko said:
So did you lose a family member or something?
Click to expand...

Hey stupid. You probably oppose terrorism though i bet you have never lost a relative to that.

Text-drivers are literally a THOUSAND times bigger risk to you than terrorists and if you had any brains you'd oppose them too. THINK, psychopath.
 
cawacko said:
So did you lose a family member or something?
Click to expand...

Why should that have anything to do with it? I've never lost a family member to murder, a drunk driver, or other things of a similar situation. Does that mean I shouldn't oppose those types of things?

I once served as a volunteer Firefighter/EMT. I've cut innocent people, dead, out of cars while their parents, spouse, and/or friends watched crying the entire time.

I was called for jury duty in my local area several years ago when I was volunteering. One of the cases on the docket for that week involved a drunk driving case. As part of the selection process, each potential juror had to stand up, give their name, their spouses name if married, what type of work they did, what type of work their spouse did, etc. I did that also mentioning what I did as a volunteer. The defense attorney and/or solicitor could excuse jurors if they thought something in that potential jurors life might cause bias, etc. I remember someone, and I think it was the defense attorney, asking me if I thought I could be unbiased in such a trial. I said "no". When he asked me why, I responded by asking him had he ever cut an innocent person out of a car where a drunk driver had killed or severely injured them. He also responded with "no". I told him that is he ever had to do it only once, he wouldn't ask someone like me that question again. I was excused.
 
CFM said:
Why should that have anything to do with it? I've never lost a family member to murder, a drunk driver, or other things of a similar situation. Does that mean I shouldn't oppose those types of things?

I once served as a volunteer Firefighter/EMT. I've cut innocent people, dead, out of cars while their parents, spouse, and/or friends watched crying the entire time.

I was called for jury duty in my local area several years ago when I was volunteering. One of the cases on the docket for that week involved a drunk driving case. As part of the selection process, each potential juror had to stand up, give their name, their spouses name if married, what type of work they did, what type of work their spouse did, etc. I did that also mentioning what I did as a volunteer. The defense attorney and/or solicitor could excuse jurors if they thought something in that potential jurors life might cause bias, etc. I remember someone, and I think it was the defense attorney, asking me if I thought I could be unbiased in such a trial. I said "no". When he asked me why, I responded by asking him had he ever cut an innocent person out of a car where a drunk driver had killed or severely injured them. He also responded with "no". I told him that is he ever had to do it only once, he wouldn't ask someone like me that question again. I was excused.
Click to expand...

Considering his screen name and the number of times he has posted on this issue its not unreasonable to think its personal to him.
 
CFM said:
Why should that have anything to do with it? I've never lost a family member to murder, a drunk driver, or other things of a similar situation. Does that mean I shouldn't oppose those types of things?

I once served as a volunteer Firefighter/EMT. I've cut innocent people, dead, out of cars while their parents, spouse, and/or friends watched crying the entire time.

I was called for jury duty in my local area several years ago when I was volunteering. One of the cases on the docket for that week involved a drunk driving case. As part of the selection process, each potential juror had to stand up, give their name, their spouses name if married, what type of work they did, what type of work their spouse did, etc. I did that also mentioning what I did as a volunteer. The defense attorney and/or solicitor could excuse jurors if they thought something in that potential jurors life might cause bias, etc. I remember someone, and I think it was the defense attorney, asking me if I thought I could be unbiased in such a trial. I said "no". When he asked me why, I responded by asking him had he ever cut an innocent person out of a car where a drunk driver had killed or severely injured them. He also responded with "no". I told him that is he ever had to do it only once, he wouldn't ask someone like me that question again. I was excused.
Click to expand...

For instance, the number of times you NL its not unreasonable to think your daughter is a mudshark like TDAK's is.
 
cawacko said:
For instance, the number of times you NL its not unreasonable to think your daughter is a mudshark like TDAK's is.
Click to expand...

As many times as you've brought what I posted, it's not unreasonable to think YOU are one.

As for my daughter, that won't happen. Guaranteed.
 
inexcusable how movies show people text-driving all the time. They treat it like it is totally acceptable and the general public falls for this deadly brainwashing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top