IN YOUR FACE DICK FROM THE INTERNET!!!

B

BRUTALITOPS

on indefiniate mod break
Contributor
"A CBS News poll conducted last April found even stronger Republican opposition to the sort of meddling Spicer predicted. Asked if "laws regarding whether the use of marijuana is legal" should be "determined by the federal government" or "left to each individual state government to decide," 70 percent of Republicans said the latter, compared to 55 percent of Democrats (who as usual were more likely to favor legalization). These results make sense to the extent that conservatives take seriously their avowed commitment to federalism,"

http://reason.com/blog/2017/02/24/most-republicans-oppose-federal-interfer

I said both parties are bad and you mocked me. Turns out republicans are better on the feds not dicking with marijuana than democrats are.
 
How is that in my face? I never made any claim about what the people CLAIM to support but how the actions of politicians make one appear advantageous to the other in the WH.

I am still skeptical that they will do much at all because of the things mentioned in the article. Hopefully, those Republicans will stand up for California and other states, but my guess is they will instead choose to be partisan dicks.

What do you say about the Republican board members that are supporting/rationalizing this new policy? You are so busy supporting your false equivalencies you have no time to bother criticizing Trump for his threatened assault on liberty.
 
The mod with no name said:
"A CBS News poll conducted last April found even stronger Republican opposition to the sort of meddling Spicer predicted. Asked if "laws regarding whether the use of marijuana is legal" should be "determined by the federal government" or "left to each individual state government to decide," 70 percent of Republicans said the latter, compared to 55 percent of Democrats (who as usual were more likely to favor legalization). These results make sense to the extent that conservatives take seriously their avowed commitment to federalism,"

http://reason.com/blog/2017/02/24/most-republicans-oppose-federal-interfer

I said both parties are bad and you mocked me. Turns out republicans are better on the feds not dicking with marijuana than democrats are.
Click to expand...

A poll from last April has as much value as your Moms choice in a mate
 
The mod with no name said:
"A CBS News poll conducted last April found even stronger Republican opposition to the sort of meddling Spicer predicted. Asked if "laws regarding whether the use of marijuana is legal" should be "determined by the federal government" or "left to each individual state government to decide," 70 percent of Republicans said the latter, compared to 55 percent of Democrats (who as usual were more likely to favor legalization). These results make sense to the extent that conservatives take seriously their avowed commitment to federalism,"

http://reason.com/blog/2017/02/24/most-republicans-oppose-federal-interfer

I said both parties are bad and you mocked me. Turns out republicans are better on the feds not dicking with marijuana than democrats are.
Click to expand...


OMG anyone else starts a thread in the current events forum with that title and Grind would boot them in a heartbeat.

Further proof that some Mods don't live by the rules they expect us to follow.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
OMG anyone else starts a thread in the current events forum with that title and Grind would boot them in a heartbeat.

Further proof that some Mods don't live by the rules they expect us to follow.
Click to expand...
That is rich coming from you, who never lives by standards he demands others live by.
 
Yet another example of Zappas two faced idiocy. He claims that changing people's posts makes you a liar and other bad names, yet he thanks Rune for doing that.

Poor two faced Zappas.
 
Yaya said:
Yet another example of Zappas two faced idiocy. He claims that changing people's posts makes you a liar and other bad names, yet he thanks Rune for doing that.

Poor two faced Zappas.
Click to expand...

When did I admit thanking Rune for changing what you posted?

Whoopsie!!

Looks like it's just another Yo Yo ASSumption.
 
Yaya said:
You thanked his post wherein he altered my post. Dumbass liar. How can you possibly lie about something you just did?
Click to expand...

Yes, I thanked him.

How do you know WHAT I thanked him FOR?

It could have been his witty riposte to your asinine comment.

Save your breath, you CAN'T KNOW what I thanked him for.

You ASSumed what you liked and it came back to burn you once more.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Yes, I thanked him.

How do you know WHAT I thanked him FOR?

It could have been his witty riposte to your asinine comment.

Save your breath, you CAN'T KNOW what I thanked him for.

You ASSumed what you liked and it came back to burn you once more.
Click to expand...

I see, it was his witty riposte, "I know, right." Which was directly related to his altered post. If he didn't alter my post, his words would be agreeing with me, instead, they only make sense because he altered my post.

So tell me, why did you thank his post?
 
Yaya said:
I see, it was his witty riposte, "I know, right." Which was directly related to his altered post. If he didn't alter my post, his words would be agreeing with me, instead, they only make sense because he altered my post.

So tell me, why did you thank his post?
Click to expand...

It was his witty riposte to your delusional comment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top