I think the court might be looking at this as an intellectual exercise until they get the Windows 10 version of solitaire on their computers. There's some big hurdles to clear in this case. First, let's talk about exactly WHAT was "cyber invaded". To the best of my knowledge, HRC's PRIVATE, ILLEGAL server, Podesta's PRIVATE, badly secured email, and the DNC, which is a non-governmental entity. There was an ATTEMPT to get into the RNC's junk, but they got out in front of it an locked it down. So as far as I know, nothing sovereign to the U.S. was "cyber invaded". Now if this thing goes through, when Trump is elected(again), the first thing he should do is fetch Bradley Manning from whatever Vegas female impersonator show he's in, and revoke his pardon, because he DEFINITELY took official, classified information from U.S. government sources and distributed it. Same goes for those leftover deep state IC fucks betraying their oaths.
Hacking of the DNC emails is a far cry from the accusation that the election or their results were compromised...
Not even one state gov. ever claimed that the election results in their states was compromised in any way.....
Hillary's emails were never proven to be hacked at all....any and all of her emails made public were made public by the US State Dept.
The end for Trump will come when he is forced to produce his taxes.
He'd rather quit.
The end for Trump will come when he is forced to produce his taxes.
He'd rather quit.
That's not the basis of their argument though.Yes, we know all about the little bullshit word game you rightards keep trying to play regarding this issue.
But for the one millionth time I will reiterate yet again.
Nobody is claiming the actual voting machines or ballot count were hacked or altered, so please stop using that to deflect.
The issue here is whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian govt or any groups working for the Russian govt, for the purpose of negatively influencing public opinion against Clinton and helping Trump get more votes while taking votes away from Clinton.
It's so simple that even the dumbest right-wing yard ape should be able to grasp it.
Hopefully you won't need to have it explained to you again.
Do you think that will happen? I doubt it, unless we get a Democratic house or Senate in 18'.
I think that is unlikely, looking at the numbers.
Do you think that will happen? I doubt it, unless we get a Democratic house or Senate in 18'.
I think that is unlikely, looking at the numbers.
That's not the basis of their argument though.
"Diane Blumstein, Nancy Goodman, and Donna Soodalter-Toman argue in the case, that Russia cyber invaded America and that our Intelligence Community’s reports in October and January, along with the FBI’s public statements prove that our Executive Branch concluded a foreign invader influenced the 2016 elections." That's from these wackadoos: http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/02/23/supreme-court-just-advanced-law-suit-nullify-2016-election/ so take it up with them.
And BTW, the term "yard ape" refers to a black person. It's derivation is from the lawn ornaments of black coachmen holding lanterns, or black children fishing, or many of the other lawn ornaments of that type. It has devolved into a perjorative term for blacks. yard ape definition by Urban Dictionary.Nov 27, 2014
It's so simple that even the dumbest, most racist leftard, man-bun wearing twinklepuff should be able to grasp it. Hopefully you won't need to have it explained to you again.


50 Shades of Butthurt. Never ends. lmao
March 17, may it be a day of infamy.
I see you're couching your prediction there, Fucking Viking. LOL
There is a difference between praying for something and predicting it snot weasel.