more double standards of law and justice in california

[Taft2016]

so if I see a woman parking a ford expedition in the parking lot and walk away, just to see some man, 5 minutes later, walk up and attempt to drive away, I should automatically assume he isn't stealing the car??????

You can assume whatever the hell you want to. You just can't stop people, and you certainly can't shoot them because they won't listen to you.

and this is you still being a moron. you are stuck on the retarded notion that I would start blasting because you walked up to the table when that is just not what i said i would do. I WOULD stop you and you WOULD resist and walk away, which WOULD prompt me to restrain you, or at the very least KEEP the laptop from you. Would you then assault me????

This "resist" element is new to this continued discussion. So obviously you're backpedaling. Which is understandable. The original conversation was me walking away and you shooting me in the ass because I deserved it.

Regardless, we can play. You illegally place your hands on me, I legally remove them and walk away. What happens next?

Again from the link:

The Supreme Court of Texas, interpreting this statute, stated: “The owner or lawful custodian of stolen property, by virtue of the rights and privileges given him, under the article above quoted, has
the right to pursue the thief and recapture property which has been stolen without a warrant of arrest.”61

However, you can not come after me because you are not the owner of the property. In fact, you don't even know who the owner of the property is.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You can assume whatever the hell you want to. You just can't stop people, and you certainly can't shoot them because they won't listen to you.

This "resist" element is new to this continued discussion. So obviously you're backpedaling. Which is understandable. The original conversation was me walking away and you shooting me in the ass because I deserved it.

Regardless, we can play. You illegally place your hands on me, I legally remove them and walk away. What happens next?

Again from the link:

However, you can not come after me because you are not the owner of the property. In fact, you don't even know who the owner of the property is.

the ONLY two facts necessary are
1) a woman set up the laptop and used it, then walked away.
2) a man came in and tried to take the laptop.

you really should read the whole article, in its entirety, before making such stupid conclusions, but then again....you are/were a cop and that's what you're programmed to do.

 

[Taft2016]

the ONLY two facts necessary are
1) a woman set up the laptop and used it, then walked away.
2) a man came in and tried to take the laptop.

Only two facts necessary are:
1) the woman was my wife.
2) It was my laptop.

Funny how vile you are when police shoot people mistakenly, but are so quick to justify it when you do it yourself.

 

[Truth Detector]

more proof you have a penchant for blowing badges.

More evidence that you're an ignorant dishonest whack job on steroids.

he can be seen CLEARLY trying to drag a kid through the bushes and ON to his property. we call that ASSAULT, you mindless cop sucker.

Dear dishonest dumbass; he was dragging the kid onto an ADJACENT property while trying to hold onto the kid after getting assaulted by thug teens and when they once again surrounded him attempting to assault him to get their thug buddy released, he pulled the weapon firing a warning shot.

Again; anyone with a brain cannot watch that video and believe that the cop was in the wrong. It was a group of smart assed punks who ignored numerous warnings to stay off the lawn....of course, in dumbfuck land where you wallow, private property rights mean nothing....or self defense for that matter.

You are a PUNK with a tiny brain the size of a pea.

more badge blowing bias as you willfully ignore the fact I stated above about him assaulting a kid.

Dear dishonest dumbfuck; he was trying to HOLD onto the kid until the cops arrived....then got assaulted by several more teens.

If you watched that video and believe the OFF DUTY cop was doing the assaulting, you have your dumb empty head shoved up your asshole.

why don't you tell us how that works so well for you. and just so you may remember, my idea about defending ones self from assault and bodily harm is clearly evident in my support of zimmerman, you idiot statist fuckstick.

Dear moron; I don't give a shit what you thought in the Zimmerman case, on this one, you're not only wrong, but acting like a raving lunatic moron on steroids over it because.....wait for it......it involved a COP.

You really need to seek professional help for that cop hating obsession you have shit-for-brains.

 

[Truth Detector]

It's nobody's damned business. And we've been through this ad nauseum... YOU HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO STOP ANYBODY.

And where did this alleged assault come from? I am ignoring you and walking away.

Doesn't matter. You're going to prison after this incident. For a loooong time.

Are you two talking about a REAL incident or imagined???? Its confusing the debate here.

 

[Truth Detector]

Yep... NUFF SAID!!!

Get your head out of your ass BillyBob.

 

[Truth Detector]

tell us again, oh cop sucker, why this isn't a double standard of justice????

http://www.richmond.com/news/local/...cle_fdc53688-8a3f-584e-b9cd-4b95b46012b8.html

The defense attorney for the Mechanicsville woman accused of fatally shooting another woman at the Walmart in Ashland late Saturday said his client did not mean to kill the victim and that she was being teased by two men for being a lesbian and responded by firing a warning shot into the air.

It was that bullet, fired by Brittany Lashea Wiggins, that incidentally struck and killed Ashley Fricke, a woman who was not involved in the altercation and whom Wiggins had never met, defense attorney Joe Morrissey said in an interview.

“The errant bullet, unbeknownst to (Wiggins), strikes a woman, who has nothing to do with this incident, in the parking lot,” Morrissey said Tuesday evening.

Wiggins, a 24-year-old graduate of Lee-Davis High School, has been charged with first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony and shooting into an occupied vehicle in the death of Fricke, 25, of Caroline County.

Dear idiot on steroids; if you think these two cases are identical, you're not merely retarded, but a dishonest dumbass on steroids.

 

[Truth Detector]

the most repulsive thing about you (as well as many others) is that you refuse to accept just what law enforcement is. they are nothing more than legal execution squads, the enforcement arm of the government. they are government agents.

^Evidence that SmarterthanFEW is a whacked out sick individual in desperate need of professional treatment.

You really are one repugnant dumbass on steroids dude. Seriously. Someone should shoot you and put you out of your misery.

I hope you're the next statistic after the cops pull you over, and you pull your weapon out like a dumbass.

 

[Truth Detector]

Why didn't the so called officer call the cops like they tell us to do instead of mishandling the situation of "walking on his lawn" on his own??

You don't have the whole story BillyBob; the police were called and he was attempting to hold onto the youth until they arrived. He was resisting and then his thug buddies jumped in assaulting the off duty cop.

I can't imagine anyone in Calif manhandling a kid for walking on his lawn & then discharging a round w/ a dozen teenagers a few feet away NOT GOING TO JAIL & RECEIVING MULTIPLE CHARGES!!!!! EXCEPT SOME THAT IS "ABOVE THE LAW"...........

That is because you're a moron of equal standing with SmarterthanFEW.

If you have a bunch of punks constantly ignoring your requests and loitering on your lawn; you're going to do something about it because unless the cops are right there, they can't do a thing.

The OFF duty cop was trying to hold the punk until the cops arrived.

Yeah I know, the BIG BAD cop had a gun and the harmless thug teenagers were at a slight disadvantage and you libTards want to give all the advantages and rights to criminal thugs.

Moron.

 

[Truth Detector]

get it through your head...YOU were in the ACTIVE process of taking a laptop that EVERYBODY saw a woman using, NOT YOU!!!!!! therefore, YES we have the authority to stop you. and you still can't get a terry stop right. surrender whatever law degree or law enforcement certification you might have because you don't know how to use it.

You really are a moron of epic levels; I certainly hope you attempt to take the law into your own hands and pull your gun on someone.....please do it.

 

[Truth Detector]

No, you're just a psycho with a psychotic's perspective of law enforcement.

^Spot on.

 

[Truth Detector]

i was in fear for my life. it's worked for your kind for decades.

^Paranoid and whacko.....a deadly combo that can not end well for the psycho.

 

[Truth Detector]

so if I see a woman parking a ford expedition in the parking lot and walk away, just to see some man, 5 minutes later, walk up and attempt to drive away, I should automatically assume he isn't stealing the car??????

What you DON'T do is ASSume and then pull your gun on the man. Dumbfuck.

maybe I should become a cop, it seems like that's the best profession for my 'attitude'.

Wrong; you should turn yourself into the nearest psych ward and demand treatment.

Dunce.

 

[Taft2016]

Are you two talking about a REAL incident or imagined???? Its confusing the debate here.

It was a hypothetical scenario I presented to him once:

My wife was in Starbucks drinking coffee and using her laptop. I arrive in the parking lot to pick her up, she mistakenly leaves her laptop behind and then sends me in to retrieve it.

SmarterThanFew believes that he has a right to forcibly stop me and if I don't comply with his orders he is within his rights to shoot me, and that in doing so his home state of Texas will "hail him as a hero."

He genuinely has a mental defect.

 

[Bill]

It was a hypothetical scenario I presented to him once:

My wife was in Starbucks drinking coffee and using her laptop. I arrive in the parking lot to pick her up, she mistakenly leaves her laptop behind and then sends me in to retrieve it.

SmarterThanFew believes that he has a right to forcibly stop me and if I don't comply with his orders he is within his rights to shoot me, and that in doing so his home state of Texas will "hail him as a hero."

He genuinely has a mental defect.

Maybe he should just vet you first w/ his pistol upside your head???

 

[Truth Detector]

It was a hypothetical scenario I presented to him once:

My wife was in Starbucks drinking coffee and using her laptop. I arrive in the parking lot to pick her up, she mistakenly leaves her laptop behind and then sends me in to retrieve it.

SmarterThanFew believes that he has a right to forcibly stop me and if I don't comply with his orders he is within his rights to shoot me, and that in doing so his home state of Texas will "hail him as a hero."

He genuinely has a mental defect.

Ahhhh got it. Yes; smarterthanFEW does have mental issues like many here. He might make headlines someday.