Oh. My. God.

domer76 said:
lol

Right. All in 6,000 years. Actually, less, considering the Ark. Can you answer the question as to how the platypus, koala and kangaroo traveled from Turkey to Australia? Unharmed. With no mating until their destination.

Fucking unbelievable.
Click to expand...

Can you explain how the human eye evolved?
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Well, that's YOUR problem. What makes you think we're "light years beyond" anything in terms of actual evolution? Our society? Our technology? All that comes from a very small percentage of different genes from apes. Just because our technology has gotten exponentially better over the past 100 years or so doesn't mean we've evolved significantly in that time. We've gotten slightly taller on average as a species. That's about it.
Click to expand...

Actually the notion that man in present day for is due solely to RANDOM chance is statistically impossible

Additionally if libtards truly believe mankind descended from apes, why do they get so offended when people call the obamas monkeys and apes?
 
Taft2016 said:
And the point stands dumbass.

When an elephant or a tree can build a rocket and fly the Moon your point may be worth listening to.

But at the moment, you're as compelling as a naked bag lady running around in traffic.
Click to expand...

Again, that has nothing to do with the scientific proof supporting the theory of evolution. If you had a real problem with the science supporting the theory of evolution as it applies to human evolution then you should address that science. But that does not interest you because you are fucking stupid, chose your position based on nothing but whim and your need to identify with your ingroup.
 
Taft2016 said:
They might.

People get hung up the Biblical version of Creation without considering other possibilities. Creation could have been some sort of divine enlightenment of the chosen species to have dominion over the planet. Eating the apple in Eden could be a symbolic story of that enlightenment.



Like I said earlier, the ancient civilizations like Egypt seem to have sprung up from nothingness, and suddenly there was written language, science, arts, etc.

On an evolutionary calendar that is like going 0 to 60 in .02 seconds.

If man evolved, getting to this point without assistance seems incredibly improbable.

It's easy to look at a dinosaur and see how they could have evolved into birds. But apes into a man sitting in his home on a laptop communicating instantaneously with others around the entire planet?

No, I just can't buy that. I just can't buy that one species randomly flew light years beyond all others on the evolutionary scale.
Click to expand...

We have not. You are confusing technological advancement with evolution.
 
Angry Black Guy said:
Actually the notion that man in present day for is due solely to RANDOM chance is statistically impossible

Additionally if libtards truly believe mankind descended from apes, why do they get so offended when people call the obamas monkeys and apes?
Click to expand...

Ken Ham looks as ape like as anyone and of course there was Curious George Dubya. But your comment is meant to be racist.

It's not simply random chance. Natural selection guides evolution in somewhat predictable ways.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13698-evolution-myths-evolution-is-random/
 
Taft2016 said:
No, not at all.

You, OTOH, are completely dismissive of the capacity to develop technology, which would mean evolution only allowed such capacity to one species.

That would seem like an awfully random allowance.
Click to expand...

You obviously are.

The fact that we went from riding animals to flying to the moon in pretty short period was not a biological evolutionary advancement. It's a technological one.

Any tool use is technology and other animals use tools.

Again, you are not addressing the science relevant to the theory of evolution. Your process and approach are nothing but a joke designed to rationalize the result you want to find.
 
Taft2016 said:
No, not at all.

You, OTOH, are completely dismissive of the capacity to develop technology, which would mean evolution only allowed such capacity to one species.

That would seem like an awfully random allowance.
Click to expand...

Technology only means so much to us in terms of evolution. We use tools, the tools help us make other, better tools. That's about it. The fact we have microchips just comes from years of us making better tools with the same opposable thumbs, inquisitive nature, and problem solving skills that let use use tools in the first place.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
You obviously are.

The fact that we went from riding animals to flying to the moon in pretty short period was not a biological evolutionary advancement. It's a technological one.

Any tool use is technology and other animals use tools.

Again, you are not addressing the science relevant to the theory of evolution. Your process and approach are nothing but a joke designed to rationalize the result you want to find.
Click to expand...

And you're going to stick with it.

A chimp ramming a stick into a termite mound is just like the space shuttle.

A beaver building a dam is just like the Golden Gate Bridge.

You're deliberately ignoring the point that it's not the actual technology but the capacity to create the technology. Evolution can not explain how one species developed the capacity for these technological advancements that no other species can remotely come near.

And by repeatedly ignoring it, I'll take that as a tacit admission of defeat.
 
Taft2016 said:
And you're going to stick with it.

A chimp ramming a stick into a termite mound is just like the space shuttle.

A beaver building a dam is just like the Golden Gate Bridge.

You're deliberately ignoring the point that it's not the actual technology but the capacity to create the technology. Evolution can not explain how one species developed the capacity for these technological advancements that no other species can remotely come near.

And by repeatedly ignoring it, I'll take that as a tacit admission of defeat.
Click to expand...

Both are tool use. Neither are all that relevant to the proof for the theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution is not really intended to explain our technological advancement.

You have not defeated anyone you self deluded jackass. You are not even on topic.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Technology only means so much to us in terms of evolution. We use tools, the tools help us make other, better tools. That's about it. The fact we have microchips just comes from years of us making better tools with the same opposable thumbs, inquisitive nature, and problem solving skills that let use use tools in the first place.
Click to expand...

Technology is only a piece of it.

There are the arts, sciences, literature, music...

Where did that capacity come from and why has it eluded every other species?
 
Taft2016 said:
Well, isn't that convenient for the Theory of Evolution that it can skirt such a glaring discrepancy?
Click to expand...

There is no discrepancy.

Plenty of primates and birds have shown the ability to use tools. We have opposable thumbs which allowed us to use tools more readily and may have developed in tandem with our tool using capacities.

But the theory of evolution is not about technological advancement nor does it rely on that as a primary line of evidence in support. You are not addressing the theory of evolution as it relates to man.
 
Taft2016 said:
Technology is only a piece of it.

There are the arts, sciences, literature, music...

Where did that capacity come from and why has it eluded every other species?
Click to expand...

None of which addresses the theory of evolution or the science that supports it.

It has not.
 
Angry Black Guy said:
Actually the notion that man in present day for is due solely to RANDOM chance is statistically impossible

Additionally if libtards truly believe mankind descended from apes, why do they get so offended when people call the obamas monkeys and apes?
Click to expand...

Goddam, your massive ignorance is astounding. Only matched by your pathetic racist horseshit.

Fucking ignorant cunt.
 
Birds, whales and other animals show a capacity for music and some inclination towards arts. They sing, dance and decorate their homes.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
There is no discrepancy.

Plenty of primates and birds have shown the ability to use tools. We have opposable thumbs which allowed us to use tools more readily and may have developed in tandem with our tool using capacities.

But the theory of evolution is not about technological advancement nor does it rely on that as a primary line of evidence in support. You are not addressing the theory of evolution as it relates to man.
Click to expand...

It's a ridiculously facile broadbrushing to suggest a chimp sticking a branch into a termite mound reflects no significant evolutionary advancement than the space shuttle.

So naturally you *have* to say that such an advanced capacity has nothing to do with evolution. And on that we agree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top