Top US intelligence officials, Trump campaign did not collude with Russia

trump-wrong.gif


I believe the reports of Russian hacking because there is solid, irrefutable evidence of it and the IC has not backed off those claims.

Also, I am not now disputing any claims made by those same IC officials.

Imam disavowing Rancid Pubis and his exaggerated claim that the IC officials have declared the Trump campaign officially innocent of collusion in the matter.

You are either too thick skulled to see the difference between the two of you are just trying to engage in the typical, standard right wing obfuscation.

Either way, you FAIL.

Nope, you believed it before the proof was out.
 
==================================================================================================================================================================

“They made it very clear that that story in the New York Times is complete garbage,” Priebus replied. “Quite frankly they used different words than that, okay?”

“Who was it that said that, ” Wallace shot back.

“I’m not going to tell you,” Priebus parried.


“Wait a minute, Reince,” a frustrated Wallace exclaimed. “You just complained about unnamed sources. You’re using an unnamed source.”


http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/tha...ting-a-state-run-media/#.WKn4rAxmtUA.facebook

Well, that is hypocritical of him.
 
Nope, you believed it before the proof was out.

The Russian-Trump conspiracy theory falls under the rubric of 'unverified claim'. It may or may not be true---there's this little thing called evidence.

Trump gets called a liar when he makes them.
 
Back
Top