Milo tapped as Keynote Speaker at CPAC

I like the guy.

No, he's not Milton Friedman, but he engages people on their level and decimates them. He serves a purpose and I welcome him to the movement.

He is a lot smarter than he is being given credit for here, I don't agree with everything he says but it is just brilliant the way he boils the piss of the regressive left. He is a bit of a chameleon though, for instance his real name is Milo Hanrahan.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
The leftys want transparency and that's what we're giving them. With DJT what you see is what you get. Same with Milo and a few others. We're giving no phony PC...just transparency in spades. They should have been more careful of what they wished for. They can't handle it and it's worth the price of admission to watch their meltdown.

woods.jpg
 
I go back-and-forth about how receptive I would be to Douchebag Donald's message if he wasn't such a scumbag. I know I strongly opposed Huckabee for being a populist, but I respect the man for his decency and straightforwardness. I have always been intrigued by the notion of protectionism, suspecting it would have its day due to the trade deficits with China, and admitted back in 2000 when I started following politics, that I would be mildly interested in seeing a protectionist platform in action. Trump had done nothing his entire life when he announced that met my approval, and then he continued to piss me off throughout the primaries.

I don't support protectionism but i don't think that and nationalism are mutually exclusive.
 
my point is that because of your reeeeeeeee-fest and burning shit you've made milo's audience 10x bigger. All because you can't handle a little bit of free speech.

Ideas can't be contained or put down. You try to suppress them, they'll only arise stronger.

I could not give a shit about him. I found him mildly amusing, albeit a little irritating with his pissy antics. Certainly no one to be taken seriously.

However, you did reveal the complete and pathetic ignorance of your dad. Not surprising, however.
 
I don't support protectionism but i don't think that and nationalism are mutually exclusive.

I think in the annals of American history, protectionism hasn't been advocated by too many mainstream groups. Conservatives like Hamilton, Clay, and Lincoln advocated certain amounts of protectionism exclusively for the purpose of developing American industry from the ground-up. After the Civil War, when the second industrial revolution was under way, Republicans moved away from protectionism, and only flirted with it again at the outset of the Great Depression.

Jeffersonian and Jacksonian liberals, meanwhile, were basically opposed to tariffs, and basically advocated for free trade. While Jackson feuded with Calhoun over tariffs, both of them were at odds with the conservative north when it came to commerce and finance.

The emergence of leftism owes a lot to the globalist tendencies of Wilson, and then FDR. Unless there is a change in economic outlook brought on by the Sanders wing of the Democratic Party, then we shouldn't be seeing a push for protectionism anytime soon, as it is often likened to nativism. Neocons, who evolved from leftism, are obviously in the internationalist camp on most matters, as well.

Basically, protectionism never really had a lot of traction in American political life, despite the early history when Federalists and Whigs promoted it for pragmatic reasons.
 
my point is that because of your reeeeeeeee-fest and burning shit you've made milo's audience 10x bigger. All because you can't handle a little bit of free speech.

Ideas can't be contained or put down. You try to suppress them, they'll only arise stronger.

not to mention they have added pewdiepie to the nazi list with his audience of 53 million subscirbers. Which prompts many other smaller youtubers to defend him.
 
Who would have thought ten years ago a flaming gay guy would be one of conservatives leading speakers? My dad, who routinely listens to and worships michael savage and believes obama is an actual muslim from kenya has milos book pre-ordered now. That's how fucking stupid liberals are. They've made milo ten times stronger.

We live in a new day. Now being a conservative is to be radical, rebellious. The image of stuffy old parents wearing mr. rogers sweaters with an idealistic yet dopey liberal child has been replaced by stuffy old clinton supporters who have children rocking MAGA hats.

Again some of you keep falling for the propaganda and fake news about how milo is a "hatespeecher" .. no he isn't. He isn't anymore out of line than say someone like... ann coulter or michelle malkin. Maybe a bit incendiary but by far not outside of the realm of normal opinion.

Bingo.

I'm still waiting see what's so loathesome about the guy. I venture to say nothing.

Which tells us something: the left doesn't want this guy anywhere near college campuses. Want to try and reach today's college kids with Milton Friedman or Buckley? Good luck.

But a troll-ish flaming gay dude? Now you have their attention lol.

The actual rioters at Berkeley were probably funded by Soros. He knows a threat when he sees one.

Also, I agree that the next generation of rebels are going to rebel against the left, because the left has become the establishment: they've taken over practically every important institution.

Who wouldn't want to go back to the days of ideologically pure conservatism? But the political realities are what they are.

Let Milo roll.
 
Well for one his last name is impossible to pronounce.

I just saw him on Maher's show. He's like a young gay British twink version of Maher.

Now to be honest that wasn't his act but he strikes me as a comedian who's schtick is trolling. Well if so, no matter how offensive his material is...if he makes you laugh there has to be some truth there cause no one laughs at a lie.

I was actually impressed with Milo and will have to check out his act.

Not only that Milo is so adorable in a three snaps and a circle kinda way that he might actually be Watermarks best chance to get laid.
He's a gay Catholic, pushing Catholic guilt. There is nothing new in what he says, it's just funny because he is a self hating gay that is a practicing Catholic with Jewish heritage. He really isn't that funny or interesting. I'd rather listen to Lenny Bruce.
 
hes not really a troll. He speaks important truths, obviously with a bit of showmanship. Again, some of you old fucks (anyone older than me) need to get used to this. A paradigm shift has happened. This is the new normal. This is reality. You can't will it away. It is here.
He's a troll. He even said so in Maher's interview. I mean he's got a point that hyper partisan people need to get over themselves and Milo knows he's trolling or he wouldn't laugh at himself when told to "Go Fuck Himeself" when he insults people. As for speaking the truth, as I said earlier, anyone who makes you laugh is probably speaking a truth or you wouldn't be laughing. That's not the same as one always speaking the truth or even being right about a particular issue.

Anyone who takes Milo seriously on either side of the aisle needs to grow up and get over themselves.
 
In today's lexicon, nationalism is the rejection of globalism. We are in a different era.

What historical conservative would embrace globalism?

All. Conservatism has stood for free markets, free trade and the free movement of people. That doesn't mean open borders but it is not banning people and reducing legal immigration.

Go read any of Reagan's work for starters.
 
Who would have thought ten years ago a flaming gay guy would be one of conservatives leading speakers? My dad, who routinely listens to and worships michael savage and believes obama is an actual muslim from kenya has milos book pre-ordered now. That's how fucking stupid liberals are. They've made milo ten times stronger.

We live in a new day. Now being a conservative is to be radical, rebellious. The image of stuffy old parents wearing mr. rogers sweaters with an idealistic yet dopey liberal child has been replaced by stuffy old clinton supporters who have children rocking MAGA hats.

Again some of you keep falling for the propaganda and fake news about how milo is a "hatespeecher" .. no he isn't. He isn't anymore out of line than say someone like... ann coulter or michelle malkin. Maybe a bit incendiary but by far not outside of the realm of normal opinion.
Any conservative who takes Milo seriously is as stupid as any liberal moonbat who takes him seriously. Milo is a comedian who trolls people to get a response and he does so in a way I find both witty and charming and funny but he's just as capable of turning that wit on wingnut conservatives as he does moonbat liberals. If you listen to Milo carefully he's no conservative. He's like the opposite of me when with my vicious attacks on the far right. The fact that he viciously attacks the far left doesn't make him a proxy conservative. It means he's taking a critical point of view that has some legitimate points. Now, when Milo calls a true expert on national intelligence stupid and that expert responds that someone who thinks Saudi's are a greater threat to this nation than Russian intelligence is a naïve fool, well I'm giving the intelligence expert the benefit of the doubt. Now when Milo laughs when he gets owned like that well only an idiot would believe he's not trolling.

Milo is an entertainer. Hell he laughed harder than I did when Malcolm Nance asked him on the controversy over Russian intelligence interfering with the U.S. election, which Milo was dismissive about, "Are you a U.S. Citizen?" to which Milo said "No" and Nance aptly replied "Well then go fuck yourself.". The fact that everyone laughed, including Milo, tells you all the truth you need to know about his being a troll.

In all I like Milo...he's a snarky little Castro Street snob who is well read, quite witty and knows how to push peoples button. My gay brother had quite a few snarky little twink buddies who were a lot like Milo. Witty and offensive at the same time but not people you take seriously.
 
depends how you define nationalism. A lot of people believe looking out for America first is nationalist. I don't believe we are genetically superior, I believe our constitution is superior. To me looking out for ones own countries interest above all others seems perfectly natural and normal. Why should I give a shit about some 3rd world shithole? I dont even care about the american poor.
Oh bullshit Grind. What kind of weak milksop argument is that? Nationalism is defined as an extreme form of patriotism especially marked by a feeling of superiority over other nations. Words have specific meaning and definitions and are not some malleable object to rationalize your point of view.
 
Back
Top