Fears of a ‘Deep State’ in America

Ralph said:
This simply demonstrates just what state the Democrat Party finds itself today....its chaos, they have attempted everything short of treason to stop this administration from destroying their 'enchanted' image of the Marxist known as Barry Soetoro.....now, they have even engaged in acts of treason. It will take decades for the democrats to regain the respect of THE PEOPLE...those they have forgotten they actually work for....if The People ever forgive them the democrats will have to purge from their ranks the known communists residing in their midst. Untill such time as they realize that fact...look for them to continue to lose any resemblance of political power. I predict the 2018 midterms will be another GOP blowout....giving the GOP a super majority.

:)
Click to expand...
we think it's a conspiracy by toady IC leadership like Clapper who has no problem lying directly to Congress.
But I want to stay focused on what we know - the IC is a sieve routinely partnering with their leftist friends in the press.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
So long as we have a President and other officials that go on TV and tell us things that are easily proven false and obviously false, then we will need leaks. His word is worthless.
Click to expand...
Can you name one president since WW2 that hasn't lied? I am thinking about lies like the Gulf of Tonkin, Bay of Pigs, Watergate and Cigargate!!
 
anatta said:
oh for lord's sake..and if you are going to post about your thought process ( the juxtaposition) you need to declare what those thought processes are.
Click to expand...


Too big of a word for you? The juxtaposition was yours and the PiMPles. I only pointed it out.
 
Rune said:
No you fucking idiot.
We are talking about a bumbling foolish megalomaniac who singlehandedly moved the doomsday clock ahead.

Flabergastingly foolish junkie
Click to expand...
ROFL..did you see what the Doomesday clock was about?
It was about rolling back green policies.

Seeking an accommodation with Putin in hopes of a detente with Russia is diffusing tensions.
Good lord..unraveling the Cold War 2.0 left over by Obama,and espoused by Hillary is hardly "advancing the clock"
 
anatta said:
Gawddamned you have no ability to prioritize. information just runs around your brain without an ability to conceptualize the context.

How far into SYSTEMATIC CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR was the investigation by the time Deep Throat
was involved?
You had a criminal in the White House supported by criminal aides etc..
we are talking about normal Deep State leaks because they are butt hurt, or oppose policy-
and are using their position of influence to undermine in an illegitimate manner.

Put down the bhong for once before you attempt cognition.
Click to expand...

You are an idiot.
The investigation was over and Nixon was not only cleared but also re-elected by the time Deep throat surfaced.
 
Yaya said:
Wow, an addict making fun of another addict. You're a twisted asshole. I bet you still drink, you were drunk when you made up that claim of having a patent pending.
Click to expand...
You know, Yurt use to do this, I'm starting to agree with the board assessment of you.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
?????....oh I get it......you're going to pretend the comment isn't about the I-community......I don't think that dodge is actually going to work.......no one here besides you will fall for it......
Click to expand...

It was about, what annata claims he/she would have done if he/she were Snowden. Follow the context of the discussion or keep your stupid mouth shut!

AFAIK, Snowden had no legal power to brief any oversight committee. I don't see any reason to believe that these leakers are free to tell these things to congress, as you suggested.
 
Rune said:
You are an idiot.
The investigation was over and Nixon was not only cleared but also re-elected by the time Deep throat surfaced.
Click to expand...
what "investigation" ? Woodward and Bernstein were still active..they were doing investigative reporting.
They weren't just coughing up classified docs/testimony from the IC - which is illegal because of policy differences

They were investigating a criminal enterprise run by POTUS.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
It was about, what annata claims he/she would have done if he/she were Snowden. Follow the context of the discussion or keep your stupid mouth shut!

AFAIK, Snowden had no legal power to brief any oversight committee. I don't see any reason to believe that these leakers are free to tell these things to congress, as you suggested.
Click to expand...

ummm.....I made the comment, not annata......I'm pretty sure I know what the comment was about......I also know that every post you make here is about diverting the discussion.........meanwhile, in a thread started to discuss the I-community I repeat, they could have given their info to their oversight committee instead of the NYT......care to respond this time?.....
 
anatta said:
Gawddamned you have no ability to prioritize. information just runs around your brain without an ability to conceptualize the context.

How far into SYSTEMATIC CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR was the investigation by the time Deep Throat
was involved?
You had a criminal in the White House supported by criminal aides etc..
we are talking about normal Deep State leaks because they are butt hurt, or oppose policy-
and are using their position of influence to undermine in an illegitimate manner.

Put down the bhong for once before you attempt cognition.
Click to expand...
He was an alcoholic for many years and has given that up for pharmaceuticals instead. Half baked cover all the bases when describing him.
Rune said:
It was your context I replied to.
I took a course called Reading Comprehension 101.
You should have too.
Click to expand...

Yaya said:
Funny how liberals support leaks now.

LOL
Click to expand...


Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
anatta said:
Your laziness of composition is your problem,not my vocabulary.
Click to expand...


No, you think your problem (with memory and keeping context) is mine to solve.

Dick from the Internet said:
You and the PiMPle juxtaposed the privacy concerns of private citizens against those of government agents and argued that the privacy of the government agents is more important.
Click to expand...

What in this composition lead you to believe that I was the one doing the juxtaposing? How can I possibly make my meaning clearer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top