Private server v. Public restaurant...?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I don't think there is any doubt about this:
The level of hypocrisy we're going to see over the next 4 years is going to be an epic thing. It will be colossal. It will completely redefine hypocrisy as we know it.
The level of hypocrisy we're going to see over the next 4 years is going to be an epic thing. It will be colossal. It will completely redefine hypocrisy as we know it.
Other than fake news, unfounded accusations, and innuendo, what proof is there of what Abe and Trump discussed at the dinner table and what proof is there that they were
discussing "emergency" foreign policy that was overheard by anyone other than themselves ?
It was right after NK launched their missile and the National Security team then surrounded the table in a throng of unscheduled activity..... You can believe what you want.
Trump's "Home" in Florida is an open club with a restaurant where they were eating. I was there just three weeks ago myself.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol....wedding.......guess that means Trump and the PM were reading the wedding invitations.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol....you've already surpassed all previous standards......
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Well we are certainly not going to believe what you want.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Fine, it's not a public restaurant. The dinner was a private affair with invited guests to his home.
Nope, not invited... Members of the club and there guests were at the Restaurant. Not invited guests.
J #1
You make a painfully sharp point.
"What's this guy talking about???" S #5
It's called U.S. national security. Perhaps you may learn of it some day.
But in addition, it's the tenacious double-standard the Republicans apply.
Republicans squealed like stuck pigs about Secretary Clinton's (D-NY) e-mail server.
But when President Trump ("R"-NY) perpetrates a security violation that's as bad or worse, porsine chorus becomes as placid as a sleeping butterfly.
You make a painfully sharp point.
"What's this guy talking about???" S #5
It's called U.S. national security. Perhaps you may learn of it some day.
But in addition, it's the tenacious double-standard the Republicans apply.
Republicans squealed like stuck pigs about Secretary Clinton's (D-NY) e-mail server.
But when President Trump ("R"-NY) perpetrates a security violation that's as bad or worse, porsine chorus becomes as placid as a sleeping butterfly.
They had their phones pointed at the documents, moron.
So the National Security team surrounded the table. IF thats true, .....whats your point?
Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
"Nope, not invited... Members of the club and there guests were at the Restaurant. Not invited guests." J
"Exactly, they weren't just walking in off the street." S #15
Squabble about it all you like.
What I've read about it indicates there is NO PLACE in that environment suited to introducing classified information.
The reports I've seen of it indicate, if classified information was divulged, that by itself, in that location, was a violation.
"Nope, not invited... Members of the club and there guests were at the Restaurant. Not invited guests." J
"Exactly, they weren't just walking in off the street." S #15
Squabble about it all you like.
What I've read about it indicates there is NO PLACE in that environment suited to introducing classified information.
The reports I've seen of it indicate, if classified information was divulged, that by itself, in that location, was a violation.
The thing that shocked me was the paying guests taking pictures with the "football" carrier. I don't recall that ever being done before. It is just incredible to me. This group seems more careless than Clinton.
There were guests there with their cell phones, any discussion of classified material could be compromised.