Super-racist South Africa says it will take property fr whites and give to blacks.

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Blacks cannot build a modern civilized country. In fact they can't even maintain one they steal from whites as happened in Zimbabwe and now South Africa. Everywhere blacks are in charge, you have poverty and misery and crime. South Africa is the rape and murder capitol of the world and it's economy is now collapsing.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...-redistribute-white-owned-land-and-businesses

feb 12 2017 In a stark flashback to the events that led to Zimbabwe's terminal collapse into banana republic status, as well as unleashing hyperinflation and economic devastation, on Thursday South African President Jacob Zuma pledged to break up white ownership of business and land to reduce inequality, in a State of the Nation address which as the WSJ reports was disrupted by a fistfight, walkouts and a release of pepper spray in the parliamentary chamber. It appears South Africa is not fond of implementing "Rule 19."

To appease the rising populist anger, and taking a page out of developed economies around the globe, Zuma then said that “today we are starting a new chapter of radical socioeconomic transformation., The president added that 22 years after the end of apartheid “white households earn at least five times more than black households.”
Click to expand...
 
All the whites in africa should ask to come here and trump should let them in. These are skilled working people who will not go on welfare like all the millions of illegals obozo invited in.
 
I've had two close friends that lived in S Africa. One Irish, one German.
Both went back to their respective countries and had almost identical opinions - the country has become almost unlivable .
And yes, yaya , The country definitely belongs to blacks.
 
aloysious said:
I've had two close friends that lived in S Africa. One Irish, one German.
Both went back to their respective countries and had almost identical opinions - the country has become almost unlivable .
And yes, yaya , The country definitely belongs to blacks.
Click to expand...

I'm always puzzled the by the belonged to them first rationale. Even among the Native Americans, land was won by war. They just lost to a stronger war machine, right?
 
Yaya said:
I'm always puzzled the by the belonged to them first rationale. Even among the Native Americans, land was won by war. They just lost to a stronger war machine, right?
Click to expand...
The Afrikaners have been there since the 1650s, longer than the USA has even been a country. The Western Cape was very lightly populated by nomadic tribes like the Khoisan.

As for Jacob Zuma, the man is a first class bastard who is very rapidly turning into yet another despot. Fortunately the rule of law, thanks to the British, is still strong there so I very much doubt that he'll be able to repeat what that other corrupt bastard Mugabe did to Zimbabwe.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Yaya said:
I haven't read many of your posts, so I will give some slack. I have no idea what you mean by the above post. Do you mean to say that only Republicans have perfect logic?
Click to expand...

Thanks for your special dispensation in this instance.
 
Yaya said:
I'm always puzzled the by the belonged to them first rationale. Even among the Native Americans, land was won by war. They just lost to a stronger war machine, right?
Click to expand...

its simple. When you cant win by fighting with swords you try winning by fighting with tears. You hope that the people who won that land from you are weak enough to give it back. Its the same with the palestinians too.
 
If it was 1988, and white South Africans were taking from black South Africans, TDAK wouldn't give a fuck.

Sent from my Windows Phone at 81 MPH
 
Yaya said:
No one will touch this, so I will.

Doesn't the land belonged to black South Africans?

:corn:
Click to expand...

You can argue the land belongs to blacks but not the businesses and that's what matters. Whites turned that country into a first world nation and then blacks took it from them and drove the country into the ground. It's what always happens. THINK
 
Pablo Martinez said:
If it was 1988, and white South Africans were taking from black South Africans, TDAK wouldn't give a fuck.
Click to expand...

What was there to take from blacks? Blacks don't produce anything. If the whites had never settled in South Africa the country would still be in the stone age. Which is where it is once again heading.
 
Can any of you white-hating libs explain why africa is the poorest and most backward continent on the planet? There used to be two exceptions. When Zimbabwe was white-run and called Rhodesia it was first world. So was South Africa. Now zim is a sewer and SA is joining it. Why is it black control always leads to crime and poverty and misery.?
 
They've been doing this for quite some time but it is cyclical. They seize it, run it into the ground, get the owners to come back and make it work again then out.
Even worse in Zimbabwe
 
Well, you have to ask how the 'whites' got any property in South Africa in the first place, don't you? Angels brought it, I expect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top