What La La Land & the Superbowl reveal about the far left

CFM,

How does an idiot like you feel about Trump's desire to expand slander and libel laws to a point where they would represent a clear violation of free speech?


Define clear violation. That's the problem with people like you. You claim things are what you say they are then demand others accept what you say.
 
Define clear violation. That's the problem with people like you. You claim things are what you say they are then demand others accept what you say.


You said the existing libel laws violated free speech. Now you say expanding them won't? How is that?

Projection. You are too afraid too even make an argument for why one may move to Florida from NY but not from Cuba to Florida. You just restate your assertions without any support.
 
I don't care how you take it. Unless you know it's true, you shouldn't have a problem with it.


You are pretty slow.

It's true and I don't have a problem with that. I have a problem with you thinking I would take it as an insult, you racist pos.
 
You said the existing libel laws violated free speech. Now you say expanding them won't? How is that?

Projection. You are too afraid too even make an argument for why one may move to Florida from NY but not from Cuba to Florida. You just restate your assertions without any support.

Define clear violation or are you afraid to do so?


I answered it NL. Not my fault you have the 85 IQ and mental capacity of the average black person. If you don't know the difference between WITHIN and from OUTSIDE, I can't help you understand. I've made the argument. You don't agree.

I asked you a question. Are you the typical pussy afraid to answer it. You called it a "poison well". That's translates is you are scared to answer. That's OK. Most like you are.
 
Define clear violation or are you afraid to do so?


I answered it NL. Not my fault you have the 85 IQ and mental capacity of the average black person. If you don't know the difference between WITHIN and from OUTSIDE, I can't help you understand. I've made the argument. You don't agree.

I asked you a question. Are you the typical pussy afraid to answer it. You called it a "poison well". That's translates is you are scared to answer. That's OK. Most like you are.

You did not answer, coward, you just reasserted your position as you have here. I know the difference. I am asking you to explain how that affects the issue of individual rights.

The poisoned well question was "are you one of those open border dipshits" dipshit. I answered that one anyway and you are too much the coward to answer my sincere question. That's not going to continue. If you can't come out of the fetal position and engage then we are done.
 
You did not answer, coward, you just reasserted your position as you have here. I know the difference. I am asking you to explain how that affects the issue of individual rights.

The poisoned well question was "are you one of those open border dipshits" dipshit. I answered that one anyway and you are too much the coward to answer my sincere question. That's not going to continue. If you can't come out of the fetal position and engage then we are done.

Someone in Cuba doesn't have the right to come to this country unless the laws of this country allow it and give them permission. They weren't born with the right to go come here simply because they were born. Because you don't like that they can't doesn't mean they have a right to do it.

Didn't think you would answer my question directly. You have by stating you believe a foreigner without permission has the right to come to this country. I bet you think the illegals should be allowed to stay.

Continue to be a NL and lower yourself. You said it's true.
 
Someone in Cuba doesn't have the right to come to this country unless the laws of this country allow it and give them permission.


So then, as I stated early on, you are arguing that rights are nothing but government permission.


They weren't born with the right to go come here simply because they were born. Because you don't like that they can't doesn't mean they have a right to do it.

So you reject the Declaration of Independence.

Didn't think you would answer my question directly. You have by stating you believe a foreigner without permission has the right to come to this country. I bet you think the illegals should be allowed to stay.


Since you have admitted defeat on that point we can now move on.


Expanding libel/slander laws, as Trump would have us do, to make it so that journalist and publishers of truthful criticism are subject to legal harassment chills speech.



http://www.npr.org/sections/paralle...ibel-and-the-law-u-s-and-u-k-go-separate-ways
 
It goes both ways. Trump supporters identify and condemn equally things that are seen as "anti-Trump," such as Nordstrom or the SAG Awards. That isn't necessarily an apples-to-apples, but in terms of maintaining & fostering division in the country, it's just as prominent.
.
lol.....so noticing divisiveness is divisive?.......we also notice your ignorance.....that certainly doesn't make us ignorant........
 
You are asking me to pass judgment on people I don't know based on your incomplete reporting of their social media activities. I am sure some are far left.

Do you think I am suggesting that anybody that rooted for the Falcons is far left? Probably not, so then why would you assume that I was suggesting that anyone concerned about minorities in film is?

I rooted for the Falcons because the Patriots are cheaters and I usually pull for the NFC South teams which I know better (I did pull for the Broncos because of Manning over the Panthers). You can't take that one position and declare me far left based upon it anymore than I can make statements about black people in your facebook feed based on one point.

I was talking more about the fact that there are many in the far left that do not consider anything past identity, just as grind and the rest of the alt-rightpc does.

Wow. You pulled out the BIG GUNS! alt-right pc! You slayed 'em with your cleverness
 
You did not answer, coward, you just reasserted your position as you have here. I know the difference. I am asking you to explain how that affects the issue of individual rights.

The poisoned well question was "are you one of those open border dipshits" dipshit. I answered that one anyway and you are too much the coward to answer my sincere question. That's not going to continue. If you can't come out of the fetal position and engage then we are done.

Good. Now move on.
 
So then, as I stated early on, you are arguing that rights are nothing but government permission.




So you reject the Declaration of Independence.




Since you have admitted defeat on that point we can now move on.


Expanding libel/slander laws, as Trump would have us do, to make it so that journalist and publishers of truthful criticism are subject to legal harassment chills speech.



http://www.npr.org/sections/paralle...ibel-and-the-law-u-s-and-u-k-go-separate-ways

You keep stating thing I haven't said.

You can move on, NL. Or maybe you're just the N part. You tell me.
 
Back
Top