Trump is limited... Good news.

Jarod said:
Trumps Tweet, (comma splice not withstanding) was good news for those of us who feared he would not follow the rule of law.

Many of Trumps comments and personality traits led me to believe he was a tyrant who knew no bounds. He acts like he does not care about anything or anyone who disagrees with him and will not respect any such limits on him actions.

However his Tweet last night was good news.

"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!"

That seemingly defiant tweet is a subtle acknowledgement of the rule of law and authority of the Court. Trump could have said, "The security of our nation is at stake" and then instructed his departments to enforce the ban anyway. We would be facing Constitutional crisis and a Coup D'etat, as I have previously mentioned in other threads.

In that one Tweet, grammar aside, Trump recognized and reaffirmed the authority of the Court even when the Nations security is at stake. I dont know if that was his intention, but even so, I am happy with the result.
Click to expand...

As many times as Shlump has been in court getting sued, it's hard to imagine that even a moron like him would be totally ignorant and blind to the authority of the judiciary.
 
Ralph said:
The 9th? Its a simple cure.....simply execute another EO in detail that cannot be subjected to left wing rhetorical bull shit. Draft the EO in such a manner that it details the rule of law detailing the fact that Immigration falls under executive authority....detail the number of murders around the globe committed by ISLAM, and point to the fact that all acts of Islamic terrorism that is detailed in the EO are all 100% MUSLIM in nature. Game over. Its oxymoronic to suggest that you can target Islamic terrorism without limiting MUSLIM immigration. In the meanwhile concentrate on appointing another constitutional advocate to SCOTUS.

This latest act of left wing luancy was not unexpected by anyone that has witnessed the 9th in action before. The dog and phony was unnecessary...the ruling was predetermined, it was just a necessary step.
Click to expand...

I agree it is a simple cure, why wont he do it...? If the nation is in danger and he has a simple cure, what gives?
 
NOVA said:
LOST 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions

Ouch....thats gotta hurt .....

and pinhead zippy can't admit its true.....and gobbles up the convoluted spin on politifact whose only lame defense is harping on the reason for losing....

grasping at straws.....; the so called fact checkers are nothing by spin sites apologizing for liberals with lame ass word games......

LOST 44 cases in the SC ( by unanimous decisions ?) is just the plain facts of the matter....

who gives a shit why he lost, it won't change the fact that he lost...
Click to expand...

Zappa/Politifact - provides corroboration to back up their conclusion.

Nova/Yo Yo - make their claim, refuse to corroborate it and then spew invective when cornered by the actual truth.

Gee, I wonder who people will believe?

:rofl2:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
But Trump isn't trying to block all Muslims from coming into Norway or Sweden.

This discussion is about Trump trying to block all Muslims from entering America.

And, as Rune correctly points out, there hasn't been a single American death at the hands of a refugee.

But nice try at confusing the issue yet again...a pity you just can't seem to stay on topic.
Click to expand...
Do you ever stop lying? The EO does not block all Muslims.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I posted the ENTIRE ARTICLE along with the link so others could read it at their leisure, but according to Yo Yo, I left out the truth.

Yo Yo, when responding to my comment, LEFT OUT SIGNIFICANT portions of relevant comments, but I left out the truth.

Poor lying Yo Yo.
Click to expand...
Another lie. You posted PART of the article and gave link.

You're worse than Trump.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Zappa/Politifact - provides corroboration to back up their conclusion.

Nova/Yo Yo - make their claim, refuse to corroborate it and then spew invective when cornered by the actual truth.

Gee, I wonder who people will believe?

:rofl2:
Click to expand...
Another lie. I used YOUR article to show you that you are wrong.

That is THREE lies in just this thread. As Thingy says, you're pathological.
 
Post after post after post from the Yo Yo and not a one of them addressing the issue or corroborating any of his earlier claims about Obama.

Nope...each and every one just another whiny personal attack directed at the guy who embarrassed him.

Grow up Yo Yo.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Zappa/Politifact - provides corroboration to back up their conclusion.

Nova/Yo Yo - make their claim, refuse to corroborate it and then spew invective when cornered by the actual truth.

Gee, I wonder who people will believe?

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

LOST 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions

Ouch....thats gotta hurt .....

and pinhead zippy can't admit its true.....and gobbles up the convoluted spin on politifact whose only lame defense is harping on the reason for losing....


So where did I go wrong ?....I'll understand if all you've got is politifact....don't bother posting their link....their bullshit is irrelevant.
 
NOVA said:
LOST 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions

Ouch....thats gotta hurt .....

and pinhead zippy can't admit its true.....and gobbles up the convoluted spin on politifact whose only lame defense is harping on the reason for losing....


So where did I go wrong ?....I'll understand if all you've got is politifact....don't bother posting their link....their bullshit is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

ROFL!!

Politifact may not be the most trusted source, but it's miles ahead of the "corroboration" you provided.

Oh wait...you provided NOTHING to back up your bullshit.

My mistake!

:rofl2:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
ROFL!!

Politifact may not be the most trusted source, but it's miles ahead of the "corroboration" you provided.

Oh wait...you provided NOTHING to back up your bullshit.

My mistake!

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Do your own research, pinhead.....you'll get more corroboration than you can imagine...

poor zippy....
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Post after post after post from the Yo Yo and not a one of them addressing the issue or corroborating any of his earlier claims about Obama.

Nope...each and every one just another whiny personal attack directed at the guy who embarrassed him.

Grow up Yo Yo.
Click to expand...
You made a specific claim, and of course when I proved you lied, you run away from your claim and attack me.

My earlier claims are EXACTLY the type of claims you always make and never back up and of course you have a problem when others do it, but not when you do it.

You got totally busted lying.

You LOSE.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
But Trump isn't trying to block all Muslims from coming into Norway or Sweden.

This discussion is about Trump trying to block all Muslims from entering America.

And, as Rune correctly points out, there hasn't been a single American death at the hands of a refugee.

But nice try at confusing the issue yet again...a pity you just can't seem to stay on topic.
Click to expand...

If you're discussing something about Trump trying to block ALL Muslims coming into the country, you're discussing something that doesn't exist.

There are far more than 7 countries with more than 90% Muslim populations. If he was trying to block Muslims, as the left claims, why didn't the ban apply to all those countries?

WHEN, not if, one of the so called nice refugees does something, it's on you guys. The only think I can hope for is WHEN it happens it you or your family that feels the affects of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top