We am still waiting foe a left winger to tell us why we need more Muslim refugees or

Your white liberal, gated community doesn't allow the homeless (or Blacks).

I don't live in one of those.

My neighborhood is working class and diverse.

Now go ahead and shove Shlump's junk back in your mouth. Nothing you say is worth hearing anyway.
 
immigrants..............................Seriously, if you want more of these people here, you must know why, right?

Or do you just babble along incoherently with the group, believing that the other person knows.

Why do you want more unemployed immigrants, of which some will get jobs, that automatically delete a job for an American..............

Please explain this logic
good lord are you deaf, blind and stupid? How many times do you need to be told?

We need foreign immigrants of all stripes from all over the globe so that we can transplant them to trailer parks like yours so that the can start marrying your sons and daughters so that we stop producing these endless hordes of half witted inbred genetic defective red necks that have been a lead anchor around this nations neck for too many generations now.
 
This country has zero need to apologize to anyone over immigration.

Thanks for your input though.
bingo.. I'm sorry but the days of open borders, catch and release ( what a farce that was) and following UN mandates of 100k Syrian refugees alone are gone.
If it serves the purpose of the USA -they get in -if not they don't. which is how almost all the world does immigration-
except European Union,and we see what a mess millions of refugees cause
 
This is just an interregnum. Trump will be impeached when America takes back power from the fascists in 2018. His name will be wiped from the history books and we will all look back on this period as a time of great national shame.
 
bingo.. I'm sorry but the days of open borders, catch and release ( what a farce that was) and following UN mandates of 100k Syrian refugees alone are gone.
If it serves the purpose of the USA -they get in -if not they don't. which is how almost all the world does immigration-
except European Union,and we see what a mess millions of refugees cause

Obama started letting in a lot of Syrian refugees because

1.) The vetting process takes about two years
2.) The Syrian Civil War started two years ago

Syria was suddenly producing most of the refugees in the world, so obviously our refugee policy would take them into account. It's not some UN mandate like you pulled out of your ass here. Now they have a special exclusion from refugee status, they were previously being treated just like any other refugee, now one man's endless bigotry has shut that down and is leaving children to blow up.
 
Stupid Nazi's. When the American people take back power from this illegitimate unelected fascist, there will be a reckoning like none ever seen before. We will make 1945 look like community service.
 
So what is Wales doing? ... a total of 112? :rofl2:

Syrian refugee resettlement in Wales 'painfully slow' - BBC News
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-37186114
Aug 25, 2016 - A further 34 Syrian refugees are resettled in Wales, bringing the total to 112 - but a charity criticises the speed of the process.


Syrian refugee numbers in Wales 'disappointing' - BBC News

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-36444884 Jun 5, 2016 - Only five local authorities in Wales have rehoused Syrian refugees, despite all 22 pledging to do so. Home Office figures show Wales resettled ...
They don't want to go there, it's too poor and full of whining Welshmen.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
bingo.. I'm sorry but the days of open borders, catch and release ( what a farce that was) and following UN mandates of 100k Syrian refugees alone are gone.
If it serves the purpose of the USA -they get in -if not they don't. which is how almost all the world does immigration-
except European Union,and we see what a mess millions of refugees cause

Fake_Buddha_Quote.jpg


Fake Buddhists are funny!!!!
 
Obama started letting in a lot of Syrian refugees because

1.) The vetting process takes about two years
2.) The Syrian Civil War started two years ago

Syria was suddenly producing most of the refugees in the world, so obviously our refugee policy would take them into account. It's not some UN mandate like you pulled out of your ass here. Now they have a special exclusion from refugee status, they were previously being treated just like any other refugee, now one man's endless bigotry has shut that down and is leaving children to blow up.

I sort of get why Obama would do that given his outstanding role in the implosion of Libya. But Obama is gone along with the middle name in my screen name---as promised lol. Tis the season to keep promises.

We/you have a new president now. He actually puts the safety of tax payers ahead of the plight of refugees. What a novel idea.

I've noticed a facile attempt by the left and the media [nearly a redundancy] to couch their objection to Trump's EO in moral terms. As if public policy should be based on morality. I thought that was a big no-no.

But let's go with it. How 'moral' is it to help Syrian refugees when so many of our veterans can't even get adequate healthcare---after putting their lives on the line so lefties are free to have pussy rebellions or burn flags in the streets? How about the poor buggers in Flint Michigan who need clean water? How 'moral' is it to put the Syrian refugees ahead of their concerns?

Maybe someone can explain that to me.
 
Bad news, Toby. Your fellow Americans elected that fascist. Deal with it.

Americans are notoriously fickle.

Just because a handful of malcontents up in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania threw a temper tantrum and handed Shlump the election with a lot of help from Comey, does not mean he has the backing of the people.

But their mood can very easily swing back in the opposite direction on a dime and hand Shlump a Democrat Senate to deal with in '18 then undo their massive fuckup in '20.
 
I don't live in one of those.

My neighborhood is working class and diverse.

Now go ahead and shove Shlump's junk back in your mouth. Nothing you say is worth hearing anyway.

Yeah right ... just like you donate all your profits to the poor because profit is evil, you Prius driving liberal elitist.
 
Yeah right ... just like you give all your profits to the poor because profit is evil.

1c4uye.jpg


Profit is not evil.

Squeezing out every last nickle of profit at the expense of working people is.

People who aren't evil right-wing jerks understand the difference without having to have it explained to them.
 
Obama started letting in a lot of Syrian refugees because

1.) The vetting process takes about two years
2.) The Syrian Civil War started two years ago

Syria was suddenly producing most of the refugees in the world, so obviously our refugee policy would take them into account. It's not some UN mandate like you pulled out of your ass here. Now they have a special exclusion from refugee status, they were previously being treated just like any other refugee, now one man's endless bigotry has shut that down and is leaving children to blow up.
I've read the so called vetting process. It does take about 2 years,and Obama's refugess flow of maybe 10k a year could have been handled if it was expeditious vetting.

I remind you Hillary -wanted to follow the UN prescription. 65k this year and 100k ( or more ) next year.

Now you tell me how a process that might have been able to handle 10k in 2 year - your words that I can agree too- can suddenly process 6-10x more in the same time period??

It would be impossible, and the vetting standards would have had to be significantly reduced..

What is happening instead is a thorough re-evaluation of the process-clearly Trump does not trust anything much about Obama's refugee process, and Clinton and the UN's advocation of exponentially more is a main reason

PS the Syrian Civil war is much more then 2 years ago -it all started around 2011
 
Americans are notoriously fickle.

Just because a handful of malcontents up in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania threw a temper tantrum and handed Shlump the election with a lot of help from Comey, does not mean he has the backing of the people.

But their mood can very easily swing back in the opposite direction on a dime and hand Shlump a Democrat Senate to deal with in '18 then undo their massive fuckup in '20.
Yes, and Trump has no path to 270.

Your predictions are good to bet on the opposite happening.
 
Yes, and Trump has no path to 270.

Your predictions are good to bet on the opposite happening.

I never claimed that.

I always accepted and feared the fact that Trump could defy expectations and pull off a win.

I never underestimate anyone.
 
Back
Top