59% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance.

Yaya said:
No way Trump wins, let alone runs, for two terms.

I bet you 1000 Won.
Click to expand...

lay me odds and I will consider. I dont like locking up money for 4 years though. But maybe we can work something out. I'll be taking a lot of bets prob around 2018
 
OldMercsRule said:
The djia is another indicator of his near term job performance.

He really does appear to have massive reserves of energy and he is doing things many Americans want done even if the hard Left media keeps slaming him for what he says.

He does (in all fairness) give the media lots of ammunition.

He doesn't seem to be idological at all, and his massive issue to the Left is his lack of PC, and the fact that moon bats are bat shit crazy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, many times I wish he would just STFU. I am willing to tolerate it to a certain degree, but it pisses me off at times.

Hard nut to swallow for these Dems. They're hyperventilating 24/7!
 
blackascoal said:
I want him to FAIL no matter what.

Think republicans and Obama .. that's where I am.
Click to expand...

That sentiment is sad: Black Coal Feller, butt: not surprising from an anti-American Marxist such as yersef.

I don't think I've ever read a post of yers that said something positive about this great Republic.

BTW, Public Policy Polling isn't even worth using as toilet paper... burp...



"Is Public Policy Polling a Reliable Source? No.

December 23, 2015

By MATTHIAS SHAPIRO

If you're on the phone with Public Policy Polling, just hang up.
Because you deserve better than to have your time wasted by a polling firm that crowd-sources polling questions on Twitter from biased activists and has demonstrated little commitment to honest data."


http://theparadoxproject.org/blog-1/2015/12/21/is-public-policy-polling-a-reliable-source-no

"Nov 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM

Here’s Proof Some Pollsters Are Putting A Thumb On The Scale

By Nate Silver

...A few pollsters are shameless about their herding. One of them is Public Policy Polling (PPP), a polling firm that conducts automated polls for both public consumption and for liberal and Democratic clients..."

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/heres-proof-some-pollsters-are-putting-a-thumb-on-the-scale/
 
damn nate silver literally called out PPP as bullshit. Interesting.

I wont play too much of the "who is more biased" game but even PPP's methodology said it was polling registered voters, as opposed to likely voters. As I have said for more than a decade, registered voter polls skew massively liberal, lots of liberals are registered to vote in america but never do so, especially for mid terms. Many of the lever pullers simply can't get time off from work. You know who consistently turns out? Old white people. How do you think they skew?

What matters for actually predicting outcomes is likely voters and of course rasmussen polled likely voters in their survey. Although they do usually still have a conservative leaning bias. You can prob take a few points off the rasmussen.
 
So, good polls = legit, and bad polls = the polls are never right! When will you libs get tired of being wrong!

It's been a thoroughly disgusting week. Basically exactly as I expected - not just for Trump, but for his many sycophants. I'll pray for all of you.
 
Thing1 said:
So, good polls = legit, and bad polls = the polls are never right! When will you libs get tired of being wrong!

It's been a thoroughly disgusting week. Basically exactly as I expected - not just for Trump, but for his many sycophants. I'll pray for all of you.
Click to expand...

if this is how simple your mind works no wonder you were completely clueless as to the last election. I just explained the differences in methodology and why they matter for their ability to reflect reality. polls of likely voters are always going to matter more when it comes to predicting outcomes, for obvious reasons.
 
+ said:
if this is how simple your mind works no wonder you were completely clueless as to the last election. I just explained the differences in methodology and why they matter for their ability to reflect reality. polls of likely voters are always going to matter more when it comes to predicting outcomes, for obvious reasons.
Click to expand...

That's apples/oranges. Either polls are valid or they are not. It's not all about "predicting outcomes." Favorability ratings are used for much more than the next election.

Enough. Don't twist everything to your incredibly narrow point of view.
 
Thing1 said:
That's apples/oranges. Either polls are valid or they are not. It's not all about "predicting outcomes." Favorability ratings are used for much more than the next election.

Enough. Don't twist everything to your incredibly narrow point of view.
Click to expand...

um.

1) some polls can be closer to the truth than others. This should be very obvious. Methodology is usually going to be a huge factor. Sample size is another. Etc

2) there are people already talking about midterms and 2020 on this site. A poll about likely VOTERS is much more relevant in discussing potential outcomes vs. those that don't actually intend to affect a certain outcome.

This post of yours is almost insulting in how fucking dumb it is. Nothing is being twisted.
 
Midas Whale67 said:
Yeah, many times I wish he would just STFU. I am willing to tolerate it to a certain degree, but it pisses me off at times.

Hard nut to swallow for these Dems. They're hyperventilating 24/7!
Click to expand...

Let them huff and puff until they pass out... then the adults can have a reasoned conversation.

-
 
most other polls of are "americans" which doesn't describe the electoral landscape. also as we have seen from this election most polls fail to find the silent trump voter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top