Infrastructure spending is a human rights issue?

cawacko

Well-known member
Can someone explain this one to me from California's newest Senator?


Kamala Harris ‏@KamalaHarris 41m
41 minutes ago


Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.
 
Can someone explain this one to me from California's newest Senator?


Kamala Harris ‏@KamalaHarris 41m
41 minutes ago


Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.
I'm thinking of communities like Flint.
 
Can someone explain this one to me from California's newest Senator?


Kamala Harris ‏@KamalaHarris 41m
41 minutes ago


Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.

I guess if you count failing bridges, tunnels, rail, dams, etc., as hazardous to human life, then you could make such a statement.
 
Can someone explain this one to me from California's newest Senator?


Kamala Harris ‏@KamalaHarris 41m
41 minutes ago


Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.

She's trying to reference environmental justice without actually using those words. Water as a human right...stuff like that.
 
Can someone explain this one to me from California's newest Senator?


Kamala Harris ‏@KamalaHarris 41m
41 minutes ago


Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.
Hmmm go spend a week in Hoxie, AR then come talk.
 
Can someone explain this one to me from California's newest Senator?


Kamala Harris ‏@KamalaHarris 41m
41 minutes ago


Here's the truth: infrastructure spending isn't a transportation issue for most Americans — it's a human rights issue.

You can't explain stupid; you point at it and laugh.
 
im really hoping flint is one of the first things trump gets done.
I honestly do too but if he gets his trillion dollars without half of it going to tax breaks for the wealthy as what Obama was forced to compromise with Republicans for his Bush recession stimulus package then Republicans congressionals would be hypocrites of a staggering degree.
 
I heard awhile ago it would be some kind of partnership with private companies -like building toll roads.
It's all I heard,and that was in passing, and that some time ago
 
She's trying to reference environmental justice without actually using those words. Water as a human right...stuff like that.

Not even that. In many rural and small town regions in the interior of our nation we have infrastructure haves and have nots. That is an issue I have long argued Democrats need to champion to attract rural and working class voters. Try running a small business these days with limited IT infrastructure, for example. Crumbling roads and other public utilities doesn't help attract capital investments either.
 
I honestly do too but if he gets his trillion dollars without half of it going to tax breaks for the wealthy as what Obama was forced to compromise with Republicans for his Bush recession stimulus package then Republicans congressionals would be hypocrites of a staggering degree.

Nothing dumber than liberals claiming another trillion dollar infrastructure bill will fix everything..... forget the last one that FAILED.

Nothing more moronic than believing government should add another trillion in deficit spending on top of the twenty trillion already on the books.
 
Not even that. In many rural and small town regions in the interior of our nation we have infrastructure haves and have nots. That is an issue I have long argued Democrats need to champion to attract rural and working class voters. Try running a small business these days with limited IT infrastructure, for example. Crumbling roads and other public utilities doesn't help attract capital investments either.

bullshit-meeter.jpg
 
I heard awhile ago it would be some kind of partnership with private companies -like building toll roads.
It's all I heard,and that was in passing, and that some time ago
They just discussed it in congress yesterday and the notion got panned. Mainly on the point of if you plan on private investment on infrastructure what are their property rights in that investment and what happens if they don't step up to the plate?
 
They just discussed it in congress yesterday and the notion got panned. Mainly on the point of if you plan on private investment on infrastructure what are their property rights in that investment and what happens if they don't step up to the plate?
public-private partnerships should be doable by contract law. I would think that might be better for high risk/rewards.
But i'll take anything -the rural infrastructure is a good idea too.
 
Back
Top