PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
can't be true......twins were born to a couple in our church at 21 weeks......they are now seven......
Donald Trump Signs Anti-Abortion Executive Order Surrounded By Men
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
can't be true......twins were born to a couple in our church at 21 weeks......they are now seven......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
and a history of them being illegal in the US except for the health of the mother from the inception of the United States......did RvW take all the way back to the worship of Baal where they used to sacrifice their first born child on the arms of a red hot metal idol?......
thats where you guys missed your chance........you should have claimed it was a religion and we could never have stopped you........
A lie....not in the United States. We are not living in a one world order where the rule of law is borrowed or used as precedent by members of the united nations. Simply supply one law that made the practice legal in the United States from the time this nation became a republic in the 1700s to 1973...in the United States of America. In fact the radical court of 1973 ignored over two hundred and 40 years of established legal precedent where SCOTUS always refused to address any such challenge and proclaimed it a matter of STATE LAW....as all such cases were sent back to the state of origin...until the Court decided to define life outside the scope of Applied Science in 73...while ignoring all previous precedence.
That court essentially AMENDED or CHANGED the United States Constitution void of any Representation from the peoples representatives. They opined and added words that never existed into the Constitution...opining that Abortion was a right of privacy protected via the Constitution. Its simple, if the text of the constitution was never amended by the court....show me the word Abortion in the Constitution.
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
GazzaQueen
Verified User
This blackascoal guy is a little too concerned for a woman's right to murder.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
well, if you had read the entire discussion it was about waiting eight years.......no I am not adopted, but both of my children are
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So what? That's a truly piss poor, or should I say puss poor, argument. DNA was first discovered in 1869 by Frederick Miescher whilst studying leukocytes from pus-ridden bandages. So are you saying that popping a boil is murder as well?
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
If it's OK to destroy an unborn child, then why is it a felony to destroy an Eagle's egg??
im not arguing a fetus is important or sentient life. I just don't like people using doublethink.
There are a lot of people in America now confused about basic biology and they literally think a fetus is "not alive" which is just a retarded thing to believe.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
That's only due to the advances in medicine to keep premature foetuses alive. Medicine is not able to speed up the development of a foetus, so sentience is not possible until the third trimester.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
The_Trump_Effect
Verified User
WASHINGTON ― On Monday, surrounded by other white men, President Donald Trump signed an anti
Should Trump continue to fund Planned Parenthood like the Dems want so that Planned Parenthood can continue to be the main cause of death for African American children? Is this what you want?
Sillypoo
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yes and did you take minority babies or did you go for the white ones like most would be adopters?
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So will you support low cost IUDs and contraceptive implants for the poor?
WASHINGTON ― On Monday, surrounded by other white men, President Donald Trump signed an anti
Should Trump continue to fund Planned Parenthood like the Dems want so that Planned Parenthood can continue to be the main cause of death for African American children? Is this what you want?
Sillypoo
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Midas Whale67
Banned
He's a little too concerned about everything, frankly.
GazzaQueen
Verified User
Silly argument. The boil's DNA belongs to the same person. The baby has it's own unique and individual DNA. It's a different person altogether.
What I find amusing...is the left's idea that the US Constitution is a living breathing document as it can be subject to change. Indeed its a living breathing document that was founded on the principle that it could be amended to accept any position held by THE PEOPLE/STATES who first drafted and ratified this contract between the states and the Federalist Central Government.
If it could not be changed...slavery would still be legal, women still could not vote or own property. But there is only one method where it can be legally amended and its not from the sound of a any civil servant's gavel who has never been elected by the PEOPLE but are political appointees.....There is one of two methods (Article 5, under the provisions established in 1 U.S.C. 106b) it can EVOLVE WITH SOCIETY....by a 3/4 majority ratification from the people/states...or from the same super majority found to exist within a Constitutional Convention.
SCOTUS has no authority to amend or change one word, they are not authorized to add words that don't exist, they are not allowed take away words that do exist and change them to something else...for instance like changing the word 'of' to 'from' in the establishment clause concerning Religion.
If scotus does possess this authority...anyone, show us in the Constitution where a part of the Federalist Central Government can change the contract among the states and the feds...that's just what scotus is....a part of the Federal Government with their only constitutional authority being to REVIEW existing law and compare that law to the literal words found in the Constitution.
Why did slavery exist in this nation? Because the majority of the people in society wanted it to be legal.....that's just how a representative constitutional republic works....it reflects the will of the people. When the people decided to end slavery (with a simple attitude adjustment, much like getting hit on the back of the head with a 2x4...the Civil War)...slavery ended in a legal fashion and the Constitution was amended to reflect that evolution of society.
There is only one method where ABORTION can become totally legal and unchallenged....AMEND THE DAMN CONSTITUTION. If there are enough people....about 3/4 total of the population that agrees...then there you have it...Abortion will be legal and constitutional. But until that time this immoral court decision will always be subject to being changed via the same method it was created...via the sound a judges gavel at the Supreme Level. You live by the sword you die by the sword.
If it could not be changed...slavery would still be legal, women still could not vote or own property. But there is only one method where it can be legally amended and its not from the sound of a any civil servant's gavel who has never been elected by the PEOPLE but are political appointees.....There is one of two methods (Article 5, under the provisions established in 1 U.S.C. 106b) it can EVOLVE WITH SOCIETY....by a 3/4 majority ratification from the people/states...or from the same super majority found to exist within a Constitutional Convention.
SCOTUS has no authority to amend or change one word, they are not authorized to add words that don't exist, they are not allowed take away words that do exist and change them to something else...for instance like changing the word 'of' to 'from' in the establishment clause concerning Religion.
If scotus does possess this authority...anyone, show us in the Constitution where a part of the Federalist Central Government can change the contract among the states and the feds...that's just what scotus is....a part of the Federal Government with their only constitutional authority being to REVIEW existing law and compare that law to the literal words found in the Constitution.
Why did slavery exist in this nation? Because the majority of the people in society wanted it to be legal.....that's just how a representative constitutional republic works....it reflects the will of the people. When the people decided to end slavery (with a simple attitude adjustment, much like getting hit on the back of the head with a 2x4...the Civil War)...slavery ended in a legal fashion and the Constitution was amended to reflect that evolution of society.
There is only one method where ABORTION can become totally legal and unchallenged....AMEND THE DAMN CONSTITUTION. If there are enough people....about 3/4 total of the population that agrees...then there you have it...Abortion will be legal and constitutional. But until that time this immoral court decision will always be subject to being changed via the same method it was created...via the sound a judges gavel at the Supreme Level. You live by the sword you die by the sword.
Last edited:
If it isn't a person, it isn't a homicide, much less infanticide. Prove personhood. Oops. You can't, you won't. You are too irrational. So now explain how a woman cannot remove something that is not a person growing in her body without a bunch of old grizzled white hypocrites permission.
Ps. Poor raped women in he third world lack dimes and healthcare. You have NO moral high ground depriving healthcare including but not limited to reproductive care based upon your religious superstitious irrationality.
If it is not a person, the abortion is moral, legal, and not a subject for your barbaric interloping.
That is awesome. Really is!
GazzaQueen
Verified User
Whatever you want to call it, fetus or embryo or the popular term of the month, it's human. A human fetus, or a human embryo. That's what proves personhood.