Donald Trump Signs Anti-Abortion Executive Order Surrounded By Men

blackascoal said:
If a woman is not charged with murder for an abortion, quite obviously there are distinctions of life.

The Right makes distinctions. They care about unborn life, don't give a damn about that life once it's born.

The right to choose whether that unborn life should be born should be left to the parents .. those responsible for that life once it is born.
Click to expand...

i​ agree
 
+ said:
so your opposition is merely the optics? You'd be perfectly satisfied if they had a token woman for you? I didn't get the impression you were discussing political tactics in your OP
Click to expand...

mediocre negroes and milquetoast women :)
 
There is no good reason that US taxpayer money, to the tune of $607.5 million should be spent on killing children in foreign counties.....
 
i'm sure that some of you will actually have a constitutionally correct answer for this, but if congress is the sole entity for determining what money is spent where and how, what authority does trump have to prohibit it?
 
Perfect FB reply to the Women's march:

All these girls upset about 'my body my choice', but there's a large number of doctors that actually require the wives sign off to give a guy a vasectomy...I'm going to start the men's March "My Balls My Calls"
 
blackascoal said:
58863f342900002800dd1374.jpeg


WASHINGTON ― On Monday, surrounded by other white men, President Donald Trump signed an anti-abortion executive order that has far-reaching consequences for women’s reproductive health access worldwide.

Trump reinstated the Mexico City policy, also known as the global gag rule, which was first put in place by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It prohibits giving U.S. funding to nongovernmental organizations that offer or advise on a wide range of family planning and reproductive health options if they include abortion ― even if U.S. dollars are not specifically used for abortion-related services.

The United States spends about $600 million a year on international assistance for family planning and reproductive health programs, making it possible for 27 million women and couples to access contraceptive services and supplies.

None of that money is spent on performing abortions. The Helms amendment has prevented U.S. tax dollars from funding overseas abortions since 1973. Proponents of the global gag rule believe the policy is nevertheless still necessary, arguing that Helms isn’t strong enough by itself.

The people voted for President Trump in part because he clearly defined his position as always being on the side of protecting life....what did you expect, for him to kiss the asses of the femi-nazi's that support abortion on demand?



The executive order is one of the first Trump has signed since taking office. Sitting in the Oval Office Monday, he also signed ones freezing federal hiring and withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

A pan of the people standing by his side showed that there were few, if any, women present.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-abortion-men_us_5886369be4b0e3a7356a7910

So two days after millions of women around th world marched against Trump, he gives them reason for their efforts.

Priceless
Click to expand...
Its good to be on the side 'life'. Its unconstitutional as hell to make the tax payers support the killing of unborn children. Kill them if you will but do it on your own dime...simply because some radical judges found the practice to be legal does not make it moral.

FYI: laws are nothing but a reflection of a society's morality or lack thereof. Laws do not or cannot establish morality they simply identify what society deems to be moral or immoral. Before 1973 and the act of legislating law from the bench there was not one state that found the practice to be legal or moral.

Professing to be BLACK and a supporter of Black Civil rights its strange that you would defend Abortion as one of the reasons that liberals began championing Abortion as a Female right was originally planned to control the Black Population as it was considered a serious problem by the left in this nation.

Have you never studied or introduced yourself to the founder of this manipulative practice and PLANNED PARENTHOOD...Margaret Sanger?

I suggest you do a little research and educate yourself and stop being a tool for fascism and the practice of Eugenics.
 
Last edited:
+ said:
when you end a life, you are killing said life. That's just reality. From mosquitos to grown adults to fetus's that are unborn. A fetus is biologically alive, that is a scientific fact. To abort is to kill.
Click to expand...
Kill what though? A foetus doesn't even have a thalamo-cortical complex that provides consciousness until the 24th and 28th week of gestation.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Perfect FB reply to the Women's march:

All these girls upset about 'my body my choice', but there's a large number of doctors that actually require the wives sign off to give a guy a vasectomy...I'm going to start the men's March "My Balls My Calls"
Click to expand...

Inapt 5 ways.
 
Ralph said:
Its good to be on the side 'life'. Its unconstitutional as hell to make the tax payers support the killing of unborn children. Kill them if you will but do it on your own dime...simply because some radical judges found the practice to be legal does not make it moral. And laws are nothing but a reflection of a societies morality or lack thereof. Laws do not or cannot establish morality they simply identify what society deems to be moral or immoral. Before 1973 and the act of legislating law from the bench there was not one state that found the practice to be legal or moral.
Click to expand...

Read roe v wade. It gives a short history of legalized abortion going back centuries.
 
Milagro said:
Kill what though? A foetus doesn't even have a thalamo-cortical complex that provides consciousness until the 24th and 28th week of gestation.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You mean a human life in a state of gestation...i.e, growth? If its not alive...why the need to kill something that's not alive and growing? FYI: A human...any human does not fully become an example human life until at least 12 - 15 years after it was first conceived. Why not demand the right to kill that same gestating child once it breeches the magical vagina that seems to define human life to you fascists? That same child still needs protection from its mother or parent until that gestation is fully complete....just as it does while still in the womb.

And the fact that so called fetus has a totally unique DNA signature that does not match either parent....defines that gestating life as nothing other than human because that DNA signature does not evolve while gestating...its the same signature in the womb as it is out of the womb. Its the DNA signature of a HUMAN BEING. Now that's real SCIENCE...APPLIED.

If Roe v. Wade ever reaches a conservative bench that actually considers SCIENCE and the precedent established via the rule of law in defining parenthood for compensation to a mother from a deadbeat father....Applied Science will take the stand and quite easily overturn the radical decision from a bench that defined life as a personal opinion...Science defines life as existing from the time of conception...and that child inside the womb as an example of life within the species known as humanity.

Just as the legal precedence makes it a crime punishable by fine and or imprisonment to destroy an example of animal life before birth....in the Endangered Species Act. Its a crime to kill an animal before it born...but not a human being? Really?

Sounds fascist to me.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top