Unarmed man shot dead by police in Arizona

would you surrender your right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches so you can FEEL safer on the road?



DUI checkpoints VIOLATE the 4th Amendment. I've answered that time and again, you just refuse to acknowledge your idiocy.

I don't consider it unreasonable and you saying it violates the 4th amendment is an OPINION of a spoiled brat anarchist that doesn't like doing things unless he wants to do them.

I don't misrepresent what you believe. You're clear to the fact that you care more that a drunk driver be allowed to drive drunk because you think it violates his 4th amendment right to go through a checkpoint than you do about an innocent driver that is killed by such a piece of shit.

At least let me know when someone you love is a victim. While you won't care, the rest of us will.
 
it has had LIMITED success and it tells me that you don't care about your 4th Amendment rights so you can FEEL safer.....like a liberal

So you get to define limited? Not how it works, coward.

Your problem is you want to determine what does and doesn't violate the 4th. Not your place but you still try then whine the little cowardly bitch you are when people don't agree. Typical spoiled brat liberal. "I don't get my way and people don't listen to me".
 
I cannot wait to see how embarrassed you're going to be when all of this shyster's empty sales pitches begin to collapse and start falling flat all around you.

It's going to be so fucking hilarious to throw all your naive, wide-eyed, gullible rah-rah, cheerleading bullshit back in your face.

If you're not hiding out in shame somewhere, that is.

Afraid to show your face.

Get ready because the day is coming.

Perhaps you can prepare us for that day. How did you feel when Obama didn't close Gitmo on his first day in office, didn't give 95% of Americans a tax cut, didn't implement health care reform without an individual mandate or taxing existing employer provided health care, ceased opposing same sex marriage, didn't solve the nuclear problems in Iran and North Korea, didn't sit down with Kim Jong Un, failed to create millions of new good paying jobs, didn't deliver on his shovel ready jobs, etc.

How do you feel looking so stupid?
 
I don't consider it unreasonable and you saying it violates the 4th amendment is an OPINION of a spoiled brat anarchist that doesn't like doing things unless he wants to do them.
Rehnquist himself ALSO said it violates the 4th Amendment, asshole. He allowed it because of freedom hating fucktards like yourself who believes it's governments job to keep them safe.

I don't misrepresent what you believe. You're clear to the fact that you care more that a drunk driver be allowed to drive drunk because you think it violates his 4th amendment right to go through a checkpoint than you do about an innocent driver that is killed by such a piece of shit.
once again, you show us that you have zero clue to what you're talking about, spreading lies because you've been shown to be a government worshipping shit sucker.

At least let me know when someone you love is a victim. While you won't care, the rest of us will.

no you won't, you'll dance in the blood of my family as a victim of something because you think it will make you 'right'. new flash, lowlife, my cousin was murdered by his best friend the day before xmas last year. shot to death during a stupid argument. It doesn't automatically make me a government whore that supports background checks and licenses any more than it did the day before that. so fuck off and die, and I hope it's at the hands of your badged government enforcement agents that you worship.
 
So you get to define limited? Not how it works, coward.

Your problem is you want to determine what does and doesn't violate the 4th. Not your place but you still try then whine the little cowardly bitch you are when people don't agree. Typical spoiled brat liberal. "I don't get my way and people don't listen to me".

actually, it IS my place, just as it is yours. that's why we become jurists, moron.
 
Perhaps you can prepare us for that day. How did you feel when Obama didn't close Gitmo on his first day in office, didn't give 95% of Americans a tax cut, didn't implement health care reform without an individual mandate or taxing existing employer provided health care, ceased opposing same sex marriage, didn't solve the nuclear problems in Iran and North Korea, didn't sit down with Kim Jong Un, failed to create millions of new good paying jobs, didn't deliver on his shovel ready jobs, etc.
what the bloody fuck are you blathering about?

How do you feel looking so stupid?
on the rare occasions that it happens, it makes me feel like you.
 
Rehnquist himself ALSO said it violates the 4th Amendment, asshole. He allowed it because of freedom hating fucktards like yourself who believes it's governments job to keep them safe.

once again, you show us that you have zero clue to what you're talking about, spreading lies because you've been shown to be a government worshipping shit sucker.



no you won't, you'll dance in the blood of my family as a victim of something because you think it will make you 'right'. new flash, lowlife, my cousin was murdered by his best friend the day before xmas last year. shot to death during a stupid argument. It doesn't automatically make me a government whore that supports background checks and licenses any more than it did the day before that. so fuck off and die, and I hope it's at the hands of your badged government enforcement agents that you worship.

So you're one of those that says what he thinks is wrong with something yet proposes nothing to address the problem. Got it.

I'll fuck off, son, when you're man enough to back it up other than with your meaningless demands. I've proven what I said about you as true. You oppose anyone telling you what to do. It's that simple, anarchist.
 
what the bloody fuck are you blathering about?

on the rare occasions that it happens, it makes me feel like you.


You look stupid daily. You're willing to sacrifice the lives of your family members to drunk drivers because you wouldn't want to dare tell a criminal drunk driver to stay off the road.
 
So you're one of those that says what he thinks is wrong with something yet proposes nothing to address the problem. Got it.
you have a solution in search of a problem, one that doesn't exist.

I'll fuck off, son, when you're man enough to back it up other than with your meaningless demands.
son? I know i'm older than you based upon your internet tough guy shit.

I've proven what I said about you as true. You oppose anyone telling you what to do. It's that simple, anarchist.
no, you haven't. but your projection shows why you need a babysitter, big nanny state gov.
 
No. That's your problem. I can have an OPINION on it and you do. We can't define it you arrogant piece of shit. Something isn't so because you say it is.

so you ARE a moron. what do you think happens when a jury renders a decision in a case? they DEFINE reasonable at that time. idiot.
 
you have a solution in search of a problem, one that doesn't exist.

son? I know i'm older than you based upon your internet tough guy shit.

no, you haven't. but your projection shows why you need a babysitter, big nanny state gov.

You don't consider drunk drivers killing innocent people a problem? Apparently not. More proof of my claims about you.

If you know you're older, prove it. You're the one that said your Marine Corp training and Glock are sufficient enough for you. I don't have to say such things. I'll simply do what needs to be done not tell people how good I am.
 
You don't consider drunk drivers killing innocent people a problem? Apparently not.
the solution to that is imprisoning those that kill people when driving drunk, not ignore the 4th Amendment so you can FEEL safer
More proof of my claims about you.
no, it's not really.

If you know you're older, prove it.
what would YOU consider valid proof that doesn't require me revealing any of my personal info to you?

You're the one that said your Marine Corp training and Glock are sufficient enough for you. I don't have to say such things. I'll simply do what needs to be done not tell people how good I am.
you made a claim, i countered it with some of my available tools. that is all.
 
the solution to that is imprisoning those that kill people when driving drunk, not ignore the 4th Amendment so you can FEEL safer
no, it's not really.

what would YOU consider valid proof that doesn't require me revealing any of my personal info to you?

you made a claim, i countered it with some of my available tools. that is all.

Then I haven't misrepresented what you said. You'd rather let people get killed by a drunk driver than prevent it. Unlike you, I'd rather prevent it than let it happen.

Nothing. That's the only valid, undeniable way to do it.

What you did is make another claim you won't back up.
 
Then I haven't misrepresented what you said. You'd rather let people get killed by a drunk driver than prevent it. Unlike you, I'd rather prevent it than let it happen.
so you prefer the illusion of safety over freedom. that's all you needed to say.

Nothing. That's the only valid, undeniable way to do it.
then i'll continue to call you young, immature, and idiotic.

What you did is make another claim you won't back up.
live with it or not, I don't care.
 
Back
Top