blacknwhite321
Verified User
How were you mocking me? I was just stating facts. Nice try thoughThis is where your reading comprehension is lacking. I was mocking Y O U, not the women in office.
How were you mocking me? I was just stating facts. Nice try thoughThis is where your reading comprehension is lacking. I was mocking Y O U, not the women in office.
You hate life, goodness, truth, and your Creator. There was no coded language anywhere in my post. If I fear anything it's ignorance and lies spreading, whether that be via Obama, Michael Moore, Van Jones, or the mainstream press.
![]()
Rosie O'Donnell, Alicia Machado, Carly Fiorina, Megyn Kelly, Kristen Stewart, Arianna Huffington, Gail Collins, Sarah Jessica Parker, Bette Midler, Ghazala Khan, Katy Tur, Michelle Fields, Heidi Cruz, Elizabeth Warren, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mika Brzezinski, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Kim Kardashian, Natasha Stoynoff...
Need I go on?
Congratulations, you listed people's namesDo you have a point you want to make?
If you can read, I already stated the answer to that question... That one man (Trump) is going to "roll back their 'rights'".What "Illogical fear", what "lies propagated by the media", what "manipulation"?
You're a fine one to talk about the Creator. Just sayin'.
Kim Is, that woman would turn out for the opening of a fridge! Here is what Katie Hopkins had to say on that march.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/757428/Katie-Hopkins-savage-rant-Women-s-March-Donald-Trump
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
I embrace free speechThe people using expletives yesterday in their signs and their speeches and rhetoric, and you embrace that emotional outrage![]()
If you can read, I already stated the answer to that question... That one man (Trump) is going to "roll back their 'rights'".
And as Ivanka stated better than anyone, that's not rhetoric against women, instead, it's counter-punching against PEOPLE whom he felt unfairly attacked him, either in their questioning, their remarks, or the lies they spread about him. I guess in your world, if a woman verbally attacks someone, they are immune from getting verbally attacked back? And that then equals "rhetoric against women"? It's a silly charge that Trump hates women or is against them in some encompassing way.Yes. Rebutting your dumb comment that "trump didn't have any "rhetoric against women".
He's not a Supreme Court justice, smart one... That question isn't even relevant to his powers as President.Is trump committed to wanting to change or eliminate Roe v. Wade, yes or no?
but the "Women's March" didn't allow pro-life speech... think of what you're embracing...I embrace free speech
Well if it is 100 days from now and Trump turns out to be the ogre that some are predicting then fair enough. Meantime he hasn't done anything and this just looks like sour grapes.I don't know who Katie Hopkins is. She's entitled to her opinion but she doesn't live here and trump's policies won't affect her.
Is trump committed to wanting to change or eliminate Roe v. Wade, yes or no?
Don't be bloody ridiculous!!but the "Women's March" didn't allow pro-life speech... think of what you're embracing...
On education, free or not, ask for your money back.
He's not a Supreme Court justice, smart one... That question isn't even relevant to his powers as President.
Well if it is 100 days from now and Trump turns out to be the ogre that some are predicting then fair enough. Meantime he hasn't done anything and this just looks like sour grapes.
Lol, same lame insult for everyone you cross? You need new material, Joker. I call you Joker because that is the Trump card!
Yes. Rebutting your dumb comment that "trump didn't have any "rhetoric against women".