How a hoax website about paid protesters came crumbling down live on TV

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
Will the trump supporters here who claimed this was gospel truth now admit they were played...again?

The website for an organization calling itself Demand Protest made its mission pretty clear: “When your strategy demands paid protest, we organize and bring it to life.” Billing itself as a group that generated the “appearance of outrage” on behalf of left-wing causes, the existence of Demand Protest became an attractive story for many right-wing media outlets. The group, it appeared, was proof that dissent against Trump was manufactured by shady leftist organizations, and could be lucrative: one Backpage.com ad placed in Demand Protest’s name promised a full-time job that paid a $2,500 retainer, plus $50/hr., and benefits.

It was It was the perfect story to share, if you’re inclined to believe that anti-Trump protesters must be getting paid to be there. Something to that effect has long been in the canon of largely unsubstantiated rumors circulating on the Trump Internet. A well-known fake news writer even fabricated an “interview” with a protester who said he was paid $3,500 to protest at a Trump rally — a story that was shared on Twitter by Trump’s then-campaign manager. And like that made-up story, it also appears that Demand Protest is a made-up group, one that fooled quite a few news sources before being dramatically debunked on-air by Tucker Carlson...

The Verge and Boing Boing, among others, were skeptical as the story circulated through the conservative press. And on a Fox News segment Tuesday night, someone claiming to represent the group more or less admitted that the whole thing was a hoax.

Tucker Carlson’s bizarre on-camera interview with a Demand Protest representative who gave his name as “Dom Tullipso” felt like a piece of performance art, something even Carlson himself said out loud in the middle of the interview.


“So, this is a sham, your company isn’t real, your website is fake, the claims you have made are lies, this is a hoax,” Carlson began, before saying that his team couldn’t find a record of a person by the name “Dom Tullipso.” The supposed-Tullipso responded by correcting Carlson’s pronunciation of Tullipso. (It seems the “L’s” are silent.”)

“It’s pretty darn easy these days to say whatever you want on national TV and have it passed off as truth,” he said. At the end of the interview, “Tullispso” told Carlson, “God bless you for fact checking, even if you did it while we were on the air.”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...umbling-down-live-on-tv/ar-AAlZKj1?li=BBnbfcL
 
We all saw that 2 days ago and discussed it here. The guy did it to prove how nutty libs are willing to be paid to cause mayhem.
 
Putin probably had something to do with that crap.

Slump and his Ruskie pals will probably be running all kinds of massive misinformation campaigns for some time until Slump gets caught, exposed, impeached and imprisoned.
 
if mr. trump actually takes over the helm of this thing; all of this propaganda/ fake news will become obsolete and no longer of any consequence at all. with hope for some peace, extinct. you are fired.
 
We all saw that 2 days ago and discussed it here. The guy did it to prove how nutty libs are willing to be paid to cause mayhem.

Guess Cfan don't watch Fox News or wouldn't believe it until msn repeated what Fox News already broadcast......
 
Kind of got that backwards...the libs were duped into believing the offer was for real and in the process exposed their violent tendencies.:palm:
Exactly, and it was "right-wing" Tucker Carlson that did his homework and exposed the guy on air. He tends to expose people during the first interview segment on his show. People who don't watch the show, and only read a poor synopsis of it online, won't necessarily understand what actually happened and how Tucker normally conducts his show. :palm:
 
Exactly, and it was "right-wing" Tucker Carlson that did his homework and exposed the guy on air. He tends to expose people during the first interview segment on his show. People who don't watch the show, and only read a poor synopsis of it online, won't necessarily understand what actually happened and how Tucker normally conducts his show. :palm:

Dopey. Rabid righties on this site posted over and over that George Soros was paying protesters, now that push comes to shove they're all bleating "who, me"? Just a sample:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...tion-of-Police-officer&highlight=George+Soros

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...yone-EXCEPT-the-rioters&p=1566164#post1566164

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...RGE-SOROS-is-DANGEROUS&highlight=George+Soros
 
Will the trump supporters here who claimed this was gospel truth now admit they were played...again?

The website for an organization calling itself Demand Protest made its mission pretty clear: “When your strategy demands paid protest, we organize and bring it to life.” Billing itself as a group that generated the “appearance of outrage” on behalf of left-wing causes, the existence of Demand Protest became an attractive story for many right-wing media outlets. The group, it appeared, was proof that dissent against Trump was manufactured by shady leftist organizations, and could be lucrative: one Backpage.com ad placed in Demand Protest’s name promised a full-time job that paid a $2,500 retainer, plus $50/hr., and benefits.

It was It was the perfect story to share, if you’re inclined to believe that anti-Trump protesters must be getting paid to be there. Something to that effect has long been in the canon of largely unsubstantiated rumors circulating on the Trump Internet. A well-known fake news writer even fabricated an “interview” with a protester who said he was paid $3,500 to protest at a Trump rally — a story that was shared on Twitter by Trump’s then-campaign manager. And like that made-up story, it also appears that Demand Protest is a made-up group, one that fooled quite a few news sources before being dramatically debunked on-air by Tucker Carlson...

The Verge and Boing Boing, among others, were skeptical as the story circulated through the conservative press. And on a Fox News segment Tuesday night, someone claiming to represent the group more or less admitted that the whole thing was a hoax.

Tucker Carlson’s bizarre on-camera interview with a Demand Protest representative who gave his name as “Dom Tullipso” felt like a piece of performance art, something even Carlson himself said out loud in the middle of the interview.


“So, this is a sham, your company isn’t real, your website is fake, the claims you have made are lies, this is a hoax,” Carlson began, before saying that his team couldn’t find a record of a person by the name “Dom Tullipso.” The supposed-Tullipso responded by correcting Carlson’s pronunciation of Tullipso. (It seems the “L’s” are silent.”)

“It’s pretty darn easy these days to say whatever you want on national TV and have it passed off as truth,” he said. At the end of the interview, “Tullispso” told Carlson, “God bless you for fact checking, even if you did it while we were on the air.”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...umbling-down-live-on-tv/ar-AAlZKj1?li=BBnbfcL

A day late and a dollar short. Are you just finding this out? That the 900K paid protesters was a JOKE...fake news? Perhaps thats why you lost the election. You don't know what happening until someone tells you sheep. You have no ability for critical independent thought in attempting to find out the truth, before you go spreading fake news around like its factual.
 
A day late and a dollar short. Are you just finding this out? That the 900K paid protesters was a JOKE...fake news? Perhaps thats why you lost the election. You don't know what happening until someone tells you sheep. You have no ability for critical independent thought in attempting to find out the truth, before you go spreading fake news around like its factual.

Spare me. Read #12. Rabid righties spread the "paid protesters" lie for as long as the campaign went on. Then they continued to spread it about the inauguration.

I'm way ahead of you, Ralphie.
 
Back
Top