China media warns US of War over South China Sea Dredge Islands

tsuke said:
if it comes to like an actual fight though your going to have the 11 fleets concentrated against china's 2 as america will use all its military force in that scenario instead of trying to mantain a global presence during that fight. At that point it wont really matter how good the chinese jets are.

if it was US vs. china china would quickly be reduced to land based aircraft but the US will not be able to invade so its a stalemate.

The China-Russo plan right now seems to be to develop the silk road and set up something like the continental system.

Read up on Napoleon and what he tried to do when it became clear they werent going to defeat britains navy.
Click to expand...
Ive never gamed out "total war".
it's too insane to complicate -you get into anti-satellite weaponry that would cripple a lot of GPS based systems.

Curious as to what you mean by
The China-Russo plan right now seems to be to develop the silk road and set up something like the continental system.
Click to expand...
is this some kind of partnership ?do you have any links I could look at?
 
"Lol..Sears. thinks ..." PP #33

Haven't I already warned you about you presuming to assert my position?
Have you ever gotten it right without quoting me?

..Sears. thinks this is about dredging." PP #33

Sears thinks the title of this topic is: China media warns US of War over South China Sea Dredge Islands

Did you fail to note the word "Dredge" in the title.

No sir or m'am.

Sears is sophisticated enough to understand that the underlying motive here is China's expansionist ambitions, and that $Trillions could be at stake; in fishing rights, drilling rights, and sovereign control of what are now treated as international waters.

So please tell us PP.
Are you just acting stupid? Or are you the genuine article?
 
sear said:
"Lol..Sears. thinks ..." PP #33

Haven't I already warned you about you presuming to assert my position?
Have you ever gotten it right without quoting me?

..Sears. thinks this is about dredging." PP #33

Sears thinks the title of this topic is: China media warns US of War over South China Sea Dredge Islands

Did you fail to note the word "Dredge" in the title.

No sir or m'am.

Sears is sophisticated enough to understand that the underlying motive here is China's expansionist ambitions, and that $Trillions could be at stake; in fishing rights, drilling rights, and sovereign control of what are now treated as international waters.

So please tell us PP.
Are you just acting stupid? Or are you the genuine article?
Click to expand...

You thought it was about dredging..../chuckles silently.....and now you're trying to deny it.....
 
Last edited:
#43

a) Dredging is not the objective, but the means to the objective.

b) If you wish to fantasize dredging is irrelevant to the topic, be my guest. But then why is the word "Dredge" in the title?

c) Please quote any words I've posted which support your ridiculous lie.
 
anatta said:
Ive never gamed out "total war".
it's too insane to complicate -you get into anti-satellite weaponry that would cripple a lot of GPS based systems.

Curious as to what you mean by

is this some kind of partnership ?do you have any links I could look at?
Click to expand...

my analysis :)
 
sear said:
c) Please quote any words I've posted which support your ridiculous lie.
Click to expand...

what a dumbfuck....

sear said:
"Just did mate, an international tribunal at the Hague declared that China's commandeering of the Spratly Islands is illegal," M #20

a) That's news to me.

b) On what basis? Dredging is illegal? Or

c) Dredging is illegal when China does it?

"what else do you need to know?" M #20

Got a sister?
Click to expand...
 
#46

Well done.

Now quote words I've previously posted which actually support your preposterous accusation.
 
tsuke said:
11>2. China knows its not going to compete with the US navy period. Its already experiencing economic slowdown.

BUT! it knows the US cannot sustain a landwar with china. The US populace will revolt at the casualties it causes, which is why the chinese nightmare scenario is a friendly russia as all of a sudden a hostile force may appear on their border.
Click to expand...

This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read on the Internet and that's saying something. You are a moron for even going to attempted occupation in the first place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top