How does being allowed to carry a concealed weapon across State borders

Threedee said:
Why are you still ignoring the plain meaning of the words "did I say it was law?" I would say that rejecting the Declaration and Natural Law is to reject America.
Click to expand...

YOU would say that? I would say you were full of shit. Natural law is not invoked nor mentioned once in the supreme law of the land. I have no use for the supernatural, nor do the courts, for legal guidance.

Who said I rejected the Declaration? You? lol
 
sear said:
#195

Neither the Constitution's preamble nor the DOI are enforceable law.

BUT !!

Both provide insight into what our Founders intended.

Anyone that disregards natural law does so at their peril. Every time Wile E. Coyote steps off the cliff, gravity gets him.
Click to expand...

(laughing) You're getting laws of physics confused with natural law.

Next
 
domer76 said:
Amazing! When they say there's no such thing as a stupid question, you really break the mold. More stupid questions than one can shake a stick at!
Click to expand...

so you don't know who wrote the constitution? who the FINAL arbiters of the constitution truly are? and you have the gall to call others stupid??????

you can be dismissed now.
 
#203

Well honey, if you have a patent on gravity, I've got a $rich business deal for you!

But if you don't
if NO ONE does, then it's natural.

Astrophysicist Albert Einstein said gravity (nature) and acceleration (whatever) are indistinguishable, and therefore identical.
 
archives said:
When does common sense prevail over your fear of being safer?

Your chances of getting killed in the majority of those States with stricter gun laws is about as remote as you getting struck by lighting, in fact, others getting killed by your use of the gun is probably greater
Click to expand...

right, it is getting close to a tie when one compares recent wars to south Chicago where the gun laws are the strictest
 
domer76 said:
YOU would say that? I would say you were full of shit. Natural law is not invoked nor mentioned once in the supreme law of the land. I have no use for the supernatural, nor do the courts, for legal guidance.

Who said I rejected the Declaration? You? lol
Click to expand...

Try reading the 14th Amendment, retard. It's got our natural rights enshrined within the text. I believe that one is legally binding... They are also protected in the 5th.

If you reject what the Declaration says, you reject the Declaration.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you don't know who wrote the constitution? who the FINAL arbiters of the constitution truly are? and you have the gall to call others stupid??????

you can be dismissed now.
Click to expand...

Damn, Cletus, you get more amusing with every post! The hysterical part is that you get confused by your OWN POSTS! But, we can review.

Your question was: "Did SCOTUS write the Constitution?"

My response was that, in disagreement with the adage 'there are no stupid questions', I pointed out that was indeed a STUPID QUESTION. And correctly added you pose MANY stupid questions.

I know exactly who wrote the Constitution. Obviously, you do not. Hence, your stupid question.

Next?
 
domer76 said:
Damn, Cletus, you get more amusing with every post! The hysterical part is that you get confused by your OWN POSTS! But, we can review.

Your question was: "Did SCOTUS write the Constitution?"

My response was that, in disagreement with the adage 'there are no stupid questions', I pointed out that was indeed a STUPID QUESTION. And correctly added you pose MANY stupid questions.

I know exactly who wrote the Constitution. Obviously, you do not. Hence, your stupid question.

Next?
Click to expand...

Yeah, uh...fail on your part.
 
sear said:
#203

Well honey, if you have a patent on gravity, I've got a $rich business deal for you!

But if you don't
if NO ONE does, then it's natural.

Astrophysicist Albert Einstein said gravity (nature) and acceleration (whatever) are indistinguishable, and therefore identical.
Click to expand...

(laughing) Try this, dimwit. Google "natural law". You will find discussions of political philosophy. You won't find 9.8 m/s/s.
 
Threedee said:
Try reading the 14th Amendment, retard. It's got our natural rights enshrined within the text. I believe that one is legally binding... They are also protected in the 5th.

If you reject what the Declaration says, you reject the Declaration.
Click to expand...

(laughing) OUR natural rights? Endowed by the Creator, right? Where the fuck were they before they were codified in the 14th, moron? Floating around in the ether? And what "natural right" are you referring to? Plus, pally boy, it's only enforceable because it's CODIFIED. Your abstract and subjective notions of what constitute "natural law" doesn't mean shit.

Unless you've had a direct revelation from your Creator, nimrod, you have no fucking clue what your Creator endowed or didn't endow. Only what some human being concocted from HUMAN experience, not supernaturally given.

Flail away. This is amusing to watch the struggle.
 
domer76 said:
(laughing) OUR natural rights? Endowed by the Creator, right? Where the fuck were they before they were codified in the 14th, moron? Floating around in the ether? And what "natural right" are you referring to? Plus, pally boy, it's only enforceable because it's CODIFIED. Your abstract and subjective notions of what constitute "natural law" doesn't mean shit.

Unless you've had a direct revelation from your Creator, nimrod, you have no fucking clue what your Creator endowed or didn't endow. Only what some human being concocted from HUMAN experience, not supernaturally given.

Flail away. This is amusing to watch the struggle.
Click to expand...

You're wrong. It's enforceable because I can enforce it. Tell me you aren't a little bitch.
 
domer76 said:
(laughing) OUR natural rights? Endowed by the Creator, right? Where the fuck were they before they were codified in the 14th, moron? Floating around in the ether? And what "natural right" are you referring to? Plus, pally boy, it's only enforceable because it's CODIFIED. Your abstract and subjective notions of what constitute "natural law" doesn't mean shit.

Unless you've had a direct revelation from your Creator, nimrod, you have no fucking clue what your Creator endowed or didn't endow. Only what some human being concocted from HUMAN experience, not supernaturally given.

Flail away. This is amusing to watch the struggle.
Click to expand...

Am I to understand that life, liberty, and property are not the natural rights that Locke spoke of?
 
domer76 said:
(laughing) OUR natural rights? Endowed by the Creator, right? Where the fuck were they before they were codified in the 14th, moron? Floating around in the ether? And what "natural right" are you referring to? Plus, pally boy, it's only enforceable because it's CODIFIED. Your abstract and subjective notions of what constitute "natural law" doesn't mean shit.

Unless you've had a direct revelation from your Creator, nimrod, you have no fucking clue what your Creator endowed or didn't endow. Only what some human being concocted from HUMAN experience, not supernaturally given.

Flail away. This is amusing to watch the struggle.
Click to expand...

I do...the same one our founders had.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top